Epstein Secrets

ember 28, 2007 ' 4 Message: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012659 TAB 36 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012660 oof "Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)" To "Jay Lefkowitz" cc "Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS)" "Acosta, Alex (USAFLS)” bec 11/28/2007 04:46 PM Subject Epstein: Victim Notification Letter Dear Jay: Jeff asked that I forward t

the terms and conditions of the September 24, 2007 Agreement as amended by letter from United States Attorney Acosta. HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012666 ia Me Jeffrey H. Sloman First Asst. US Attorney Southern District of Florida HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012667 TAB 38 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012668 [dj001/006 05/16/2008 11:16 FAX Boor

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012671 2] 004/006 05/16/2008 11:16 FAX ioe 05/16/08 FRI 11:09 FAX 80 novel as to implicate the so-called “‘clear statement rule,” the Ex Post Facto clause, or the Due Process clause. As with the other legal issues, Mr. Acosta may elect to proceed with the case. Absence of coercion. With respect

ith a copy of the prosecution memo related to the indictment. On September 7, 2007, Epstein's attorneys met with the U.S. Attorney, Drew Oosterbaan, Jeff Sloman, John McMillan, and I. Ken Starr presented federalism arguments, urging deferral to state prosecution. When those arguments failed, Epstein's attor

8-80736-CV-MARRA P-0 I 1789 EFTA00192835 Memorandum Subjeci Operation Leap Year: Notification of Breach USAO No. 2006R0 181 June 9, 2009 To Jeffrey H. Sloman Acting United States Attorney Robert K. Senior First Assistant U.S. Attorney Rolando Garcia Deputy Chief, Criminal Division, West Palm Beach Ka

Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/26/2009 Page 8 of 36 B. Masha's Law Does Not Apply To This Case. The presumption against retroactivity and the Ex Post Facto clause preclude application of Masha's Law in this case, where the alleged predicate conduct was completed before 2006. 1. Congress Dld Not Intend

our client to agree to unconscionable contract terms cannot square with the true facts of this case. As explained in letters from Messrs. Acosta and Sloman, the indictment was postponed for more than five months to allow you and Mr. Epstein's other attorneys to make presentations to the Office to convi

be 2 EFTA00289786 06/16/2008 11:16 FAI 06/18/08 FRI 11:09 FAX bliOS/006 1:9004 so novel as to implicate the so-called "clear statement rule," the Ex Post Facto clause, or the Due Process clause. As with the other legal issues, Mr. Acosta may elect to proceed with the case. Absence of coercion. With respect