Epstein Secrets

ought the matter to an Assistant U.S. Attorney (AUSA), who opened a file with her supervisor’s approval and with the knowledge of then U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta. She worked with two FBI case agents to develop a federal case against Epstein and, in the course of the investigation, they discovered additional

ttle the case, the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment remained pending for more than a year. In 2017, President Donald Trump nominated Acosta to be Secretary of Labor. At his March 2017 confirmation hearing, Acosta was questioned only briefly about the Epstein case. On April 17, 2017,

thy substantive email about the case to her immediate supervisor, Lourie, Sloman, and Acosta on August 23, 2006, Lourie emailed Sloman: “Do you and Alex [Acosta] want her updating you on the case?” Sloman responded, “At this point, I don’t really care. If Alex says something then I’ll tell her to just run

e plea negotiations is drnmatically changed upon the return of an indictment. Once an indictment is returned, the Office does ttot intend to file a Superseding Information containing a lesser charge or to dismiss the case in favor of state prosecution. 58 Menchel told OPR that in his view, the two-year sentence esta

• • R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES A1TORNEY VIA FACSIMILE( Lilly Ann Sanchez, Esq. Fowler White Burnett 1395 Brickell Ave Fl 14 Miami Florida 33131-3300 Re: Jeffre

NN SANCIII2, ESQ. AUGUST 3, 2007 PAGE 2 Please let us know your client's decision by no later than August 17. I have conferred with U.S. Attorney Acosta who has asked me to communicate that the two-year term of incarceration is a non-negotiable minimum to vindicate a federal interest, and, at this ti

le plea negotiations is dramatically changed upon the return of an indictment. Once an indictment is returned, the Office does not intend to file a Superseding Information containing a lesser charge or to dismiss the case in favor of state prosecution. Exhibit 41 EFTA00224226 S • • LILLY ANN SANCIII2, ESQ. AUGU

ismiss the case in favor of state prosecution. Please let us know your client's decision by no later than . I have conferred with U.S. Attorney Acosta who has asked me to communicate that the two-year term of incarceration is non-negotiable, and, at this time, he is not inclined to meet with counse

ar term of incarceration is non-negotiable, and, at this time, he is not inclined to meet with counsel for Mr. Epstein. Sincerely, EFTA00189871 R. Alexander Acosta United States Attorney By: Assistant U.S. Attorney cc: R. Alexander Acosta EFTA00189872

le plea negotiations is dramatically changed upon the return of an indictment. Once an indictment is returned, the Office does not intend to file a Superseding Information containing a lesser charge or to dismiss the case in favor of state prosecution. Please let us know your client's decision by no later than . I

AM Document 361-49 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 2 of 3 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida t ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNIIVISTATESATIORNEY VIA FACSIMILE Lilly Ann Sanchez, Esq. Fowler White Burnett 1395 Brickell Ave Fl 14 Miami Florida 33131-3300 Re: Jeffrey

torney Southern District of Florida t ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNIIVISTATESATIORNEY VIA FACSIMILE Lilly Ann S

le plea negotiations is dramatically changed up6n the return of an indictmeht. Once an indictment is returned, the Office does not intend to file a Superseding Information containing a lesser charge or to dismiss the case in favor of state prosecution. 08-80736-CV-MARRA RFP WPB 001479 EFTA00184665 Case 9:08-cv-807

ad and explained to him. Epstein hereby states that he understands the conditions of this Non- Prosecution Agreement and agrees to comply with them. R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY Dated: By: A. MARIE VILLAFANA ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY Dated: JEFFREY EPSTEIN Dated: GERALD LEFCOURT, ESQ. COUNSEL TO JEFF

ement as reviewed by the U.S. ct Attorney Hi Jay — Here is the agreement with Alex’s edits. Thank you. <<070924 Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement w Acosta edits v2.pdf>> A. Marie Villafatia Assistant U.S. Attorney 900 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012620 070

ible plea negotiations is dramatically changed upon the return of an indictment. Once an indictment is returned, the Office does not intend to file a Superseding Information containing a lesser charge or to dismiss the case in favor of state prosecution. Please let us know your client’s decision by no later than August 1

Ile...LeneA nein Black srcbmck. Kornsparl & Stumpf EFTA00179082 U.S. Department Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY VIA FACSIMILE Lilly Ann Sanchez, Esq. Fowler White Burnett 1395 Brickell Ave Fl 14 Miami Florida 33131-3300 Re: Jeffre

ANN SANCHEZ, ESQ. AUGUST 3, 2007 PAGE 2 Please let us know your client's decision by no later than August 17. I have conferred with U.S. Attorney Acosta who has asked me to communicate that the two-year term of incarceration is a non-negotiable minimum to vindicate a federal interest, and, at this ti

le plea negotiations is dramatically changed upon the return of an indictment. Once an indictment is returned, the Office does not intend to file a Superseding Information containing a lesser charge or to dismiss the case in favor of state prosecution. EFTA00179083 LILLY ANN SANCHEZ, ESQ. AUGUST 3, 2007 PAGE 2 Pl

NN SANCIIEZ, ESQ. Aucusr 3, 2007 PAGE 2 Please let us know your client's decision by no later than August 17. 1 have conferred with U.S. Attorney Acosta who has asked me to communicate that the two-year term of incarceration is a non-negotiable minimum to vindicate a federal interest, and, at this ti

um to vindicate a federal interest, and, at this time, he is not inclined to meet with counsel for Mr. Epstein. cc: Roy Black Gerald B. Lefcourt R. Alexander Acosta Jeffrey Sloman Andrew Lourie A. Marie Villafalia Sincerely, R. Alexander Acosta United States Attorney Matthew Menchel Chief, Criminal Divisi

le plea negotiations is dramatically changed upon the return of an indictment. Once an indictment is returned, the Office does not intend to file a Superseding Information containing a lesser charge or to dismiss the case in favor of state prosecution. Exhibit 41 EFTA00226190