Epstein Secrets

o related to the indictment. On September 7, 2007, Epstein's attorneys met with the U.S. Attorney, Drew Oosterbaan, Jeff Sloman, John McMillan, and I. Ken Starr presented federalism arguments, urging deferral to state prosecution. When those arguments failed, Epstein's attorneys slated that he wanted to enga

RNEY 3 Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-011819 EFTA00192865 U.S. Department of Justice Washington, D.C. 20530 June 23, 2008 Jay Lefkowitz„ Esq. Kenneth Starr, Esq. Kirkland and Ellis LLP 777 South Figueroa Street Los Angeles, CA 90017 Gentlemen: This Office has completed a thorough review of the U.S.

sterbaan, Jeff Sloman, John McMillan, and I. Ken Starr presented federalism arguments, urging deferral t

"; Pt O9_ O41 sosq, ... Morro, Id) Check County When Anion Atom 0 MIAM6 DAVE 0 SICHROB 0 BROWARD j1 PAW BEACH 0 MARTIN 0 ST. (ACE 0 INDIAN RIVER CI OKEECHOBEE HIGHLANDS II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION (Slam WI' FOR Ordy) 0 I 11S. Geninlicild V) 3 Want ()union PNiniR (U.S. Gnawer. Ha a Perry) DEFENDANTS

settlement of those claims, Epstein was represented by a large number of nationally and locally recognized lawyers, including, but not limited to, Kenneth Starr, Esq. and Jay Lefkowitz, Esq. of Kirkland & Ellis LLP, a global law _fun with approxitnately_1,500 lawyers; Alan_Dershowitz, the renowned Harvard La

lawyers, including, but not limited to, Kenneth Starr, Esq. and Jay Lefkowitz, Esq. of Kirkland & Ellis

OLVED Attorneys pi KnorM cot Check County Where Action Anne MIAMI. turn. MONROE fl FIRMWARE/ f/ PALM REACH MARTIN 0 ST. Well: n INDIAN RIVER 0 OKEECHOBEE 1110ELANDS II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION iPlateaa - X' Mont boa Dotal O 1 US. G•wremsem P 3 ledianolChicaliem Plaintiff (U.S. Goverainew Nota Ph

settlement of those claims, Epstein was represented by a large number of nationally and locally recognized lawyers, including, but not limited to, Kenneth Starr, Esq. and Jay Lefkowitz, Esq. of Kirkland & Ellis LLP, a global law _fun with approxitnately_1,500 lawyers; Alan_Dershowitz, the renowned Harvard La

lawyers, including, but not limited to, Kenneth Starr, Esq. and Jay Lefkowitz, Esq. of Kirkland & Ellis

INVOLVED Attorney% or Knows) ON fl ied Where Action Anise; 0 MIAMI. DAM 0 MONROE fl PROW *RD CI PALM BRACH CI MARTIN 0 ST. UMW O INDIAN RIVER 0 OKEECHOBEE 1110 FILANDS II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION aurora - re wows.. owri 0 1 US. G•venotent ledoo•Klugaion Matadi Govetomatt Net n Petty I 2 U.g Coves

is not inconsistent with our belief that the required scope of waiver was to a predicate offense in the singular, see, e.g., Mr.Acosta's letter to Ken Starr, December 4, 2007, p.2 ("were Mr. Epstein convicted at trial, the plaintiff-victims would not have to show that a violation of an enumeration secti

est that the plaintiff was injured, see United Stated, Scheidt, supra (finding each to be a separate element) and the letter from Mr. Acosta to Mr. Starr, supra December 4, 2007 letter at p.2 which agrees that Mr. Epstein can contest the injury element under the NPA ("were Mr. Epstein convicted at tr

est Palm Beach, FL 33401 (0 Cheek County Wheso Action Masa co MIAMI. DADS 0 MONROE 0 DROP/MID 4 PALM BEACH 0 MARTIN 0 ST. LUCIE 0 INDIAN RIVER 0 OKEECHOBEE HIGHLANDS II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION (lime err' Nom Box than III. C TIZENSIIIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES:rm. ea "X' In One Bet ro, annum En Danny Caen

is not inconsistent with our belief that the required scope of waiver was to a predicate offense in the singular, see, e.g., Mr.Acosta's letter to Ken Starr, December 4, 2007, p.2 ("were Mr. Epstein convicted at trial, the plaintiff-victims would not have to show that a violation of an enumeration secti

e singular, see, e.g., Mr.Acosta's letter to Ken Starr, December 4, 2007, p.2 ("were Mr. Epstein convic

, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (d) Cheek County Where Action Aran (' M IAMI. DADE 0 MONROE 0 IROWARD 08 PALM BEACH 0 MARTIN 0 ST. LUCK 0 INDIAN RIVER 0 OKEECHOBEE HIOHLANDS II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION (Moor art Om Boa Only) O I V.S. Ouctitmenl is 3 INdeallUoillon ?Wulff (U.S. Otnersusi Noes Petty) O 2 U