Epstein Secrets

A/JOHNSON JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Plaintiffs v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant INTERVENORS' MOTION FOR STAY PENDING APPEAL Intervenors Roy Black, Martin Weinberg, Jay Lefkowitz, and Jeffrey Epstein hereby request that this Honorable Court stay its order of June 18, 2013 (Doc. 188), denying th

led to obtain those materials in discovery in the first instance. That question must be answered by reference to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26, which refers to Federal Rule of Evidence 501, which "empower[s] the federal courts to `continue the evolutionary development of [evidentiary] privileges!" Adkins v. Christie, 488 F.

ply with them. Dated: ___________ ____________________________________ Jeffrey Epstein Dated: ___________ ____________________________________ Roy Black, Esq. Counsel to Jeffrey Epstein R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY Dated: ___________ ____________________________________ By: A. Marie

evidence. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(f) (“The admissibility or inadmissibility of a plea, a plea discussion, and any related statement is governed by Federal Rule of Evidence 410.”). In any case, the victims could have been impeached regarding the possibility of their obtaining monetary damages through either a c

hereby states that he understands the conditions of this non-Prosecution Agreement and agrees to comply with them. - Dated:_ Jeffrey Epstein Dated:_ Roy Black, Esq. Counsel to Jeffrey Epstein R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY Dated:_ By: A. Marie Villafana Assistant United States Attorney Hays 4 o(

as evidence. See Fed! R. Crim. P. 11(f) (“The admissibility or inadmissibility of a plea, a plea discussion, and any related statement is governed by Federal Rule of Evidence 410.”). In any case, the victims could have been impeached regarding the possibility' of their obtaining monetary damages through either a ci