ne from the Office had communicated the victim list to Epstein, attorneys for Epstein made contact with the Office complaining of the designation of T.M. as a victim. Epstein's attorneys used the designation of T.M. as yet another basis to allege prosecutorial misconduct against your Affiant, the age

FBI agents (Ex. 1). Your Affiant's letter to T.M. was hand-delivered by myself to T.M. at the time that she was interviewed (Ex. 2). Both C.W. and T.M. also received letters from the FBI's Victim-Witness Specialist, which were dispatched on January 8, 2008 (Exs. 3 & 4). S.R. was initially identified

dwards' three clients, T.M., C.W., and S.R. Ft Your Affiant's letter to C.W. was hand-delivered by the FBI agents (Ex. 1). Your Affiant's letter to T.M. was hand-delivered by myself to T.M. at the time that she was interviewed (Ex. 2). Both C.W. and T.M. also received letters from the FBI's Victim-Wi

se the U.S. Attorney's modification limited Epstein's liability to victims whom the United States was prepared to name in an indictment. In light of T.M.'s prior statements to law enforcement, your Affiant could not in good faith include T.M. as a victim in an indictment and, accordingly, could not i

urrently represents C.W., T.M., and S.R. The U.S. Attorney's Office victim notification letter to C.W. was provided by the 1:131. and the letter to T.M. was hand-delivered by AUSA UMto her when she was interviewed in April 2007. FBI victim notification letters were mailed to C.W. and .r.m. on - 3 -

ovided to the victim by both the FBI Victim-Witness Specialist and AUSA a¶ 3. Petitioner's counsel, Brad Edwards, Esq., currently represents C.W., T.M., and S.R. The U.S. Attorney's Office victim notification letter to C.W. was provided by the 1:131. and the letter to T.M. was hand-delivered by AUSA

d to Bradley Edwards' three clients, T.M., C.W., and S.R.' Your Affiant's letter to C.W. was provided by the FBI. (Ex. 1). Your Affiant's letter to T.M. was hand-delivered by myself to T.M. at the time that she was interviewed (Ex. 2).? Both C.W. and T.M. also received letters from the FBI's Victim-

victim by both the FBI Victim-Witness Specialist and AUSA Villafafia. Id., 3. Petitioner's counsel, Brad Edwards, Esq., currently represents C.W., T.M., and S.R. The U.S. Attorney's Office victim notification letter to C.W. was provided by the FBI. and the letter to T.M. was hand-delivered by AUSA V

se the U.S. Attorney's modification limited Epstein's liability to victims whom the United States was prepared to name in an indictment. In light of T.M.'s prior statements to law enforcement, your Affiant could not in good faith include T.M. as a victim in an indictment and, accordingly, could not i

FBI agents (Ex. 1). Your Affiant's letter to T.M. was hand-delivered by myself to T.M. at the time that she was interviewed (Ex. 2). Both C.W. and T.M. also received letters from the FBI's Victim-Witness Specialist, which were dispatched on January 8, 2008 (Exs. 3 & 4). S.R. was initially identified

dwards' three clients, T.M., C.W., and S.R. Ft Your Affiant's letter to C.W. was hand-delivered by the FBI agents (Ex. 1). Your Affiant's letter to T.M. was hand-delivered by myself to T.M. at the time that she was interviewed (Ex. 2). Both C.W. and T.M. also received letters from the FBI's Victim-Wi

ne from the Office had communicated the victim list to Epstein, attorneys for Epstein made contact with the Office complaining of the designation of T.M. as a victim. Epstein's attorneys used the designation of T.M. as yet another basis to allege prosecutorial misconduct against your Affiant, the age

TEIN employed defendants - a/k/a " and to perform, among other things, services as personal assistants. 1. Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN and paid T.M., H.R., and A.F. to perform, among other things, recruiting services. 2. Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN owned a property located at 358 El Brillo Way, P

t 2, 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN reviewed a written telephone message prepared by one of his employees regarding a telephone call received from T.M. and Jane Doe #12 that stated: "They are available all weekend and maybe [Jane Doe #13] too". 2. On or about August 21, 2004, Defendant placed a

