Epstein Secrets

aimen1 and *pm to tomply wkihztote. R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA VinTED STATER ATTOMEY A. MARE VII1APA A ASSISTANT VS. ATTORNEY Dáie.1 ril - Os& Dw.* GERALD LEPCOURT,ESO. COUNSEL TO MPFREY MIEN LILLY ANN SANCHEZ. ESQ. ATTORNEY POR WEM ETSTEN Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-011814 EFTA00192860 By signing this

MARIE VTLLAFARA ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY OERALD LEFCOURT, ESQ. COUNSEL TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN LILLY ANN SANC

with them. R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY Dated: By: Dated: 77P/4" Dated: Dated: A. MARIE VTLLAFARA ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY OERALD LEFCOURT, ESQ. COUNSEL TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN LILLY ANN SANCHEZ, ESQ. ATTORNEY FOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN Page 7 of 7 Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-01 1810 EFTA001

Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/26/2009 Page 8 of 36 B. Masha's Law Does Not Apply To This Case. The presumption against retroactivity and the Ex Post Facto clause preclude application of Masha's Law in this case, where the alleged predicate conduct was completed before 2006. 1. Congress Dld Not Intend

g (US: and 'I'll' DEF: Lilly Sanchez and Gerald Lefcourt). 6/26/2007--Meeting (US: , DEF: Alan Dershowi

Nova York San Francom wahnngion. O C EFTA01718423 JEFFREY EPSTEIN Timeline-Summary 2/20/2007--Meeting (US: and 'I'll' DEF: Lilly Sanchez and Gerald Lefcourt). 6/26/2007--Meeting (US: , DEF: Alan Dershowitz, Roy Black, Gerald Lefcourt and Lilly Sanchez). 7/26/2007--Meeting (US: (conference call), and

ot be 2 EFTA01718491 05/16/2008 11:16 FAX 05/18/08 FRI 11:09 FAX @004/006 1004 so novel as to implicate the so-called "clear statement rule," the Ex Post Facto clause, or the Due Process clause. As with the other legal issues, Mr. Acosta may elect to proceed with the case. Absence of coercion. With respect

ictment. One of those cases was argued by Gerald Lefcourt — one of Epstein's attorneys. For those reasons,

rge number of uncharged overt acts, those uncharged acts can serve as a variance from/amendment to the Indictment. One of those cases was argued by Gerald Lefcourt — one of Epstein's attorneys. For those reasons, I have kept most of the overt acts from the original indictment (excluding those related to the Ja

ct future behavior *1039 and that the question is so vague as to be meaning- less. That calls into play the concept our Court of Appeals applied to the Ex Post Facto r Clause (albeit in a different con t from the present one) in United States Sutton, 521 F.2d 1385, 1390- (7th ir.1975) (quoting United State

akon Ave., Suite 400 * West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 820-8711 . Facsimile: (561) 820-8777 August 16, 2007 VIA FACSIMILE Gerald Lefcourt, Esq. Gerald P. Lefcourt, P.C. 148 Bast 78th Street New York, NY 10021 Re: Subpoena to Custodian of Records. ‘Dear Mr. Lefcourt: , < I write in response to your letter of

FACSIMILE Gerald Lefcourt, Esq. Gerald P. Lefcourt, P.C. 148 Bast 78th Street New York, NY 10021 Re: Subpoena to Custodian of Records. ‘Dear Mr. Lefcourt: , < I write in response to your letter of July 18, 2007 regarding the grand jury subpoena issued SF to the Custodian of Records for NES, LLC. Ihave

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012671 2] 004/006 05/16/2008 11:16 FAX ioe 05/16/08 FRI 11:09 FAX 80 novel as to implicate the so-called “‘clear statement rule,” the Ex Post Facto clause, or the Due Process clause. As with the other legal issues, Mr. Acosta may elect to proceed with the case. Absence of coercion. With respect

As you put it, your group has a "combined 250 years experience" to my fourteen. The agreement itself was signed by Mr. Epstein, Ms. Sanchez, and Mr. Lefcourt, whose experience speaks for itself. You and I spent hours negotiating the terms, including when to use "a" versus "the" and other minutiae. When y

be 2 EFTA00289786 06/16/2008 11:16 FAI 06/18/08 FRI 11:09 FAX bliOS/006 1:9004 so novel as to implicate the so-called "clear statement rule," the Ex Post Facto clause, or the Due Process clause. As with the other legal issues, Mr. Acosta may elect to proceed with the case. Absence of coercion. With respect