Epstein Secrets

o related to the indictment. On September 7, 2007, Epstein's attorneys met with the U.S. Attorney, Drew Oosterbaan, Jeff Sloman, John McMillan, and I. Ken Starr presented federalism arguments, urging deferral to state prosecution. When those arguments failed, Epstein's attorneys slated that he wanted to enga

RNEY 3 Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-011819 EFTA00192865 U.S. Department of Justice Washington, D.C. 20530 June 23, 2008 Jay Lefkowitz„ Esq. Kenneth Starr, Esq. Kirkland and Ellis LLP 777 South Figueroa Street Los Angeles, CA 90017 Gentlemen: This Office has completed a thorough review of the U.S.

sterbaan, Jeff Sloman, John McMillan, and I. Ken Starr presented federalism arguments, urging deferral t

uct was completed before 2006. 1. Congress Dld Not Intend To Apply Masha's Law Retroactively. It is axiomatic that "retroactivity is not favored," Bowen'. Georgetown Univ. Hosp., 488 U.S. 204, 208 (1988), and the "traditional presumption teaches that [an amended statute) does not govern absent clear

is not inconsistent with our belief that the required scope of waiver was to a predicate offense in the singular, see, e.g., Mr.Acosta's letter to Ken Starr, December 4, 2007, p.2 ("were Mr. Epstein convicted at trial, the plaintiff-victims would not have to show that a violation of an enumeration secti

est that the plaintiff was injured, see United Stated, Scheidt, supra (finding each to be a separate element) and the letter from Mr. Acosta to Mr. Starr, supra December 4, 2007 letter at p.2 which agrees that Mr. Epstein can contest the injury element under the NPA ("were Mr. Epstein convicted at tr

s, which is consistent with applicable law discussed more fully below herein. It is an axiom of law that "retroactivity is not favored in the law." Bowen, 488 U.S., at 208, 109 S.Ct., at 471 (1988). As eloquently stated in Landgraf I. USI Film Products 114 S.Ct. 1483, 1497, 511 U.S. 244, 265-66 (1994

is not inconsistent with our belief that the required scope of waiver was to a predicate offense in the singular, see, e.g., Mr.Acosta's letter to Ken Starr, December 4, 2007, p.2 ("were Mr. Epstein convicted at trial, the plaintiff-victims would not have to show that a violation of an enumeration secti

e singular, see, e.g., Mr.Acosta's letter to Ken Starr, December 4, 2007, p.2 ("were Mr. Epstein convic

s, which is consistent with applicable law discussed more fully below herein. It is an axiom of law that "retroactivity is not favored in the law." Bowen, 488 U.S., at 208, 109 S.Ct., at 471 (1988). As eloquently stated in Landgraf I. USI Film Products, 114 S.Ct. 1483, 1497, 511 U.S. 244, 265-66 (199

1.3400 INTERNATIONAL CHARITABLE S- ATINITNT PER00 Omar 27.2001 THROU3/1 Nanette. 30. 2001 ACCW47 MOW iilililiilillil Treemie meeleet illy LAST STArra/e1.7 000ber 26.2001 0100010 PRICE OE an Amour./ MCAT WOW 850 31.90000 27.181.00 11/05/01 10/31/01 SOW 46.648.44 11/05101 10/31/01 SOLD

83.939.84 12&itt61 1f/L$/o1 SOLD VANE 4,000 13.71440 123.410.48 12124/01 12/19/01 SOLD WISH -1.200 1126000 12616.54 12,24tol 12/19101 Bowen 12C 2.700 37.56460 101,601,42 02T 1619 EFTA01322956 t6i39ZZOO-V.L43 C) 0 m C in r _ ZOZPS£00 IN9 ANGS BEAR STEARNS Ofra SERVICING