JEFFREY EPSTEIN caused a payment of $200 to be made to Jane Doe #6. Jane Does #7 and #8 1. In or around July 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN led T.M., who was then a fifteen-year-old girl, and Jane Doe #7, who was then a sixteen-year-old girl, from the kitchen of 358 El Brillo Way upstairs to Def

REY EPSTEIN employed L.G. to perform, among other things, services as a personal assistant. 3! '3 Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN and SARAH KELLEN paid T.M., H.R., and A.F. to perform, among other things, recruiting services. 4. Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN owned a property located at 358 El Brillo Way,

e of Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN prepared a written telephone message for Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN's review regarding a telephone call received from T.M. and Jane Doe #12 that stated: "They are available all weekend and maybe [Jane Doe ilt] too". 20 EFTA00192710 (97) On or about August 21, 2004, D

EFFREY EPSTEIN caused a payment of $200 to be paid to Jane Doe #6. Jane Does #7 and #8 (46) In or around July 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN led T.M., who was then a fifteen-year-old gik„and Jane Doe #7, who was then a sixteen-years-old girl, from the kitchen of 358 El Brillo Way upstairs to Defe

EFFREY EPSTEIN employed L.G. to perform, among other things, services as a personal assistant. 3. Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN and SARAH KELLEN paid T.M., H.R., and A.F. to pe orrn, among other things, recruiting services. 4. Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN owned a property located at 358 El Brillo Way,

phone calls to a telephone used bpane Doe #7. (48) On or about July 5, 2004, Defendant SARAH KELLEN placed a telephone call to a telephone used by T.M. 14 EFTA00191737 (49) In or around July 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN masturbated in the presence of Jane Doe #8, who was then a seventeen-yea

EFFREY EPSTEIN caused a payment of $200 to be paid to Jane Doe #6. Jane Does #7 and #8 (46) In or around July 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN led T.M., who was then a fifteen-year-old gikand Jane Doe #7, who was then a sixteen-years-old girl, from the kitchen of 358 El Brillo Way upstairs to Defen

Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN employed L.G. to perform, among other things, services as a personal assistant. 1) Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN and paid T.M., H.R., and A.F. to perform, among other things, recruiting services. 4. Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN owned a property located at 358 El Brillo Way,

e of Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN prepared a written telephone message for Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN's review regarding a telephone call received from T.M. and Jane Doe #12 that stated: "They are available all weekend and maybe [Jane Doe #lp] too". 20 EFTA00225820 (83) On or about December 30, 2004

to a telephone used by Jane Doe #10. 17 EFTA00225823 (58) On or about July 16, 2004, Defendant placed a telephone call to a telephone used by T.M. (59) On or about July 17, 2004, one of Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN's employees prepared a written telephone message for Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN's

a telephone call to a telephone used by Jane Doe #8. D (56) On or about July 15, 2004, Defendant placed a telephone call to a telephone used by T.M. (57) On or about July 16, 2004, Defendant placed one or more telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #7. (58) On or about July 16, 2004

ee of Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN prepared a written telephoF message for Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN's review regarding a telephone call received from T.M. and Jane Doe #12 that stated: "They are available all weekend and maybe pane Doe #13] too". 20 EFTA00225764 (83) On or about December 30, 2004,

or more telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #7. (58) On or about July 16, 2004, Defendant placed a telephone call telephone used by T.M. (59) On or about July 17, 2004, one of Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN's employees prepared a written telephone message for Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN's

d to Bradley Edwards' three clients, T.M., C.W., and S.R.' Your A Mantis letter to C.W. was provided by the FBI. (Ex. I ). Your Affiant's letter to T.M. was hand-delivered by myself to T.M. at the time that she was interviewed (Ex. 2).2 Both C.W. and T.M. also received letters from the FBI's Victim-

