Epstein Secrets

Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida Fin:Ass:slam S A twenty DELIVERY BY FACSIMILE Jay P. Lefkowitz, Esq. Kirkland & Ellis LLP Citigroup Center 153 East 53rd Street New York, New York 10022-4675 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Mr. Lefkowitz, 99 PIE 4 Sew May 19, 2008 I am i

m to be. It should be noted that the SDFL has never provided you with any evidence supporting its investigation. This is not, and has never been, an Alford plea situation (see North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 91 S.Ct. 160 (1970)). Ultimately, you requested an independent review. Subsequent to th

Attorney Southern District of Florida Pori ASSISIOnt U.S. Attorney 99 N.E 4 Swett Alban FL 33!)) DELIVERY BY FACSIMILE Jay P. Lefkowitz, Esq. Kirkland & Ellis LLP Citigroup Center 153 Fast 53rd Street New York, New York 10022-4675 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Mr. leficowitz, May 19, 2008 I am in receipt of

m to be, It should be noted that the SDFL has never provided you with any evidence supporting its investigation. This is not, and has never been, an Alford plea situation (see North Carolina Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 91 S.Ct: 160 (1970)). Ultimately, you requested an independent review. Subsequent to the

al, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Kirkland & Ellis LLP or Kirkland & Ellis International LLP. Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited an

m to be. It should be noted that the SDFL has never provided you with any evidence supporting its investigation. This is not, and has never been, an Alford plea situation (see North Carolina'. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 91 5.O. 160 (1970)). Ultimately, you requested an independent review. Subsequent to the

12-1 WD 1 Leittsuita i-t Aogic., EFTA00176147 12/26/2007 14:45 FAX KIRKLANDSELLIS 01002/008 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP Jar P. Lofkowitx, P.C. To O Willis Directly: 446-497o logo kiddand.com VIA FACSIMILE (305) 530-6444 Honorable R. Alexander Acosta I Minx] S

5", clearly prevents Mr. Epstein from fulfilling the material terms and conditions the Agreement. As you lcnow, this is not, and has never been, an Alford plea situation (see North Carolina I. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 91 S.Ct. 160 (1970)). Your reference to requiring "Mr. Epstein to in essence admit guilt

ment of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida First Assistant U.S. Attorney DELIVERY BY FACSIMILE Jay P. Leflcowitz, Esq. Kirkland & Ellis LLP Citigroup Center 153 East 53rd Street New York, New York 10022-4675 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Mr. Leflcowitz, 99 N.E. 4 Street Miami, FL 33132

m to be. It should be noted that the SDFL has never provided you with any evidence supporting its investigation. This is not, and has never been, an Alford plea situation (see North Carolina Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 91 S.Ct. 160 (1970)). Ultimately, you requested an independent review. Subsequent to the

Florida First Assistant U.S. Attorney 7 99 N.E. 4 Street Miami, FL 33132 (305) 961-9100 DELIVERY BY FACSIMILE May 19, 2008 Jay P. Lefkowitz, Esq. Kirkland & Ellis LLP Citigroup Center 153 East 53rd Street New York, New York 10022-4675 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Mr. Lefkowitz, I am in receipt of your e-mail dated

m to be. It should be noted that the SDFL.has never provided you with any evidence supporting its investigation. This is not, and has never been, an Alford plea situation (see North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 91 S.Ct. 160 (1970)). Ultimately, you requested an independent review. Subsequent to the

rtment of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida Fern Assistant U.S. Attorney DELIVERY BY FACSIMILE Jay P. Lefkowitz, Esq. Kirkland & Ellis LLP Citigroup Center 153 East 53rd Street New York, New York 10022-4675 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Mr. Lefkowitz, 99 N.E. 4 Street Miami. FL 33132

em to be, It should be noted that the SDFL has never provided you with any evidence supportig its investigation. This is not, and has never been, an Alford plea situation (see North Carolina Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 91 S.Ct. 160 (1970)). Ultimately, you requested an independent review. Subsequent to the

to places that they have never before reached. We sincerely appreciate your attention to this matter. ttespeetililly submitted, Kenneth W. Starr Kirkland & Ellis LLP Joc D. Whitley Alston & Bird LIP EFTA00225682 tAVULfUO WAN £O:VL CAA OU0 0001 OGSV otp. in • n8 WIN 13:211 PAX 1 213 080 8500 well namvullro

them to be, It should be noted that the SDFL has never provided you with any evidence suppolg its investigation. This is not, and has never been, an Alford plea situation (see North Carolina Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 91 S.Ct: 160 (1970)). Ultimately, you requested an independent review. Subsequent to the

ng: 268 Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-013329 EFTA00230234 LIM° 7 1Xiskat,olh /2) SiaoCu'l Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-013330 EFTA00230235 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP AND AIFILIAIE0 PARTNERSHIPS rtraete vokm Jay P. Letkowitz, P.C. To ca Writer Directly: VIA E-MAIL Jeffrey H. Sloman United States Attorney's O

55", clearly prevents Mr. Epstein from fulfilling the material terms and conditions the Agreement. As you know, this is not, and has never been, an Alford plea situation (see North Carolina I Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 91 S.Ct. 160 (1970)). Your reference to requiring "Mr. Epstein to in essence admit guilt,