ach, Florida 33401 .Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear= I write in response to your letter dated August 15. 2008 regarding the civil restitution Tonic', of the Deferred Prosecution Agreement (the "Agreement."). Thank you for continuing 'our .ptisit ion that the DeCenther modification proposal is not putt of the Agreement. As expresSed b

rey Epstein Dear Marie: a rcsmokt: )14$.4900 1 write in response to your letter dated August 15. 2008 regarding the civil restitution portion of the Deferred Prosecution Agreement (the "Agreement"). Thank you for confirming our position that the December modification proposal is not part of the Agreement. As expressed by U.S.

psicin lkar Marie: Fac,Anisle (212) 446.4100 I write in response to your letter dattxl August IS. 2008 regarding the civil restitution pinion of the Deferred Prosecution Agreement (the "Agreement- ). Thank you Air confirming our position that the December modification proposal is not part of the Agreement. As expressed by U.S

sterday. 'write to you now to supplement our discussion. As you know, I feel strongly that the involvement of the federal government—culminating in the Deferred Prosecution Agreement—runs afoul of fundamental principles of federalism, the well-established Petite Policy, and issues of paramount importance with respect to the admi

008 Re: deity Epstein nestrtolu: ) 4A13.4900 I write in response to your letter dated August 15. 2008 regarding the civil restitution portion of the Deferred Prosecution Agreement (the "Agreement"). Thank you for tumlIrmIng our position that ember modification proposal is not port of the Agreement. As expressed by U.S. Attor

fallen into this manifest legal error.22 In addition, federal prosecutors insisted that they dictate every detail of the State sentence pursuant to the Deferred Prosecution Agreement. Once again, this was done without any coordination with the State. Federal prosecutors went so far as to demand a restriction on the judge not to

ion of the Petite Policy, and an appendix, which includes significant documentary evidence including testimony by witnesses that was obtained after the Deferred Prosecution Agreement was signed. For the reasons we discuss in the submission, we do not believe this is an appropriate case for federal prosecution. I want to call you

Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Marie: Fauzintikt: I write in response to your letter dated August 15. 2008 regarding the civil restitution portion of the Deferred Prosecution Agreement (the "Agreement"). Thank you for confirming our position that the December modification proposal is not part of the Agreement. As expressed by U.S.