Epstein Secrets

6 FAX 05/16/08 FRI 11:08 FAX ql) 002 U.S. Department of Justice Criminal Division Child exotoiroslun end Oblcatlry SartIon Jay Lefkowitz, Esq. Kirkland & Ellis LLP Citigroup Center 153 E. 53s St. New York, NY 10022-4611 Re: Investigation oficffery Epstein Dear Mr. Leflcowitz: 1400 New York Avenue. NW Suf

e 2 EFTA00212415 05/16/2008 11:16 FAX 05/18/08 FRI 11:09 FAX %Eluvifugiv g6004 so novel as to implicate the so-called "clear statement rule," the Ex Post Facto clause, or the Due Process clause. As with the other legal issues, Mr. Mona may elect to proceed with the case. Absence of coercion. With respect t

AX ql) 002 U.S. Department of Justice Criminal Division Andrew G. Oosterbaan, Chief Child exptedinaun end Oknewilly Banton Jay Lefkowitz, Esq. Kirkland & Ellis LLP Citigroup Center 153 E. 53s St. New York, NY 10022-4611 Re: Investigation of/eery Epstein Dear Mr. Leflcowitz: /400 New York Avessuct NW SLOG

e 2 EFTA00214448 05/16/2008 11:16 FAX 05/18/08 FRI 11:09 FAX %Eluvifugiv g6004 so novel as to implicate the so-called "clear statement rule," the Ex Post Facto clause, or the Due Process clause. As with the other legal issues, Mr. Mona may elect to proceed with the case. Absence of coercion. With respect t

RI 11:08 FAX ql) 002 U.S. Department of Justice Criminal Division hief Child &Nedra:tun end Oknewthy Saellon May 15, 2008 Jay Lefkowitz, Esq. Kirkland & Ellis LLP New York, NY 10022-4611 Re: Investigation of/eery Epstein Dear Mr. Leflcowitz: Pursuant to your request and the request of U.S. Attorney R. Alex

e 2 EFTA00214482 05/16/2008 11:16 FAX 05/18/08 FRI 11:09 FAX %Eluvifugiv g6004 so novel as to implicate the so-called "clear statement rule," the Ex Post Facto clause, or the Due Process clause. As with the other legal issues, Mr. Mona may elect to proceed with the case. Absence of coercion. With respect t

idu O002 U.S. Department of Justice Criminal Division Andrew (3. Oosterbaan, Chief Child training:ion and Otacen0Y Section Jay Lofkowitz, EEL. Kirkland & Ellis LLP Citigroup Center 153 B. 53" St. New York, NY 10022-4611 Re: Investigation of Jeffery Epstein Dear Mr. Lefkowitz: 1400 Now York thaw,. NW 51di

be 2 EFTA00223472 05/16/2008 11:1U FAX 05/1O08 FRI 11:09 FAX luivv4itivo O004 so novel as to implicate the so-called "clear statement rule," the Ex Post Facto clause, or the Due Process clause. As with the other legal issues, Mr. Acosta may elect to proceed with the case. Absence of coercion. With respect

idu O002 U.S. Department of Justice Criminal Division Andrew (3. Oosterbaan, Chief Child training:ion and Otacen0Y Section Jay Lofkowitz, EEL. Kirkland & Ellis LLP Citigroup Center 153 B. 53" St. New York, NY 10022-4611 Re: Investigation of Jeffery Epstein Dear Mr. Lefkowitz: 1400 Now York thaw,. NW 51di

be 2 EFTA00224771 05/16/2008 11:1U FAX 05/1O08 FRI 11:09 FAX luivv4itivo O004 so novel as to implicate the so-called "clear statement rule," the Ex Post Facto clause, or the Due Process clause. As with the other legal issues, Mr. Acosta may elect to proceed with the case. Absence of coercion. With respect

weavuu lib 002 U.S. Department of Justice Criminal Division Andrew a Oosterbaan, Chief child tratokadun and OtacraySaction Jay Lefkowitz, Esq. Kirkland & Ellis LLP Citigroup Center 153 E. 53i0 St. Now York, NY 10022-4611 Re: Investigation of Jeffery Epstein Dear Mr. Lefkowitz: 1400 New rod:Avow. NW Salle

2 EFTA00192750 05/16/2008 II:10 FAA 05/10708 FRI 11:09 FAX '&9004/000 rib 004 so novel as to implicate the so-called "clear statement rule," the Ex Post Facto clause, or the Due Process clause. As with the other legal issues, Mr. Acosta may elect to proceed with the case. Absence of coercion. With respect

erely, Assistant Leg Attache , EFTA01718414 12/07/07 FRI 15:31 FAX 1 Mel R I RRLAND&ELLI S LLP 91002 Ken oth W. Styr To *Writrr I ctly: KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP VIA FACS1 E Honorable R. Alexander costa United States Attorney United States Attorney's Office South istrict of Florida 2 Rc: Jeffrey Epst

ot be 2 EFTA01718491 05/16/2008 11:16 FAX 05/18/08 FRI 11:09 FAX @004/006 1004 so novel as to implicate the so-called "clear statement rule," the Ex Post Facto clause, or the Due Process clause. As with the other legal issues, Mr. Acosta may elect to proceed with the case. Absence of coercion. With respect

Q002/006 ej002 U.S. Department of Justice Criminal Division Andrew G. Oosterbaan, Chief CUM aoloitenion and OfraunkySentan Jay Lefkowitz, Esq. Kirkland & Ellis LLP Citigroup Center 153 E. 53111St. New York, NY 10022-4611 Re: Investigation of Epstein Dear Mr. Lefkowitz: 14014m Yak Angus. NW Suite 600 Wa

be 2 EFTA00289786 06/16/2008 11:16 FAI 06/18/08 FRI 11:09 FAX bliOS/006 1:9004 so novel as to implicate the so-called "clear statement rule," the Ex Post Facto clause, or the Due Process clause. As with the other legal issues, Mr. Acosta may elect to proceed with the case. Absence of coercion. With respect

ial, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Kirkland & Ellis LLP or Kirkland & Ellis International LLP. Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012671 2] 004/006 05/16/2008 11:16 FAX ioe 05/16/08 FRI 11:09 FAX 80 novel as to implicate the so-called “‘clear statement rule,” the Ex Post Facto clause, or the Due Process clause. As with the other legal issues, Mr. Acosta may elect to proceed with the case. Absence of coercion. With respect

y, Moskowitz, = Abdus-Salaam, JJ. 6081 30129/10 (*Wile People of the State of New York, Respondent, I Jeffrey E. Epstein, Defendant-Appellant. Kirkland & Ellis LLP, New York (Jay P. Lefkowitz of EFTA00184585 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361-38 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 3 of 5 counsel), for ap

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361-39 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 4 of 6 so novel as to implicate the so-called "dear statement rule," the Ex Post Facto clause, or the Due Process clause. As with the other legal issues, Mr. =may elect to proceed with the case. Absence of coercion. With respect to 1