ttorney Edwards' other client, ■was represented by counsel and, accordingly, all contact with e as made through that attorney. That attorney was James Eisenberg, and his fees were paid by Jeffrey Epstein, the target of the investigation.3 5. In the summer of 2007, Mr. Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office

2255 as she would have had, if Mr. Epstein The undersigned does not know when Mr. Edwards began representiner whether v er formally terminated Mr. Eisenberg's representation. -3- EFTA00215437 had been tried federally and convicted of an enumerated offense. For purposes of implementing this paragraph,

below. Sincerely, R. Alexander Acosta United States Attorney By: Assistant United States Attorney I have received this letter from my attorney, James Eisenberg, Esquire, have read it and discussed it with my attorney, and I hereby acknowledge that it fully sets forth my understanding and agreement with the

est Palm Beach, FL 33401 Facsimile: September DELIVERY BY ELECTRONIC MAIL James Eisenber , Es . West Palm Beach Florida 33401-5007 Re Dear Mr. Eisenberg! I am writing to clarify the ground rules for the debriefing with your client "your client"), to occur September 2006. Please be advised that if y

guy and he didn't do nothing wrong, nothing. Id. at 58. 16. Several months after the videotaped interview of April 24, 2007, AUSA asked attorney Eisenberg whether she could contact Jane Doe No. 2 directly and was told that any contact with Jane Doe No. 2 had to occur via Mr. Eisenberg. Ex. S, ¶ 14. 17

awsuits against Jeffrey Epstein. 13. During the course of the federal criminal investigation of Epstein, Jane Doe No. 2 was represented by attorney James Eisenberg, Esq., whose services were paid for by Epstein. Ex. S, ¶ 7. 14. Through her attorney, Jane Doe No. 2 refused to be interviewed by the FBI and U.S.

guy and he didn't do nothing wrong, nothing. Id. at 58. 16. Several months after the videotaped interview of April 24, 2007, AUSA asked attorney Eisenberg whether she could contact Jane Doe No. 2 directly and was told that any contact with Jane Doe No. 2 had to occur via Mr. Eisenberg. Ex. S, ¶ 14. 17

wsuits against Jeffrey Epstein. 13. During the course of the federal criminal investigation of Epstein, Jane Doe No. 2 was represented by attorney, James Eisenberg, Esq., whose services were paid for by Epstein. Ex. S, I 7. 14. Through her attorney, Jane Doe No. 2 refused to be interviewed by the FBI and U.S.

when they were fifteen years old. L2The undersigned does not know when Mr. Edwards began representing M. or whether M. ever formally terminated Mr. Eisenberg's representation. EFTA00215554

orney Edwards' other client, M., was represented by counsel and, accordingly, all contact with M. was made through that attorney. That attorney was James Eisenberg, and his fees were paid by Jeffrey Epstein, the target of the investigation. U 5. In the summer of 2007, Mr. Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office

States Attorney Southern District of Florida DELIVERY BY ELECTRONIC MAIL James Eisenberg, Esq. West Palm Beach Florida 33401-5007 Re: Dear Mr. Eisenberg: Facsimile: September 14, 2006 I am writing to clarify the ground rules for the debriefing with your client, ("your client"), to occur September

U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida DELIVERY BY ELECTRONIC MAIL James Eisenberg, Esq. West Palm Beach Florida 33401-5007 Re: Dear Mr. Eisenberg: Facsimile: September 14, 2006 I am writing to clarify the ground rules for the

llafafia and the FBI's Victim-Witness Specialist had contact with C.W. Villafafia Decl., 1 4. Earlier in the investigation, T.M. was represented by James Eisenberg, Esq. Consequently, all contact with T.M. was made through Mr. Eisenberg. In mid-2007, Epstein's attorneys approached the U.S. Attorney's Office in

fia Decl., 1 4. Earlier in the investigation, T.M. was represented by James Eisenberg, Esq. Consequently, all contact with T.M. was made through Mr. Eisenberg. In mid-2007, Epstein's attorneys approached the U.S. Attorney's Office in an effort to resolve the federal investigation. al 5. At that time, Mr.

ners during the investigation of Epstein are highly relevant in determining whether each petitioner can even invoke the CVRA. Through her attorney, James Eisenberg, Esq.,' Jane Doe No. 2 refused to be interviewed by the FBI and U.S. Attorney's Office unless she was granted immunity. Ex. A, Sept. 21, 2006 Ltr.

.,' Jane Doe No. 2 refused to be interviewed by the FBI and U.S. Attorney's Office unless she was granted immunity. Ex. A, Sept. 21, 2006 Ltr. from Eisenberg to AUSA ; Ex. S, ¶¶ 6-12. Thus, she was unwilling to provide any information regarding her encounters with Epstein unless she was assured her state

rviewed by the FBI and U.S. Attorney's Office unless she was granted immunity pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 6001 et seq. Ex. A, Oct. 24, 2006 e-mail from Eisenberg to AUSI1 Ex. S,11 6-12. Jane Doe No. 2 was unwilling to provide any information regarding her encounters with Epstein unless she was assured her s

During the course of the federal criminal investigation Epstein, Jane Doe No. 2 was represented by attorney, James Eisenberg, Esq., whose services were paid for by Epstein. Ex. S, 9 7. Through her attorney, Jane Doe No. 2 refused to be interviewed by the FBI and U.S. Att

ttorney Edwards' other client, MI, was represented by counsel and, accordingly, all contact with was made through that attorney. That attorney was James Eisenberg, and his fees were paid by Jeffrey Epstein, the target of the investigation. Fs 4. In the summer of 2007, Mr. Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Offic

livered as each victim was contacted. F3The undersigned does not know when Mr. Edwards began representing or whether ever formally terminated Mr. Eisenberg's representation. EFTA00014149

investigation, and the FBI's Victim-Witness Specialist had contact with C.W. Villafafa Decl., ¶ 4. Earlier in the investigation, was represented by James Eisenberg, Esq. Consequently, all contact wit=vas made through Mr. Eisenberg. In mid-2007, Epstein's attorneys approached the U.S. Attorney's Office in an e

