Epstein Secrets

of a public court proceeding or the right to restitution. In her memorandum, petitioner relies upon In Re Dean, 527 F.3d 391 (5th Cir. 2008), where the Fifth Circuit held that the CVRA required the government to "confer in some reasonable way with the victims before ultimately exercising its broad discretion." Id

ent, none of Mr. Edwards' clients had expressed a desire to be consulted prior to the resolution of the federal investigation. Id. In October 2007, C.W. was not represented by counsel. a. y 8. She was given telephonic notice of the agreement, as were three other victims. Id. These four individuals we

ed to the victim by both the FBI Victim-Witness Specialist and AUSA Villafafa. ILI 3. Petitioner's counsel, Brad Edwards, Esq., currently represents C.W., T.M., and S.R. The U.S. Attorney's Office victim notification letter to C.W. was provided by the FBI. and the letter to T.M. was hand-delivered by

of a public court proceeding or the right to restitution. In her memorandum, petitioner relies upon In Re Dean, 527 F.3d 391 (5th Cir. 2008), where the Fifth Circuit held that the CVRA required the government to "confer in some reasonable way with the victims before ultimately exercising its broad discretion." Id

ent, none of Mr. Edwards' clients had expressed a desire to be consulted prior to the resolution of the federal investigation. Id. In October 2007, C.W. was not represented by counsel. Id.. $ 8. She was given telephonic notice of the agreement, as were three other victims. Id. These four individuals

were provided to the victim by both the FBI Victim-Witness Specialist and AUSA al 3. Petitioner's counsel, Brad Edwards, Esq., currently represents C.W., T.M., and S.R. The U.S. Attorney's Office victim notification letter to C.W. was provided by the FBI. and the letter to T.M. was hand-delivered by

of a public court proceeding or the right to restitution. In her memorandum, petitioner relics upon In Re Dean, 527 F.3d 391 (5th Cir. 2008), where the Fifth Circuit held that the CVRA required the government to "confer in some reasonable way with the victims before ultimately exercising its broad discretion." Id

were provided to the victim by both the FBI Victim-Witness Specialist and AUSA a¶ 3. Petitioner's counsel, Brad Edwards, Esq., currently represents C.W., T.M., and S.R. The U.S. Attorney's Office victim notification letter to C.W. was provided by the 1:131. and the letter to T.M. was hand-delivered

, and to S.R. on May 30, 2008. Villafafla Decl., ¶ 3. Throughout the investigation, AUSAInauld the FBI's Victim-Witness Specialist had contact with C.W. ¶ 4. Earlier in the investigation, T.M. was represented by James Eisenberg, E:sq. Consequently, all contact with T.M. was made through Mr. Eisenber

of a public court proceeding or the right to restitution. In her memorandum, petitioner relies upon In Re Dean, 527 F.3d 391 (5th Or. 2008), where the Fifth Circuit held that the CVRA required the government to "confer in some reasonable way with the victims before ultimately exercising its broad discretion." a

on May 30, 2008 (Ex. 5). 4. Throughout the investigation, the FBI agents, the FBI's Victim-Witness Specialist, and your A (tient had contact with C.W. and II Attorney Edwards' other client, was represented by counsel and, accordingly, all contact with MB was made through that attorney. That attor