Epstein Secrets

s Munich San Francisco Washington. D.C. RFP MIA 000001 EFTA00209047 ConfidentiaL For Settlement Purposes Only, Pursuant to Rule 408. • • • R. Alexander Acosta October I0, 2007 Page 2 has taken regarding the role of the attorney representative and the settlement process for § 2255 claims pursuant to Para

Stem New York. New Yong 10022-4611 It Alexander Acosta United States Attorney's Office Southern Distri

ropriate defense team members. First, I would like to address the Section 2255 issue! As I stated in my December e letter, my understanding is that the Non-Prosecution A reement entered into between this Office and Mr. Epstein responds to Mr. Epstein's desire to reach global resolution of his state and federal crimin

u will recall that at one meeting you and raised the idea of Mr. Epstein hiring Sheriff's Deputies to guard him as equivalent to imprisonment. Mr. Acosta specifically rejected that suggestion. It is our understanding from the Sheriff's Office that Mr. Epstein is paying off-duty Sheriff's Deputies to

rights it has under the Non- Prosecution Agreement unless Mr. Epstein immediately ceases and desists from his breach of this Agreement. Sincerely, R. Alexander Acosta United States Attorney By: cc: Chief, Northern Division EFTA00212504

at recommendation. Community control must follow that term of incarceration. (Emphasis in original.) EFTA00212503 As I specified in that letter, the Non-Prosecution A reement calls for "confinement twenty-four hours a day." In response to that letter, agreed that he would revise the state plea agreement to inclu

erm. Accordingly, the United States Attorney's Office hereby provides notice of Mr. Epstein's breach of the Non-Prosecution Agreement. Sincerely, R. Alexander Acosta United States Attorney By: A. Marie VillafaRa Assistant United States Attorney cc: Karen Atkinson, Esq. EFTA00190591

-Prosecution Agreement. Sincerely, R. Alexander Acosta United States Attorney By: A. Marie VillafaRa

EI. R. TIN, ESQ. JULY 22, 2008 PAGE 2 object to the names on the list and chose not to make any objections. Accordingly, pursuant to the terms of the Non-Prosecution A reement as modified, Mr. Epstein and all of his representatives are required to treat and as "victims of an enumerated offense." Furthermore, Mr

o have him enter his plea on November 20. So we will plan to proceed on one that date.” October 18, 2007 email from Jay Lefkowitz to USA R. Alexander Acosta. ° On the same day, Mr. Lefkowitz confirmed with First Assistant Jeffrey H. Sloman that this postponement “ will not affect when Epstein begins serv

the SDFL offered, in my opinion, numerous and various reasonable modifications and accommodations which ultimately resulted in United States Attorney R. Alexander Acosta’s December 19, 2007 letter to Lilly Ann Sanchez. In that letter, the United States Attorney tried to eliminate all concerns which, quite frankly, the S

Re: Jaffrey Epstein Dear Jay; Several things have come to my attention that Seem contrary to your client intending ta abide by his obligations uder the Non-Prosecution A ereement. As you know, that agreement requires our Office to inform you of potential breaches to give you and your client the opportunity to respond

s by that time, we will deem the agreement to be rescinded and will proceed with the prosecution. There must be closure in this matter. Sincerely, R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY cc: First Assistant U.S. Attorney EFTA01659901

closure in this matter. Sincerely, R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY cc: First Assistant U.S

participation, yet he was not present. EFTA01659898 KENNETH STARR, ESQ. NOVEMBER 30, 2007 PAGE 4 OF 6 Instead, Mr. Epstein elected to ne otiate the Non-Prosecution A eement, and on September 12, 2007, counsel for the United States Garcia, and and counsel for Mr. Epstein (Messrs. Lefcourt Lefkowitz and Goldberg