18
Total Mentions
18
Documents
471
Connected Entities
Organization referenced in documents
EFTA00192747
2 EFTA00192750 05/16/2008 II:10 FAA 05/10708 FRI 11:09 FAX '&9004/000 rib 004 so novel as to implicate the so-called "clear statement rule," the Ex Post Facto clause, or the Due Process clause. As with the other legal issues, Mr. Acosta may elect to proceed with the case. Absence of coercion. With respect
EFTA00192835
Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/26/2009 Page 8 of 36 B. Masha's Law Does Not Apply To This Case. The presumption against retroactivity and the Ex Post Facto clause preclude application of Masha's Law in this case, where the alleged predicate conduct was completed before 2006. 1. Congress Dld Not Intend
EFTA00208429
e 2 EFTA00208431 05/16/2008 11:16 FAX 05/18/08 FRI 11:09 FAX %Eluvifugiv g6004 so novel as to implicate the so-called "clear statement rule," the Ex Post Facto clause, or the Due Process clause. As with the other legal issues, Mr. Mona may elect to proceed with the case. Absence of coercion. With respect t
EFTA00212413
e 2 EFTA00212415 05/16/2008 11:16 FAX 05/18/08 FRI 11:09 FAX %Eluvifugiv g6004 so novel as to implicate the so-called "clear statement rule," the Ex Post Facto clause, or the Due Process clause. As with the other legal issues, Mr. Mona may elect to proceed with the case. Absence of coercion. With respect t
EFTA00214446
e 2 EFTA00214448 05/16/2008 11:16 FAX 05/18/08 FRI 11:09 FAX %Eluvifugiv g6004 so novel as to implicate the so-called "clear statement rule," the Ex Post Facto clause, or the Due Process clause. As with the other legal issues, Mr. Mona may elect to proceed with the case. Absence of coercion. With respect t
EFTA00214480
e 2 EFTA00214482 05/16/2008 11:16 FAX 05/18/08 FRI 11:09 FAX %Eluvifugiv g6004 so novel as to implicate the so-called "clear statement rule," the Ex Post Facto clause, or the Due Process clause. As with the other legal issues, Mr. Mona may elect to proceed with the case. Absence of coercion. With respect t
EFTA00223469
be 2 EFTA00223472 05/16/2008 11:1U FAX 05/1O08 FRI 11:09 FAX luivv4itivo O004 so novel as to implicate the so-called "clear statement rule," the Ex Post Facto clause, or the Due Process clause. As with the other legal issues, Mr. Acosta may elect to proceed with the case. Absence of coercion. With respect
EFTA00224768
be 2 EFTA00224771 05/16/2008 11:1U FAX 05/1O08 FRI 11:09 FAX luivv4itivo O004 so novel as to implicate the so-called "clear statement rule," the Ex Post Facto clause, or the Due Process clause. As with the other legal issues, Mr. Acosta may elect to proceed with the case. Absence of coercion. With respect
EFTA00289782
be 2 EFTA00289786 06/16/2008 11:16 FAI 06/18/08 FRI 11:09 FAX bliOS/006 1:9004 so novel as to implicate the so-called "clear statement rule," the Ex Post Facto clause, or the Due Process clause. As with the other legal issues, Mr. Acosta may elect to proceed with the case. Absence of coercion. With respect
EFTA01718407
ot be 2 EFTA01718491 05/16/2008 11:16 FAX 05/18/08 FRI 11:09 FAX @004/006 1004 so novel as to implicate the so-called "clear statement rule," the Ex Post Facto clause, or the Due Process clause. As with the other legal issues, Mr. Acosta may elect to proceed with the case. Absence of coercion. With respect
EFTA00191587_sub_001 - EFTA00191587_100
ct future behavior *1039 and that the question is so vague as to be meaning- less. That calls into play the concept our Court of Appeals applied to the Ex Post Facto r Clause (albeit in a different con t from the present one) in United States Sutton, 521 F.2d 1385, 1390- (7th ir.1975) (quoting United State
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012671 2] 004/006 05/16/2008 11:16 FAX ioe 05/16/08 FRI 11:09 FAX 80 novel as to implicate the so-called “‘clear statement rule,” the Ex Post Facto clause, or the Due Process clause. As with the other legal issues, Mr. Acosta may elect to proceed with the case. Absence of coercion. With respect
EFTA00175214_sub_002 - EFTA00175214_200
ports, cited above herein, consistently referring to the presumptive minimum damages amount under §2255 as "punishment" or "penalties? According to the Ex Post Facto doctrine, although §2255 is labeled a "civil remedy," such label is not dispositive; "if the effect of the statute is to impose punishment that is
EFTA00102999_sub_001 - EFTA00102999_100
of limitations for such crimes through the lifetime of the victim. 30 EFTA00103055 the resurrection of time-barred prosecutions, in violation of the Ex Post Facto Clause.14 But that concern is entirely separate from extending the statute of limitations for live claims, which is what Congress did here. Critica
EFTA00099941_sub_001 - EFTA00099941_100
of limitations for such crimes through the lifetime of the victim. 30 EFTA00099997 the resurrection of time-barred prosecutions, in violation of the Ex Post Facto Clause.14 But that concern is entirely separate from extending the statute of limitations for live claims, which is what Congress did here. Critica
EFTA00077606_sub_001 - EFTA00077606_100
Leahy's comments indicate that Congress declined to add language that would allow for the resurrection of time-barred prosecutions, in violation of the Ex Post Facto Clause.14 But that conduct in 2000). Indeed, that is precisely what Congress authorized when it extended the statute of limitations for such crimes
EFTA00039421_sub_001 - EFTA00039421_100
Leahy's comments indicate that Congress declined to add language that would allow for the resurrection of time-barred prosecutions, in violation of the Ex Post Facto Clause.14 But that conduct in 2000). Indeed, that is precisely what Congress authorized when it extended the statute of limitations for such crimes
EFTA00184224_email_012_sub_002 - EFTA00184224_372
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361-39 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 4 of 6 so novel as to implicate the so-called "dear statement rule," the Ex Post Facto clause, or the Due Process clause. As with the other legal issues, Mr. =may elect to proceed with the case. Absence of coercion. With respect to 1

