Epstein Secrets

ise for gain, benefit, advantage or livelihood" (Black's Law Dictionary (7th ed. 2007)) or as "a usually

sterday. 'write to you now to supplement our discussion. As you know, I feel strongly that the involvement of the federal government—culminating in the Deferred Prosecution Agreement—runs afoul of fundamental principles of federalism, the well-established Petite Policy, and issues of paramount importance with respect to the admi

ou for your response. Our communications with Roy Black and later with you were solely to determine what

rey Epstein Dear Marie: a rcsmokt: )14$.4900 1 write in response to your letter dated August 15. 2008 regarding the civil restitution portion of the Deferred Prosecution Agreement (the "Agreement"). Thank you for confirming our position that the December modification proposal is not part of the Agreement. As expressed by U.S.

t: iinTrz-nrw•InTrnara 408 4'21 PM To: '; 'Roy BLACK' Cc: nson, aren I • S) Subject: Hearing wit

008 Re: deity Epstein nestrtolu: ) 4A13.4900 I write in response to your letter dated August 15. 2008 regarding the civil restitution portion of the Deferred Prosecution Agreement (the "Agreement"). Thank you for tumlIrmIng our position that ember modification proposal is not port of the Agreement. As expressed by U.S. Attor

lack From: Jay P. Lelkowim Company: United States Attorney's Office Company: • United States Attorney's Office Atterbury. Goldberger & Weiss Black, Srehnick, Komspan & Snimpf Fax #: Fax Direct #: Direct Date: September 2. 2008 Pageswkovec 2 Fax #: Message: Please see attached. EFTA00

Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Marie: Fauzintikt: I write in response to your letter dated August 15. 2008 regarding the civil restitution portion of the Deferred Prosecution Agreement (the "Agreement"). Thank you for confirming our position that the December modification proposal is not part of the Agreement. As expressed by U.S.

your office hopefully before the year ends. Roy Black RB/wg Enclosure Black, Srebnick. Komspan & Stu

fallen into this manifest legal error.22 In addition, federal prosecutors insisted that they dictate every detail of the State sentence pursuant to the Deferred Prosecution Agreement. Once again, this was done without any coordination with the State. Federal prosecutors went so far as to demand a restriction on the judge not to