W. Villafafa Decl., ¶ 4. Earlier in the investigation, was represented by James Eisenberg, Esq. Consequently, all contact wit=vas made through Mr. Eisenberg. In mid-2007, Epstein's attorneys approached the U.S. Attorney's Office in an effort to resolve the federal investigation. Id. , 9 5. At that time,

y Edwards' other client, T.M., was represented by counsel and, accordingly, all contact with T.M. was made through that attorney. That attorney was James Eisenberg, and his fees were paid by Jeffrey Epstein, the target of the investigation.' 5. In the summer of 2007, Mr. Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office

would have had, if Mr. Epstein 'The undersigned does not know when Mr. Edwards began representing T.M. or whether T.M. ever formally terminated Mr. Eisenberg's representation. -3- EFTA00081324 Caest9:9818a0EMEMMUOIM DOcutnseen8H31-61EntEnicired EirillaillocEltecl0stl/IDE1/20i201B4S5111 8 had been tried

oughout the investigation, and the FBI's Victim-Witness Specialist had contact with )ecl., ¶ 4. Earlier in the investigation, .v as represented by James Eisenberg, Esq. Consequently, all contact with T.M. was made through Mr. Eisenberg. In mid-2007, Epstein's attorneys approached the U.S. Attorney's Office in

with )ecl., ¶ 4. Earlier in the investigation, .v as represented by James Eisenberg, Esq. Consequently, all contact with T.M. was made through Mr. Eisenberg. In mid-2007, Epstein's attorneys approached the U.S. Attorney's Office in an effort to resolve the federal investigation. At that time, Mr. Epstei

the victims to advise them of this result. One of those victims who was contacted was via her attorney, James Eisenberg. Your Affiant informed Mr. Eisenberg that was on a list that would be submitted to Epstein of victims whom the Office had identified as being entitled to seek damages against Epstein.

h Attorney Edwards' other client, was represented by counsel and, accordingly, all contact with was made through that attorney. That attorney was James Eisenberg, and his fees were paid by Jeffrey Epstein, the target of the investigation. F2 EFTA00220740 5. In the summer of 2007, the U.S. Attorney's Offic

she would have had, if Mr. Epstein 'The undersigned does not know when Mr. Edwards began representing ■. or whether ■. ever formally terminated Mr. Eisenberg's representation. -3- EFTA00176958 had been tried federally and convicted of an enumerated offense. For purposes of implementing this paragraph,

orney Edwards' other client, M., was represented by counsel and, accordingly, all contact with M. was made through that attorney. That attorney was James Eisenberg, and his fees were paid by Jeffrey Epstein, the target of the investigation? 5. • In the summer of 2007, Mr. Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Offic

would have had, if Mr. Epstein 'The undersigned does not know when Mr. Edwards began representing T.M. or whether T.M. ever formally terminated Mr. Eisenberg's representation. -3- EFTA00184199 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/15/2008 Page 4 of 21 had been tried federally an

y Edwards' other client, T.M., was represented by counsel and, accordingly, all contact with T.M. was made through that attorney. That attorney was James Eisenberg, and his fees were paid by Jeffrey Epstein, the target of the investigation.' 5. In the summer of 2007, Mr. Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office

became known as a possible victim of Epstein. Jane Doe 2 was openly hostile to the idea of a criminal prosecution of Epstein. Through her attorney, James Eisenberg, Esq., Jane Doe 2 declined to be interviewed without a grant of use immunity. Mr. Eisenberg was retained and paid by Epstein to provide representat

nal prosecution of Epstein. Through her attorney, James Eisenberg, Esq., Jane Doe 2 declined to be interviewed without a grant of use immunity. Mr. Eisenberg was retained and paid by Epstein to provide representation to Jane Doe 2. The Government applied for and received immunity for Jane Doe 2 under 18

nal prosecution of Epstein. Through her attorney, James Eisenberg, Esq., Jane Doe 2 declined to be interviewed without a grant of use immunity. Mr. Eisenberg was retained and paid by Epstein to provide representation to Jane Doe 2. The Government applied for and received immunity for Jane Doe 2 under 18

became known as a possible victim of Epstein. Jane Doe 2 was openly hostile to the idea of a criminal prosecution of Epstein. Through her attorney, James Eisenberg, Esq., Jane Doe 2 declined to be interviewed without a grant of use immunity. Mr. Eisenberg was retained and paid by Epstein to provide representat

Attorney Edwards' other client, was represented by counsel and, accordingly, all contact with was made through that attorney. That attorney was James Eisenberg, and his fees were paid by Jeffrey Epstein, the target of the investigation. 5. In the summer of 2007, Mr. Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office f

g when they were fifteen years old. L2The undersigned does not know when Mr. Edwards began representing or whether ■ ever formally terminated Mr. Eisenberg's representation. EFTA00014085

would have had, if Mr. Epstein 'The undersigned does not know when Mr. Edwards began representing T.M. or whether T.M. ever formally terminated Mr. Eisenberg's representation. -3- EFTA00221657 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 31-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/29/2008 Page 5 of 22 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM

Edwards' other client, 'f.M., was represented by counsel and, accordingly, all contact with T.M. was made through that attorney. That attorney was James Eisenberg, and his fees were paid by Jeffrey Epstein,* the target of the investigation.' 5. In the summer of 2007, Mr. Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Offic