se the U.S. Attorney's modification limited Epstein's liability to victims whom the United States was prepared to name in an indictment. In light of T.M.'s prior statements to law enforcement, your Affiant could not in good faith include T.M. as a victim in an indictment and, accordingly, could not i

e of Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN prepared a written telephone message for Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN's review regarding a telephone call received from T.M. and Jane Doe #10 that stated: "They are available all weekend and maybe [Jane Doe #11] too". (71) On or about August 21, 2004, Defendant placed a

phone call received from Jane Doe #4 that read: "I have a female for him." Jane Doe #7 (32) In or around July 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN led T.M., who was then a fifteen-year-old girl, and Jane Doe #7, who was then a sixteen-years-old girl, from the kitchen of 358 El Brillo Way upstairs to De

ha •••••• Itesern,•• 'at,* ma& rar•aa/ladros aflarbe Spann •••••••••••• eampaal asosattamall in law +.....1 lir. 4-• QS.... %law ‘1•Nlipwlensk T.M. aw (Owls or pieftrat= •aaaa • • .1, 1,1 ••• 0.1,111.16170.411.. ndkemn-tannes4rtawb•eir•Illmewanat ways anal.... ISE •••••% mas • • ••.* .IF •

ileserhh,.• Thal& rootbah)/lahrosimik•A have Spann tomehelloWho ••••••••••••• nohow Sat ashenstIlahasve in a +.....1 lir. h.-, h. hlwahhilahm T.M. mia trutio or piefttist= I ens.: • e ••• 0.1 ,111.16170.411.. ndkemn -tannes ,rtawb • t^) Owens Ilwedinra ways anal.... — • woman • • •

'aee• Toad, ne•aa/bess imp aflarno• bane. elal.elkete "ebb maw eabeleb eamereibbenectelaras we be lar +.....1 ln.4-• ♦INia, tis•in thee ba-llselenek T.M. no or pnmoosic In4m. Femme ibe an endbmetenneziewet•••.•11ambeemat Illarbiener at MEd Dar Or bak ••••11••••• • • • ••• Pt. • MA h./M.:W./S4ar ow

esern,•• ',or* xxtV r•••• Ohms or)Ornon Spann trom•IttlW•rolirob••••••••••••lir asons•Ilamall or +.... .1 l.r.4-• xN.u.•n• %Iwo' •ealswlaillk T.M. i•la nal or pieftroP I ens.: • e .1, 1, 1V•In4m. rearm, •ort enaeemetesetezeteeb tritImIllmalwanat Ilarredan• warm •••••••Or 1St netnews • t •

he victim by both the FBI Victim-Witness Specialist and AUSA Villafafa. ILI 3. Petitioner's counsel, Brad Edwards, Esq., currently represents C.W., T.M., and S.R. The U.S. Attorney's Office victim notification letter to C.W. was provided by the FBI. and the letter to T.M. was hand-delivered by AUSA V

currently represents C.W., T.M., and S.R. The U.S. Attorney's Office victim notification letter to C.W. was provided by the FBI. and the letter to T.M. was hand-delivered by AUSA Villafaiia to her when she was interviewed in April 2007. FBI victim notification letters were mailed to C.W. and T.M. on

••• l)Is•sim .T have Spann itamihflettema fl esh •••••••••••••• awmpanhal ashenattarand in um la i ••• .4 I tr. a at •Iwa, tism. tlarai ‘mallsalfeak T.M. mla nal al pilmoist= I • e ens.: • e lam •s•Ikemn-tanns4rtawb•ermilmewasmat 114..&•••• crams ad•Airty ISE •••••••••• • • ••ila at. • ma kw coa•

Traidararthr.M.IMIIIP.ANMIMilfiligIIIRIIIWIMINOlillAt•VallaIMIIIMMIC.41.1•1•••••••••A••••••••11r0IVitIga I a.. 44 •r.4., .Qs.. am Miami haalhwlenak T.M. ela DINS sr Itialg•P , , • • a aa lahlm.reahno la Sam natms.-taamehtal• • •••••) mi Owens moms warm elm nob ISE • wet En • hale... rah ham.

