Epstein Secrets

o related to the indictment. On September 7, 2007, Epstein's attorneys met with the U.S. Attorney, Drew Oosterbaan, Jeff Sloman, John McMillan, and I. Ken Starr presented federalism arguments, urging deferral to state prosecution. When those arguments failed, Epstein's attorneys slated that he wanted to enga

RNEY 3 Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-011819 EFTA00192865 U.S. Department of Justice Washington, D.C. 20530 June 23, 2008 Jay Lefkowitz„ Esq. Kenneth Starr, Esq. Kirkland and Ellis LLP 777 South Figueroa Street Los Angeles, CA 90017 Gentlemen: This Office has completed a thorough review of the U.S.

sterbaan, Jeff Sloman, John McMillan, and I. Ken Starr presented federalism arguments, urging deferral t

der the law that existed when the con uct took place has timeless and universal appeal." Kaiser Alum. & trt Corp . B mo 494 U.S. 827, 855 (1990) (Scalia, J., concurring). Id. at 265 (footnote omitted). Courts therefore apply the statute in effect at the time of the underlying conduct unless there is

Roth Senior Associate Deputy Attorney General EFTA00208769 05/28/2008 09:05 FAX 2026161239 DOJ/ODAC 06/27/2008 12' 18 FAX e003/013 UUe 'UV° Kenneth W. Starr May 27, 2008 VI A FACSIMILE (2021 513-11467 Ittotorahle Mark filip t)I!se,. thc :norney I •Illit.tti Sc:acs nglarittltalt tl: ittl4Ite? "fin

053U June 23, 2008 Jay Lefkowitz, Esq. Kenneth Starr, Esq. Kirkland and Ellis LLP Gentlemen: This O

olations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1591, 2422(b) and 2423(b). Since the limited review conducted by CEOS, two Supreme Court decisions—one authored by Justice Scalia and the other by Justice Thomas—have revitalized the bedrock principles that federal criminal statutes must be narrowly construed, that they may not

re any decision to prosecute is permitted. I1 08-80736-CV-MARRA RFP WPB 001664 EFTA00209843 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP AND ATTILJAIRU PARTNERSHIPS Kenneth W. Starr To Cell Writer Madly (213) 680-8440 [email protected] 777 South Figueroa Street Los Angeles, California 90017 (213)680'8400 www.kirkland.com

nt. See Tab 35, November 28, 2007 Letter from K. Starr to A. Fisher. 43. Late in the day on November 2

olations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1591, 2422(b) and 2423(b). Since the limited review conducted by CEOS, two Supreme Court decisions—one authored by Justice Scalia and the other by Justice Thomas—have revitalized the bedrock principles that federal criminal statutes must be narrowly construed, that they may not

ardy decision to engage in a surreptitious sexual relationship with a White House intern at a time when he knew he was under intense investigation by Kenneth Starr, a somewhat puritanical prosecutor and was subject to a lawsuit for sexual harassment by a vindictive woman who was represented by politically motiva

lies, and whose own lawyer said is an impressionable woman who sometimes fantasizes. On July 28, 1998, Monica Lewinsky’s lawyers struck a deal with Starr under which she was given total immunity in exchange for her cooperation and testimony. On July 29, 1998, the President’s lawyer announced that an ag

ater: “Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, did you enjoy the play?” Ifa defendant is factually innocent, there is no “other than that.” Listen to Justice Scalia on this subject: “This court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial b

r-old was endlessly compassionate, and that her community in Louisville, Kentucky, adored her. "We've known her for years, grew up together," one of Starr's friends told WHAS on Thursday. "She was a sweet person. She'd give you the shirt off her back if she had it. Food, if you need it, she was there.

regulation of guns much harder. In his powerful dissent in that case (District of Columbia u. Heller), Justice John Paul Stevens pointed out that Scalia's opinion was an act of extreme judicial activism — that for two centuries, federal courts had recognized that the government had the power to regul