Epstein Secrets

even when the information would incriminate the client "in the very case in which the Firm was engaged to provide criminal defense representation." Gerald B. Lefcourt, P.C. v. United States , 125 F.3d 79, 87 (2d Cir. 1997). In that case, Attorney Lefcourt refused to identify in an IRS reporting form a client who p

aged to provide criminal defense representation." Gerald B. Lefcourt, P.C. v. United States , 125 F.3d 79, 87 (2d Cir. 1997). In that case, Attorney Lefcourt refused to identify in an IRS reporting form a client who paid him more than $10,000 cash, and Lefcourt was fined $25,000. Lefcourt sought to avoid

y have known about the United States' attempts to locate those computers for at least two months, when a subpoena for the same items was served upon Paul Lavery, another private investigator who worked with Riley. This is not a situation where failure to abide by the Court's rules should be tolerated. III.

he State Attorney's Office, applying pressure against prosecuting the case. The team of attorneys included Mr. Black and his firm, Jack Goldberger, Gerald Lefcourt, and Professor Alan Dershowitz. F4 At some time after the possibility of obtaining a search warrant was discussed, Epstein hired the husband of the

Mr. Black and his firm, Jack Goldberger, Gerald Lefcourt, and Professor Alan Dershowitz. F4 At some time a

refers to as warran ff i ce. F6 Through the FBI's investigation, it was determined that at some point before the execution of the search a l and Paul Lavery, a private investigator, traveled to Epstein's house and collected the computers, which were later turned over to William Riley, the subpoenaed part

even when the information would incriminate the client "in the very case in which the Firm was engaged to provide criminal defense representation." Gerald B. Lefcourt, P.C. I United States , 125 F.3d 79, 87 (2d Cir. 1997). In that case, Attorney Lefcourt refused to identify in an IRS reporting form a client who pa

gaged to provide criminal defense representation." Gerald B. Lefcourt, P.C. I United States , 125 F.3d 79, 87 (2d Cir. 1997). In that case, Attorney Lefcourt refused to identify in an IRS reporting form a client who paid him more than $10,000 cash, and Lefcourt was fined $25,000. Lefcourt sought to avoid

y have known about the United States' attempts to locate those computers for at least two months, when a subpoena for the same items was served upon Paul Lavery, another private investigator who worked with Riley. This is not a situation where failure to abide by the Court's rules should be tolerated. III.

to 3501.15600 2006 0816 nt history 3501.1560)7 2006.0626 PaM Beach Poke Department eAdenceftracting report 3501.1560)8 2007.01.01 letter from Gerald Lefrourt to 3501.156009 2007.01.12 Letter from lames Eisenberg to 3501.156010 20(17.03.13 interneve notes 3501.156011 200703.13 intennew 302 3501.15

ripts 3501064065 2007.02.01 letter from Gerald Lefcourt 1 3501064066 2007.02.27 Testi 3501064067 200

riptaon 3501 134 COI 2005 11 16 Florida DAV I D indnidual summa f et Paul Lavwy 3501.07-037 2005.11.16 Florida DAVID. minsdual summary page for Paul Lavery 3501.134 033 3005.11.22 Leah Noels business report rout for Do Yotrutlf a Favor Inc 3501 I OM 3005.1.22 Leah Nexis person moon results for Pau

et with counsel for Mr. Epstein. Sincerely, R. Alexander Acosta United States Attorney ...••••••• By: Chief, Criminal Division cc: Roy Black Gerald B. Lefcourt R. Alexander Acosta EFTA00179084 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA IN RE GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS DUCES TECUM NUMBERS OLY

aged to provide criminal defense representation." Gerald B. Lefcourt, P.C. v. United States, 125 F.3d 79, 87 (2d Cir. 1997). In that case, Attorney Lefcourt refused to identify in an IRS reporting form a client who paid him more than $10,000 cash, and Lefcourt was fined $25,000. Lefcourt sought to avoid

have known about the United States' attempts to locate those computers for at least two months, when a subpoena for the same items was served upon Paul Lavery, another private investigator who worked with Riley. This is not a situation where failure to abide by the Court's rules should be tolerated. III.

(954) 467-8204 EFTA00226639 LAW OFFICES OF Gurtaban B. Laconic, PG A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 148 CAST 78,- STREET NEW YORE., NEW YORK 10021 GERALD B. LEFCOURT IlifCOUR@WCOUSIAT COM SHERYL E. REICH roichadcouriwtoum RENATO C. STABILE Pabil*Ellefoourtlawcorn FAITH A. FRIE0mAN iMatnenalelowitaw Torn VI

8,- STREET NEW YORE., NEW YORK 10021 GERALD B. LEFCOURT IlifCOUR@WCOUSIAT COM SHERYL E. REICH roichadc

pstein's home, they found computer monitors and equipment, but no CPUs. From the continued investi ,ation we know that the computers were removed by Paul Lavery, a private investigator, with the help of one of our targets. Now that we know that Lavery removed the computers, I would like to subpoena the comp