Tratartl.r.M.IMIIIP.ANMIIMilfaIIIRIIIWIMIN0iillAt•Vallal•••••••••••1•••••••••••A••••••••11r0IVitIga ...v 4 I tr. 4., Qs...am Miami hamallawleellk T.M. ela ill Phet..11•1h , , • a a • • 0 ....a.•1a• reavna &a an nalatms" taateehtal• • erm.) mi Owens Illeheilany 'warm ad noir ISE • wet En • r.

• milar•••••• //Pass 1.•• have Spann itamilhelatemollembisonnhalit awmpaihalashanstIlaravetrour +.....1 I tr. a ...•lwa, tism• %Iwo' ••••••Iswlensk T.M. aw (Owls or pilmoist= •r4n a.: • a .1, 1, 1 V• ift4,111.16 son•Vantones ,MAA•eir•Ill • Owens Ilhoheilianercpays nett lak••••••••••• • • A...* r

ileserhh,.• Thal& rootbah)/lahrosimik•A have Spann tomehelloWho ••••••••••••• nohow Sat ashenstIlahasve in a +.....1 lir. h.-, h. hlwahhilahm T.M. trutio or piefttist= I ens.: • e ••• 0.1 ,111.16170.411.. ndkemn -tannes ,rtawb • t^) Owens Ilwedinra ways anal.... — • woman • • • nle

ha •••••• Itesern,•• 'at,* ma& rar•aa/ladros aflarbe Spann •••••••••••• eampaal asosattamall in law +.....1 lir. 4-• QS.... %law ‘1•Nlipwlensk T.M. aw (Owls or pieftrat= •aaaa • • .1, 1,1 ••• 0.1,111.16170.411.. ndkemn-tannes4rtawb•eir•Illmewanat ways anal.... ISE •••••% mas • • ••.* .IF •

to Bradley Edwards' three clients, T.M., C.W., and S.R.' Your Affiant's letter to C.W. was provided by the FBI. (Ex. I ). Your Affiant's letter to T.M. was hand-delivered by myself to T.M. at the time that she was interviewed (Ex. 2).2 Both C.W. and T.M. also received letters from the FBI's Victim-

se the U.S. Attorney's modification limited Epstein's liability to victims whom the United States was prepared to name in an indictment. In light of T.M.'s prior statements to law enforcement, your Affiant could not in good faith include T.M. as a victim in an indictment and, accordingly, could not i

• milar•••••• //Passim. Wes Spann itamihflettema fl esh •••••••••••••• awmpanhal ashenattarand ••• +.....1 I tr. a at •Iwa, tam• thrat ‘mallsalfeak T.M. mla nal or pilmoist= I •renerie•e ••• ift4,111.16170.411.. •s•Ikemn- tames Womb • eirmil Owens 114.••••••cpays ad party — •••••• Nan • • •••* r

Traidars•SahM.ISSIIIP.AhaliMilfiligIIIRIIIWIMIN0iillAt•Vallal•••••••••••1•••••••••••A••••••••11r0IVitIga +.....1 I ,•.r •p..0 thaw hamallawleellk T.M. ela DINS Otilhel•alh , , • a • • 0 I a• warm. re nano &a an •sa lam tames Wad. • erm.) mi Owens II air mono warm ad noir ISE • wet En • • r. t

se the U.S. Attorney's modification limited Epstein's liability to victims whom the United States was prepared to name in an indictment. In light of T.M.'s prior statements to law enforcement, your Affiant could not in good faith include T.M. as a victim in an indictment and, accordingly, could not i

to Bradley Edwards' three clients, T.M., C.W., and S.R.' Your Affiant's letter to C.W. was provided by the FBI. (Ex. I ). Your Affiant's letter to T.M. was hand-delivered by myself to T.M. at the time that she was interviewed (Ex. 2).2 Both C.W. and T.M. also received letters from the FBI's Victim-