Epstein Secrets

o related to the indictment. On September 7, 2007, Epstein's attorneys met with the U.S. Attorney, Drew Oosterbaan, Jeff Sloman, John McMillan, and I. Ken Starr presented federalism arguments, urging deferral to state prosecution. When those arguments failed, Epstein's attorneys slated that he wanted to enga

RNEY 3 Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-011819 EFTA00192865 U.S. Department of Justice Washington, D.C. 20530 June 23, 2008 Jay Lefkowitz„ Esq. Kenneth Starr, Esq. Kirkland and Ellis LLP 777 South Figueroa Street Los Angeles, CA 90017 Gentlemen: This Office has completed a thorough review of the U.S.

sterbaan, Jeff Sloman, John McMillan, and I. Ken Starr presented federalism arguments, urging deferral t

ime, Plaintiff Weal Palm Beach (EXCEPT NUS. PLAINTS'S CASES) (C) Anomeys Sinn Nana. Addrem, endTelephone Asti Robert C. losefsberg, EsqACatherine W. Ezell, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 25 W. Magic: St., Suite 800 mini"; Pt O9_ O41 sosq, ... Morro, Id) Check County When Anion Atom 0 MIAM6 DAVE 0 SICHR

is not inconsistent with our belief that the required scope of waiver was to a predicate offense in the singular, see, e.g., Mr.Acosta's letter to Ken Starr, December 4, 2007, p.2 ("were Mr. Epstein convicted at trial, the plaintiff-victims would not have to show that a violation of an enumeration secti

est that the plaintiff was injured, see United Stated, Scheidt, supra (finding each to be a separate element) and the letter from Mr. Acosta to Mr. Starr, supra December 4, 2007 letter at p.2 which agrees that Mr. Epstein can contest the injury element under the NPA ("were Mr. Epstein convicted at tr

U.S. PLAINTIPP CASES) S int. NTS 0 it Fey stein (c) Attorney's (Tina Nam, Address. nod Telephone Hornbill) Robert C..losefsbag, Esq./Katherine W. Ezell, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 25 W. Flag' er St., Suite 800 Miami Pf 1111(1 FILED b . County of Residence of Drst LiSted Dekria m nt U tales V

is not inconsistent with our belief that the required scope of waiver was to a predicate offense in the singular, see, e.g., Mr.Acosta's letter to Ken Starr, December 4, 2007, p.2 ("were Mr. Epstein convicted at trial, the plaintiff-victims would not have to show that a violation of an enumeration secti

e singular, see, e.g., Mr.Acosta's letter to Ken Starr, December 4, 2007, p.2 ("were Mr. Epstein convic

intiff West Palm Beach (EXCEPT IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES) ft Attorney's (Um Nome. Addieti. and Telepheee Nuanns) Robert'. Josefsberg, EsqJKatherine W. Ezell, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 25 W. Flagler St., Suite 800 Miami RI -4 I lft FILED County of Residency of Pint Listed Dcfcrient Uniretrebates VIE

entered his plea. This letter should then come from the attorney representative, and not from the Government, to avoid any bias. As you know, Judge Starr has requested a meeting with Assistant Attorney General Fisher to address what we believe is the unprecedented nature of the section 2255 component

Plaintiff West Palm Beach tExcErr IN U.S. PLAINTIff CASES) (e) Attorney's (Firm Nut. Aden= ad lambent Numbed Robert C. Josefsbergy Esq./Katherine W. Ezell, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 25 W. Flagler St., Suite 800 Minima SI 1111A O81 OD Check County Where Action Arose 0 MIAMI. DADE CI MONROE vt3 BR