Epstein Secrets

Jeffrey H. Sloman Ic Jane Kreusler•Walsh Deanna K. Shullman U.S. Attorney'S Office Bradley J. Edwards James B. Lake Hon. Jeffrey J. Colbath Jack A. Goldberger Diana Martin Spencer T. Kuvin Rebecca Mercier Vargas R. Alexander Acosta EFTA00233335 DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH

rnntent is doing its job," IS attorney Deanna Shullman said. "There is great public interest in how everybody in this rage is doing their job." Goldberger argued that the confidential agreement Epstein struck with federal prosecutors should remain confidential. Included in it, Goldberger said, are

to request a rehear- ing with the 4th District Court of Appeal. Absent that, it will be- come public. Epstein's local criminal defense attorney Jack Goldberger did not return a call seeking comment. Epstein's own attorneys, in federal filings, have See EPSTEIN, 66 ► Epstein Attorneys for the Palm Bea

dividuals referred to in paragraph. (7) sups, elect to Me suit pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255, Epstein will not contest the jurisdiction oftheUtrited States District Court fortbe Southern District *Merida over his person and/or the subject matter ,andEp stein waives bisrightto contemliability and also waives hi-slight

el but he indicated that he could not accept service as he no longer represents her. See McCawley Decl. at Exhibit 6, Electronic Correspondence with Jack Goldberger, at Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A., in West Palm Beach, Florida. In other litigation relating to Jeffrey Epstein, both and asserted their f

at Exhibit 6, Electronic Correspondence with Jack Goldberger, at Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A., in West

Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 160 Filed 05/25/16 Page 1 of 12 t1nited States District Court Southern District of New York Plaintiff, Case No.: 15-cv-07433-RWS v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. PLAINTIFF'S REDACTED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO S

s sentenced on June 30, 2008. In accordance with the terms of the Non-Prosecution Agreement, later that day, Special Agent and I met with Attorneys Jack Goldberger and Michael Tein and provided them with a written list of the 32 identified victims. Since the entry of the plea and sentencing, a number of concer

day, Special Agent and I met with Attorneys Jack Goldberger and Michael Tein and provided them with a writte

ff—which they did not—§ 2255 only authorizes suit based on predicate convictions under certain federal statutes. . ." (Id. at 21 (emphasis added).) States District Court and shall recover the actual damages such person sustains and the cost of the suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee. Any person as described i

st Flagler Street, Suite 800 Miami, FL 33130 305 358-2800 Fax: 305 358-2382 [email protected] [email protected] Counsel for Plaintiff Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 561-659-8300 Fax: 561-835-8691

ry, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. One Clearlake Centre, Suite 1400 250 Australian Ave S. West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5015 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Mr. Goldberger: Pursuant to the terms of the Non-Prosecution Agreement, the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida hereby provides y

tiff—which they did not—§ 2255 only authorizes suit based on predicate convictions under certain federal statutes..:' (Id. at 21 (emphasis added).) States District Court and shall recover the actual damages such person sustains and the cost of the suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee. Any person as described i

were already pending against lender in bankruptcy adversary proceeding. Fed. Rules Civ.Proc.Rule 23(bX3), 28 U.S.C.A. ARGUED: Daniel P. Shapiro, Goldberg, Kohn, Bell, Black, Rosenbloom & Moritz, Ltd, Chicago, Illinois, for Appellant. Gil- bert Scott Bagnell, Bagnell & Eason, L.L.C., Columbia, South

ages and declar- atory injunction relief arising from a pre- liminary investigation into possible viola- tions of the Voting Rights Act. The Unit- ed States District Court for the Northern District of California, Spencer Williams and Stanley A. Weigel, M., dismissed injunction claims and granted summary judgment in

nishment for downloading and uploading child pornography, the greater the customer demand for it and so the more will be produced. United States' Goldberg. 491 F.3d 668. 672 (7th Cr.) (citations omitted), cert. denied,128 S.Ct. 666 (2007); see also Ge. 501 F.3d at 261 ("deterring the production of ch

7, 1978. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied in No. 77-1695 July 8 and in No. 77-1682 July 24, 1978. Defendants were convicted in the Unit- ed States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, H. Kenneth Wangelin, J., of violating the Mann Act, and they appealed. The Court of Appeals, Gibson, Chief