ff—which they did not—§ 2255 only authorizes suit based on predicate convictions under certain federal statutes. . ." (Id. at 21 (emphasis added).) States District Court and shall recover the actual damages such person sustains and the cost of the suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee. Any person as described i

tiff—which they did not—§ 2255 only authorizes suit based on predicate convictions under certain federal statutes..:' (Id. at 21 (emphasis added).) States District Court and shall recover the actual damages such person sustains and the cost of the suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee. Any person as described i

lid of the attorney representative. As a result, on October 29, 2007, the parties executed an A um wherein it was mutually agreed that former ' States District Court Judge Edward B. would serve as the independent third-party. Judge selected the venerable law firm of Podhurst and Josefsberg to represent the app

re. Reference: 31E-MM-108062 Serial 19 Enclosure(s): Enclosed for Miami is the server copy of the referenced Grand Jury subpoena issued by lil ted States District Court, Southern District of Florida on 10/06/2006 and served at the on 10/16/2006. Details: On 10/16/2006, SA received from sa.via Federal Ex ress d

Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 160 Filed 05/25/16 Page 1 of 12 t1nited States District Court Southern District of New York Plaintiff, Case No.: 15-cv-07433-RWS v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. PLAINTIFF'S REDACTED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO S

tion of the attorney representative. As a result, on October 29, 2007, the parties executed an Addendum wherein it was mutually agreed that former States District Court Judge Edward B. would serve as the independent third-party. Judge selected the venerable law firm of Podh r nd Josefsberg to represent the appro

ages and declar- atory injunction relief arising from a pre- liminary investigation into possible viola- tions of the Voting Rights Act. The Unit- ed States District Court for the Northern District of California, Spencer Williams and Stanley A. Weigel, M., dismissed injunction claims and granted summary judgment in

7, 1978. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied in No. 77-1695 July 8 and in No. 77-1682 July 24, 1978. Defendants were convicted in the Unit- ed States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, H. Kenneth Wangelin, J., of violating the Mann Act, and they appealed. The Court of Appeals, Gibson, Chief

dividuals referred to in paragraph. (7) sups, elect to Me suit pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255, Epstein will not contest the jurisdiction oftheUtrited States District Court fortbe Southern District *Merida over his person and/or the subject matter ,andEp stein waives bisrightto contemliability and also waives hi-slight

Records Custodian: Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-000430 EFTA00227810 0 r . cn c" Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-00043I EFTA00227811 th. eted States District Court SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TO: SUBPOENA TO TESTIFY BEFORE GRAND JURY FG.I 07-103(WPB)-Tues./No. OLY-56 SUBPOENA FOR: PERSON DOCUMENTS OR OBJ

e: EFTA01660323 • • APPENDIX A DOCUMENT INVENTORY The documents submitted are as follows: Signature of Records Custodian: EFTA01660324 ted States District Court SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TO SUBPOENA TO TESTIFY BEFORE GRAND JURY FGJ 07-103(WPB)-Tues./No. OLY-59 SUBPOENA FOR: PERSON DOCUMENTS OR OBJE

th,.ted States District Court SOUTHERN DISTRIcr OF FLORIDA TO: SUBPOENA TO TESTIFY BEFORE GRAND JURY FGJ 07-103(WPB)-Tues./No. OLY-56 SUBPOENA FOR; PERSON DOCUMENTS OR OBJ