Epstein Secrets

ed lawyers, including but not limited to Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz, former Independent Counsel and Solicitor General of the United States Kenneth Starr, just to name a few, entered into a global resolution of state and federal liabilities faced by your client (“the Agreement”) with the SDFL. Although

0)). Ultimately, you requested an independent review. Subsequent to the above-mentioned meeting, the SDFL received three letters from you and/or Mr. Starr which expanded on some of the themes announced in the December 14” meeting. Essentially, you portrayed the SDFL as trying to coerce’a plea to unknown

Re: Jaffrey Epstein Dear Jay; Several things have come to my attention that Seem contrary to your client intending ta abide by his obligations uder the Non-Prosecution A ereement. As you know, that agreement requires our Office to inform you of potential breaches to give you and your client the opportunity to respond

U.S. Department ofJustice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida November 30, 2007 DELIVERY BY FACSIMILE Kenneth W. Starr, Esq. Kirkland & Ellis LLP Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Mr. Starr: I write in response to your letter of November 28, 2007, to Assistant Attorney Ge

Southern District of Florida November 30, 2007 DELIVERY BY FACSIMILE Kenneth W. Starr, Esq. Kirkland & Ellis LLP Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Mr. Starr: I write in response to your letter of November 28, 2007, to Assistant Attorney General There are a number of issues that must be addressed, but I

participation, yet he was not present. EFTA01659898 KENNETH STARR, ESQ. NOVEMBER 30, 2007 PAGE 4 OF 6 Instead, Mr. Epstein elected to ne otiate the Non-Prosecution A eement, and on September 12, 2007, counsel for the United States Garcia, and and counsel for Mr. Epstein (Messrs. Lefcourt Lefkowitz and Goldberg

delivery of any such letter, however, it should only be made by I third party service, not by law enforcement agents. Finally, as you know, Judge Starr has requested' meeting with Assistant Attorney General Fisher to address what we believe is the unprecedented nature of the § 2255 component of the

ropriate defense team members. First, I would like to address the Section 2255 issue! As I stated in my December e letter, my understanding is that the Non-Prosecution A reement entered into between this Office and Mr. Epstein responds to Mr. Epstein's desire to reach global resolution of his state and federal crimin