Epstein Secrets

aimen1 and *pm to tomply wkihztote. R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA VinTED STATER ATTOMEY A. MARE VII1APA A ASSISTANT VS. ATTORNEY Dáie.1 ril - Os& Dw.* GERALD LEPCOURT,ESO. COUNSEL TO MPFREY MIEN LILLY ANN SANCHEZ. ESQ. ATTORNEY POR WEM ETSTEN Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-011814 EFTA00192860 By signing this

MARIE VTLLAFARA ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY OERALD LEFCOURT, ESQ. COUNSEL TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN LILLY ANN SANC

with them. R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY Dated: By: Dated: 77P/4" Dated: Dated: A. MARIE VTLLAFARA ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY OERALD LEFCOURT, ESQ. COUNSEL TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN LILLY ANN SANCHEZ, ESQ. ATTORNEY FOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN Page 7 of 7 Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-01 1810 EFTA001

elsewhere did expressly. In these circumstances, the traditional Ma against surplusage and redundancy apply with double force. See, e.g., Duncan'. Walker 533 U.S. 167, 174 (2001). The "legal disability" language in § 2255(b) should be interpreted to reference classic legal disabilities like insanity,

o tell the Justice Department that " Letter from Gerald Lefcourt & Alan Dershowitz, July 6, 2007 to U.S. Atty.'s O

the Justice Department that " Letter from Gerald Lefcourt & Alan Dershowitz, July 6, 2007 to U.S. Atty.'s O

119-KAM (S.D. Fla. Mar. 19, 2010) (excerpts attached as Exhibit 29) Later, Dershowitz would write to tell the Justice Department that " Letter from Gerald Lefcourt & Alan Dershowitz, July 6, 2007 to U.S. Atty.'s Office for the S.D. Fla (attached as Exhibit 30). Now, nearly a decade later, there should be no doubt

" ld. at 1260. That is essentially what Prof. Dershowitz seeks here. Furthermore, permissive intervention under Rule 24(b) is also appropriate. See Walker. Jim Dandy Co., 747 F.2d 1360, 1365 (11th Cir. 1984). IV. These facts are distinguishable from those presented by the earlier intervenor motion f

and agrees to comply with than. R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UN: TED STATES ATTORNEY Dated: BY: Dated: Dated: Dated: ifrja JEFFREY EPSTEIN GERALD LF,FCOURT, &SQ. COUNSEL TO JEFFREY EPSTELN LILLY ATTORNEY FOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN EFTA00229984 • • ..... . 1 lwm.+77 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 48-5

ion Agreement and agrees to comply nith thorn. R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY Dated: Dated: i_1" Dated: DOA EY: IkEISIET TNAD A GERALD LEFCOLIRT, ESQ. COUNSEL TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN LILLY ANN SANCHEZ, ESQ. ATTORNEY FOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN EFTA00229982 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 48-5 Entered

— Dated: Dated: By: ASSISTANT U.S. TEO GERALD LEFCOURT, ESQ. COUNSEL TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN LILLY ANN SANC

When other plea arrangements have been negotiated in violation of federal law, they have been stricken by the courts. For example, United States v. Walker, 98 F.3d 944 (7th Cir. 1996), held that where a sentence on a new crime could not run concurrently with a probation revocation the defendant was th

even when the information would incriminate the client "in the very case in which the Firm was engaged to provide criminal defense representation." Gerald B. Lefcourt, P.C. v. United States , 125 F.3d 79, 87 (2d Cir. 1997). In that case, Attorney Lefcourt refused to identify in an IRS reporting form a client who p

aged to provide criminal defense representation." Gerald B. Lefcourt, P.C. v. United States , 125 F.3d 79, 87 (2d Cir. 1997). In that case, Attorney Lefcourt refused to identify in an IRS reporting form a client who paid him more than $10,000 cash, and Lefcourt was fined $25,000. Lefcourt sought to avoid

this issue when a defendant tried to disqualify prosecutors who had seen four documents that the defense alleged were privileged. United States v. Walker , 2007 WL 1743273 (2d Cir. Jun. 18, 2007). The court wrote: Even assuming the documents (or the handful of corrections and clarifications handwritt

even when the information would incriminate the client "in the very case in which the Firm was engaged to provide criminal defense representation." Gerald B. Lefcourt, P.C. I United States , 125 F.3d 79, 87 (2d Cir. 1997). In that case, Attorney Lefcourt refused to identify in an IRS reporting form a client who pa

gaged to provide criminal defense representation." Gerald B. Lefcourt, P.C. I United States , 125 F.3d 79, 87 (2d Cir. 1997). In that case, Attorney Lefcourt refused to identify in an IRS reporting form a client who paid him more than $10,000 cash, and Lefcourt was fined $25,000. Lefcourt sought to avoid

d this issue when a defendant tried to disqualify prosecutors who had seen four documents that the defense alleged were privileged. United States I Walker , 2007 WL 1743273 (2d Cir. Jun. 18, 2007). The court wrote: Even assuming the documents (or the handful of corrections and clarifications handwritt

alleged conduct. See, e.g., Letter from Gerald B. Lefcourt to a EFTA00299028 USAO-SDFL, June 25, 2007 (a

the many contradictory sworn statements and inconsistencies in the various witness accounts of Mr. Epstein's alleged conduct. See, e.g., Letter from Gerald B. Lefcourt to a EFTA00299028 USAO-SDFL, June 25, 2007 (attached as Exhibit 1). Those presentations also included detailed statutory analysis and discussion

ing in United States v. Walker, 98 F.3d 944 (761 Cir. 1996) — the case on which Petitioners primarily rely -- is entirely confused and off-base. In Walker, the issue was whether defendant, who was serving a sentence for a federal parole violation when he was indicted on a new federal charge, was entit

et with counsel for Mr. Epstein. Sincerely, R. Alexander Acosta United States Attorney ...••••••• By: Chief, Criminal Division cc: Roy Black Gerald B. Lefcourt R. Alexander Acosta EFTA00179084 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA IN RE GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS DUCES TECUM NUMBERS OLY

aged to provide criminal defense representation." Gerald B. Lefcourt, P.C. v. United States, 125 F.3d 79, 87 (2d Cir. 1997). In that case, Attorney Lefcourt refused to identify in an IRS reporting form a client who paid him more than $10,000 cash, and Lefcourt was fined $25,000. Lefcourt sought to avoid

efendant tried to disqualify prosecutors who had seen four documents that the defense alleged were privileged. -19- EFTA00179118 United States v. Walker, 2007 WL 1743273 (2d Cir. Jun. 18, 2007). The court wrote: Even assuming the documents (or the handful of corrections and clarifications handwritte

d Epstein would begin to masturbate both himself and the woman. But "the woman referred to in the police report wasn't in the country at the time," Lefcourt said Wednesday, referring to the affidavit. "I do know that it was impossible to have happened the way it did." Prosecutor Lanna Belohlavek could n

ein in prison for 18 months, followed by house arrest. "The plea conference will be moved to March, but it will be resolved, we believe," attorney Gerald Lefcourt said by phone. Although he declined to give a reason, Lefcourt said the date change was agreed to by both the defense and the prosecution. Mike Ed

6: Nan Cannon styled by Linea Mechene: sap and pants by Delco & Gabbana, from Dolce & Gabbono. Beverly HI& tems-BY by Wendy Wale.. from %%reedy Walker, LA: ;noes oy Jimmy Choo. from Jimrr CM°. Beset& Has. ***** 276-77: Ben Nieck's Guess shirt from Guess stores nosonwido. or go so weneguessrom, V