Epstein Secrets

on August 28th, and we will plan to indict on September 4th. This schedule also should give us enough time to resolve the computer issue with Judge Marra. Let me know what you think. Thanks. A. Marie Villafaila Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Pho

s enough time to resolve the computer issue with Judge Marra. Let me know what you think. Thanks. A. Marie V

le plea negotiations is dramatically changed upon the return of an indictment. Once an indictment is returned, the Office does not intend to file a Superseding Information containing a lesser charge or to dismiss the case in favor of state prosecution. Exhibit 41 EFTA00224226 S • • LILLY ANN SANCIII2, ESQ. AUGU

ubx YES iN COMPLAINT O UNDER F.R.C.P. 23 complaint: JURY DEMAND: . go NO Vill. RELATED (See Instructions): (SEE ATTACHED) : CASE(S) IF ANY JUDGE KENNETH A. MARRA DOCKET NUMBER 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON Jane Doe 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein 3-W-O*€ SIGNATURE OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR OF

(SEE ATTACHED) : CASE(S) IF ANY JUDGE KENNETH A. MARRA DOCKET NUMBER 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON Jane Doe

ible plea negotiations is dramatically changed upon the return of an indictment. Once an indictment is returned, the Office does not intend to file a Superseding Information containing a lesser charge or to dismiss the case in favor of state prosecution. Please let us know your client’s decision by no later than August 1

tion is GRANTED. DONE AND ORDERED in chambers this day of , 2007, at West Palm Beach, Florida. cc: AUSA Roy Black, Esq. William Richey, Esq. KENNETH A. MARRA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE West Palm Beach EFTA00179097 (Rev. 06/2005)Seakd Document Tracking Form UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Southern Dis

Roy Black, Esq. William Richey, Esq. KENNETH A. MARRA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE West Palm Beach E

le plea negotiations is dramatically changed upon the return of an indictment. Once an indictment is returned, the Office does not intend to file a Superseding Information containing a lesser charge or to dismiss the case in favor of state prosecution. EFTA00179083 LILLY ANN SANCHEZ, ESQ. AUGUST 3, 2007 PAGE 2 Pl

on August 28th, and we will plan to indict on September 4th. This schedule also should give us enough time to resolve the computer issue with Judge Marra. Let me know what you think. Thanks. A. Marie Villafafia Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Pho

s enough time to resolve the computer issue with Judge Marra. Let me know what you think. Thanks. A. Marie V

le plea negotiations is dramatically changed upon the return of an indictment. Once an indictment is returned, the Office does not intend to file a Superseding Information containing a lesser charge or to dismiss the case in favor of state prosecution. Exhibit 41 EFTA00226190

e original message. Thank you. 240 08-80736-CV-MARRA RFP WPB-001744 EFTA00184602 Case 9:08-cv-8073

le plea negotiations is dramatically changed up6n the return of an indictmeht. Once an indictment is returned, the Office does not intend to file a Superseding Information containing a lesser charge or to dismiss the case in favor of state prosecution. 08-80736-CV-MARRA RFP WPB 001479 EFTA00184665 Case 9:08-cv-807

lea deal,” Miami Herald, Dec. 6, 2018. 5 Doe v. United States, 359 F. Supp. 3d 1201 (S.D. Fla., Feb. 21, 2019) (Opinion and Order, 9:08-80736-CIV- Marra). v Secretary of Labor. In a brief oral statement, Acosta explained that continued media attention on his handling of the Epstein investig

e plea negotiations is drnmatically changed upon the return of an indictment. Once an indictment is returned, the Office does ttot intend to file a Superseding Information containing a lesser charge or to dismiss the case in favor of state prosecution. 58 Menchel told OPR that in his view, the two-year sentence esta