Epstein Secrets

and had been told that Epstein would not be eligible for work release. Accordingly, I provided my Notice of Breach, but was told by defense attorney Roy Black that, despite those specific conversations, USA Acosta himself agreed that Epstein would be eligible for any program 3 "Unwinding" was USA Acosta's

ire Epstein to elect either the 12/19/07 letter or not, but to make it clear in writing (Exhibits B-73 through B-82). On August 15, 2008, I wrote to Roy Black and Jay Lefkowitz confirming their position that the final agreement consisted only of the NPA and Addendum (Exhibit B-83). By discarding USA Acosta

her in touch with his attorney, Jack Goldberger; and Goldberger had his friend, Jim Eisenberg, serve as Individual #28's lawyer while Epstein paid Eisenberg's fees. Individual #28 later told Brad Edwards that someone (Epstein, Goldberger, or Eisenberg) told her that "the government" planned to take away

rey Epstein to Intervene and to Quash Grand Jury Subpoenas and Incorporated Memorandum of Law 6(e) Box #3 P-012056 Thru P-012088 Affidavit of Roy Black, F-sq. in Support of Motion of Jeffrey Epstein to Intervene and to Quash Grand Jury Subpoenas 6(e) Box #3 P-012089 Thru P-012129 United State

ith handwritten correction and typed guideline estimate Work product Deliberative process Box #2 P-009112 Thru P-009113 11/26/2008 Email from Ro Black to and m Jeffrey Epstein (work release) [pursuant to Court's Order, not being withheld as privileged — will be produced to opposing counsel upo

rvice of the subpoena, Ms.= retained the services of James Eisenberg, Esq. to represent her. Jeffrey Epstein paid for that representation. 3. Mr. Eisenberg communicated to me orally and in writing that Ms. would assert her Fifth Amendment privilege if she were forced to appear before the grand jury, an

ation of possible compelled disclosure of the Non-Prosecution Agreement B-74 8/6/2008 Email response from Bob Senior to Marie Villafaila regarding Roy Black's response to email B-75 8/12/2008 Email response from Bob Senior to Marie Villafana to request for conference call prior to call with Roy Black

8/2008 Villafaiia Slornan Email response to Villafafia's 10/8/08 email advising to send a copy of pleading to Roy and Jay 10/8/2008 Villafaiia, Roy Black, cc: Atkinson, Lee Lefkowitz Email thanking Villafaiia for fowarding United States' Response to Petitioners' Motion to Unseal the Non-Prosecution

Menchel with attached letter containing counter- proposal for plea to two years of 'supenised custody.' 9 8/24/2006- 10/24/2006 Entails betweenJim Eisenberg and Marie Villafana regarding #28 10 10/30/2006- 10/31-2006 Emails between Marie Vitt:liana and Guy Lewis regarding Lewis respresentation of Eps

On June 19, 2008, I sent an email to State Attorney Krischer advising him that we had spoken with Roy Black about wrapping up both the state and federal /times (Exhibit 68). I reminded State Attorney Krischer that the signed NPA required a plea to the curr

ire Epstein to elect either the 12/19/07 letter or not, but to make it clear in writing (Exhibits B-73 through B-82). On August 15, 2008, I wrote to Roy Black and Jay Lefkowitz confirming their position that the final agreement consisted only of the NPA and Addendum (Exhibit B-83). By discarding USA Acosta

contacted Jim Eisenberg, counsel for Individual # 28, who is Jane Doe #2 in the Jane Doe I United States suit. As noted on the attached chart, Mr. Eisenberg was paid for by Mr. Epstein. I told Mr. Eisenberg that I was preparing victim notification letters and needed to know if he was still representing

neth Starr Jay Lefkowitz Alan Dershowitz Lily Roy Black Jack Goldberger Mike Tein EFTA00206897 Guy L

(Jane Doe Petitioner in Civil action ???) • Bradley J. Edwards, Esq, Counsel for • Paul G. Cassell, Counsel for • Jay'. Howell, Counsel for • James Eisenberg, Esq., Original counsel for • Jeffrey Epstein, Defendant in state criminal action and party to USAO-SDFLA Non-Prosecution Agreement • Lilly Ann

ned between her and Epstein. Miller is represented by Jim Eisenberg, who is being paid by Epstein. Eisenberg has admitted to speaking regularly with Roy Black, who is Epstein's "behind the scenes" attorney, but Eisenberg insists that he is exercising independent judgment on behalf of Miller. Eisenberg has

n to any law enforcement officer about what happened between her and Epstein. Miller is represented by Jim Eisenberg, who is being paid by Epstein. Eisenberg has admitted to speaking regularly with Roy Black, who is Epstein's "behind the scenes" attorney, but Eisenberg insists that he is exercising indepe

ith handwritten correction and typed guideline estimate Work product Deliberative process Box #2 P-009112 Thru P-009113 11/26/2008 Email from Ro Black to A. and re Jeffrey Epstein (work release) [pursuant to Court's Order, not being withheld as privileged — will be produced to opposing counsel

imile: February 5, 2007 DELIVERY BY HAND James L. Eisenberg, Esq. 250 S Australian Ave, Ste 704 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5007 Re: n Dear Mr. Eisenberg: I am writing to clarify the ground rules for the interview with your client ("your client"), to occur February , 2007. As I mentioned earlier, M

igation, and this information is confidential pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e). In an abundance of caution, defense team members Roy Black and Martin Weinberg, two of the attorneys who represented Jeffrey Epstein during the investigation, are filing this pleading to provide notice to t

the investigation if the facts arc known or might attempt to escape if they have reason to believe certain indictments will issue. United States v. Eisenberg, 711 F.2d 959, 961 (11th Cir. 1983) (citing United States v. Procter & Gamble Co., 356 U.S. 677, 681 n.6 (1958)). Several of the "facts" contained

ng. Mr. Epstein's defense team, including yourself, Professor Dershowitz, former United States Attorney Guy Lewis, Ms. Lilly Ann Sanchez and Messrs. Roy Black, Jack Goldberger, Gerry Lefcourt and Jay Lefkowitz had the opportunity to review and raise objections to the terms of the Agreement. Again, no one r

the investigation if the facts are known or might attempt to escape if they have reason to believe certain indictments will issue. United States'. Eisenberg, 711 F.2d 959, 961 (11th Cir. 1983) (citing United States'. Procter & Gamble Co., 356 U.S. 677, 681 n.6 (1958)). Several of the "facts" contained i

aeseeaeeeeseesceateaeeeeas 11 In re Herald Co. v. Weisenberg, 59 N.Y.2d 378, 465 N.Y.S.2d 862 (1983) oo... ee

public countries. But Acosta and Epstein’s armada of attorneys — Harvard professor Alan Dershowitz, Jay Lefkowitz, Gerald Lefcourt, Jack Goldberger, Roy Black, Guy Lewis and former Whitewater special prosecutor Kenneth Starr — reached a consensus: Epstein would never serve time in a federal or state prison.