Jeffrey Epstein
PersonAmerican sex offender and financier (1953–2019)

Alexander Acosta
PersonAmerican attorney and politician, 27th U.S. Secretary of Labor (born 1969)

Department of Justice
OrganizationUnited States Department of Justice, federal executive department responsible for law enforcement

Prince Andrew
PersonThird child of Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh (born 1960)

Jay Lefkowitz
PersonAmerican lawyer

United States
LocationCountry located primarily in North America

Drew Oosterbaan
PersonDOJ attorney, referenced in Epstein case documents

Stephanie Thacker
PersonUnited States Circuit Judge
Kirkland & Ellis LLP
OrganizationLarge law firm in the United States, based in Chicago, Illinois
Jane Doe
PersonPseudonym for anonymous victims/witnesses in Epstein legal proceedings
Citigroup Center
OrganizationOffice building in Midtown Manhattan

Larry Page
PersonAmerican computer scientist and Internet entrepreneur (born 1973)

Scarlett Johansson
PersonAmerican actress (born 1984)
the Southern District
LocationFederal judicial district in New York City

George W. Bush
PersonPresident of the United States from 2001 to 2009

Sarah Kellen
PersonAmerican assistant to Jeffrey Epstein, named as unindicted co-conspirator in 2008 non-prosecution agreement
Joe Recarey
PersonFormer Palm Beach Police detective who led the original investigation of Jeffrey Epstein (died 2018)

Ken Starr
PersonAmerican judge and educational administrator (1946–2022)
FBI
OrganizationFederal Bureau of Investigation, domestic intelligence and security service of the United States

Supreme Court
OrganizationHighest court of jurisdiction in the US