Epstein Secrets

construed as an admission of civil or criminal liability in regards to any of those who seek compensation from the Trust. See draft proposal from Jay Lelkowitz to Andrew l.nurie dated September 15. 2007. In response, Ms. • nded that the Agreement contain language considering the inclusion of guardian ad M

ch. I did this in an attempt to avoid what I foresaw would likely be 'litigious seleaion process. It was only after I proposed this change that Mr. Lelkowitz raised with me his enumerated concerns. 2 Section 2255 provides that: "[tiny person who, while' minor, was' victim of violation of [enumerated secti

dentified victims and Epstein's counsel may contort the identified victims through that counsel. Sere draft non-pmsecutio agreement nailed from to Lelkowitz dated September 17. 20117. The inclusion of I guardian ad litem. however. only served to complicate mailers. We continued to reiterate our objectio

ropriate defense team members. First, I would like to address the Section 2255 issue! As I stated in my December e letter, my understanding is that the Non-Prosecution A reement entered into between this Office and Mr. Epstein responds to Mr. Epstein's desire to reach global resolution of his state and federal crimin

ney Southern District of Florida First Assistant U.S. Attorney 7 99 N.E. 4 Street Miami, FL 33132 (305) 961-9100 DELIVERY BY FACSIMILE May 19, 2008 Jay P. Lefkowitz, Esq. Kirkland & Ellis LLP Citigroup Center 153 East 53rd Street New York, New York 10022-4675 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Mr. Lefkowitz, I am in

008 Jay P. Lefkowitz, Esq. Kirkland & Ellis LLP Citigroup Center 153 East 53rd Street New York, New York 10022-4675 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Mr. Lefkowitz, I am in receipt of your e-mail dated May 19, 2008 to the United States Attorney. The U.S. Attomey would like me to advise you that all communicatio

Re: Jaffrey Epstein Dear Jay; Several things have come to my attention that Seem contrary to your client intending ta abide by his obligations uder the Non-Prosecution A ereement. As you know, that agreement requires our Office to inform you of potential breaches to give you and your client the opportunity to respond

wards and the unanimous opinion of all of the attorneys present was in favor of prosecution. During the September t h meeting, your co-counsel, Mr. Lefkowitz, also offered a plea resolution. His offer, in essence, was that your client be subject to home confinement at his Palm Beach home, using private s

participation, yet he was not present. EFTA01659898 KENNETH STARR, ESQ. NOVEMBER 30, 2007 PAGE 4 OF 6 Instead, Mr. Epstein elected to ne otiate the Non-Prosecution A eement, and on September 12, 2007, counsel for the United States Garcia, and and counsel for Mr. Epstein (Messrs. Lefcourt Lefkowitz and Goldberg