r materials from prison were self-authenticating under Rules 902(2) and 902(4) and that "Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 44(a)(1), incorporated into Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 27, accords with our analysis."). EFTA00068497 Page 6 III. Conclusion For the foregoing reasons, the Court should determine t

cing these materials pursuant to a grand jury subpoena, it is our understanding that this production will be treated as confidential consistent with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e). Notwithstanding the confidentiality of the enclosed materials and information, should you receive any request for disclosure

hallenge. "Although the Government did not present 71 EFTA00088873 evidence regarding the circumstances surrounding the seizure of the USB drive, Federal Rule of Evidence 901(b)(4) permits authentication based on Mlle appearance, contents, substance, internal patterns, or other distinctive characteristics of t

t court's decision whether to discharge or retain a Receiver); see also FTC. v. Standard Fin. Mgmt. Corp., 830 F.2d 404, 409 (1st Cir. 1987) (citing Federal Rule of Evidence 401's "having any tendency" definition of relevance in determining whether documents were "judicial documents"). 1' As we explain below, th

cing these materials pursuant to a grand jury subpoena, it is our understanding that this production will be treated as confidential consistent with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e). Notwithstanding the confidentiality of the enclosed materials and information, should you receive any request for disclosure

cing these materials pursuant to a grand jury subpoena, it is our understanding that this production will be treated as confidential consistent with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e). Notwithstanding the confidentiality of the enclosed materials and information, should you receive any request for disclosure

cing these materials pursuant to a grand jury subpoena, it is our understanding that this production will be treated as confidential consistent with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e). Notwithstanding the confidentiality of the enclosed materials and information, should you receive any request for disclosure

cing these materials pursuant to a grand jury subpoena, it is our understanding that this production will be treated as confidential consistent with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e). Notwithstanding the confidentiality of the enclosed materials and information, should you receive any request for disclosure

on and filing with the Court of a Stipulated Protective Order. The Stipulated Protective Order shall include a clawback provision in accordance with Federal Rule of Evidence 502 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5)(B), which shall require the Requesting Party to destroy or return all copies of any documen

led to obtain those materials in discovery in the first instance. That question must be answered by reference to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26, which refers to Federal Rule of Evidence 501, which "empower[s] the federal courts to `continue the evolutionary development of [evidentiary] privileges!" Adkins v. Christie, 488 F.

See United States Soto-Beniquez, 356 F.3d I, 52 (1st Cir.2004) ("Any possible prejudice to [defendant] from the government's non-compliance [with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32] was cured by the district court's two-week continuance to give defense counsel an ad- equate opportunity to respondlo the gove

evidence. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(f) (“The admissibility or inadmissibility of a plea, a plea discussion, and any related statement is governed by Federal Rule of Evidence 410.”). In any case, the victims could have been impeached regarding the possibility of their obtaining monetary damages through either a c

as evidence. See Fed! R. Crim. P. 11(f) (“The admissibility or inadmissibility of a plea, a plea discussion, and any related statement is governed by Federal Rule of Evidence 410.”). In any case, the victims could have been impeached regarding the possibility' of their obtaining monetary damages through either a ci