Epstein Secrets

y, Florida aboard the Gulfstream aircraft owned by Hyperion Air, Inc. (192) On or about May 1, 2004, Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN, SARAH KELLEN, and NADIA IVIARCINKOVA traveled from New York, New York to Palm Beach County, Florida aboard the Boeing 727 aircraft owned by JEGE, INC. (193) On or about Mai14, 2004, De

ow many telephone calls have you been able to document between Jane Doe #16 and Kellen? Between Jane Doe #16 and Ross? And between Jane Doe #16 and Marcinkova? 8. What was the sexual activity that Jane Doe #16 and JE engaged in that also violated Fl. Stat. 794.05? [Sexual intercourse between an adult ov

raft owned by JEGE, INC. (213) On or about February 10, 2005, Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN, SARAH KELLEN, ADRIANA ROSS, a/k/a "Adriana Mucinska," and NADIA 35 EFTA00192725 MARCINKOVA traveled•fromNew York, New York to Palm Beach County, Florida, aboard the Boeing 727 aircraft owned by JEGE, INC. (2

STEIN employed L.G. to perform, among other things, services as a personal assistant. 3! '3 Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN and SARAH KELLEN paid T.M., H.R., and A.F. to perform, among other things, recruiting services. 4. Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN owned a property located at 358 El Brillo Way, Palm B

with them. (b) It was further a part of the conspiracy that Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN, SARAH KELLEN, and ADRIANA ROSS, a/k/a "Adriana Mucinska," NADIA MARCINKOVA, and other participants would make payments to, or cause payments to be made to, minor females in exchanger engaging in lewd conduct. (c) It was f

craft owned by JEGE, INC. (213) On or about February 10, 2005, Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN, SARAH KELLEN, ADRIANA ROSS, a/k/a "Adriant ucinska," and NADIA 35 EFTA00191758 MARCINKOVA traveled from New York, New York to Palm Beach County, Florida, aboard the Boeing 727 aircraft owned by JEGE, (214)

(213) On or about February 10, 2005, Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN, SARAH KELLEN, ADRIANA ROSS, a/k/a "Adriant ucinska," and NADIA 35 EFTA00191758 MARCINKOVA traveled from New York, New York to Palm Beach County, Florida, aboard the Boeing 727 aircraft owned by JEGE, (214) On or about February 21, 2005,

EPSTEIN employed L.G. to perform, among other things, services as a personal assistant. 3. Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN and SARAH KELLEN paid T.M., H.R., and A.F. to pe orrn, among other things, recruiting services. 4. Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN owned a property located at 358 El Brillo Way, Palm B

aircraft owned by Hyperion Air, Inc. (204) On or about November 18, 2004, Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN, SARAH KELLEN, a/k/a "Adriana Mucinska," and NADIA MARCINKOVA traveled from Teterboro, New Jersey to Palm Beach County, Florida aboard the Gulfstream aircraft owned by Hyperion Air, Inc. (205) On or about Dece

ream aircraft owned by Hyperion Air, Inc. I 11 (225) On or about September 29, 2005, Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN, • a/k/a "Adriana Mucinslca," and NADIA MEN. traveled from Teterboro, New Jersey to Palm Beach County, Florida aboard the Gulfstream aircraft owned by Hyperion Air, Inc. All in violatio

(224) On or about September 18, 2005, Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN, SARAH KELLEN, and-, a/k/a "Adriana Mucinska," traveled from 37 EFTA00225803 MARCINKOVA traveledfrom New York, New York to Palm Beach County, Florida, aboard the Boeing 727 aircraft owned by JEGE, INC. (214) On or about February 21, 20

dant JEFFREY EPSTEIN employed L.G. to perform, among other things, services as a personal assistant. 1) Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN and paid T.M., H.R., and A.F. to perform, among other things, recruiting services. 4. Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN owned a property located at 358 El Brillo Way, Palm B

e #10. 17 placed a Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-013466 EFTA00230371 (75) In or around the last hal f of 2004, Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN and NADIA MARCINKOVA engaged in oral sex and sexual intercourse in the presence of Jane Doe #9, who was then a seventeen-year-old girl. (76) In or around the last half

f of 2004, Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN and NADIA MARCINKOVA engaged in oral sex and sexual intercourse in the

st hal f of 2004, Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN and NADIA MARCINKOVA engaged in oral sex and sexual interco

FFREY EPSTEIN. employed L.G. to perform, among other things, services as a personal assistant. Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN and if -.4' paid T. M., H.R., and A.F. to perform, among other things, recruiting services. 4. Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN owned a property located at 358 El Brillo Way, Palm B

rther reveal that A.H. viewed her interactions with Appellant (both sexual and non-sexual), as well as her sexual interactions with a female named "Nadia," as consensual and entirely self-interested: 36 EFTA00798156 • A.H. Tr. 15:1-21 (A.H. telling Recarey that Appellant would pay her to spend tim

8 reporting to police that "most of the girls lied" to Appellant about their ages). • J.L. Dep. 15:25-17:2 (woman testifying that she was told by H.R. that she had to be over 18 to massage Appellant, so she lied and claimed to be 19 because she wanted to make money). • F.P. Tr. 5:5-8 (woman telli

en took proactive steps to ensure that Appellant did not know that they were underage when he hired them to provide massages: • H.R. Tr. 12:13-21 (H.R. telling police that she lied to Appellant and told him that she was 18 when she was only 17, and further 14 Notably, the age of consent under Flor

that she’s from New York and she travels with Jeffrey, but I think I met her one time, if that's the girl that rings the bel], you know, in my head. Nadia I think is that one person I met one time. Page 34 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012315 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 24 22 23 24 25 Oo On DM FP W NY FH bt ie! uw 8 2

has the constitutional authority to refuse to enforce unconstitutional laws." Id. at 53. The opinion concluded that “if the President chooses to sign H.R. 3792, he would be constitutionally authorized to decline to enforce" the constitutionally objectionable section. Id. at 38. 4) Issues Raised by Sec

re the Supreme Court." Id. at 578. Congressional Materials 1) The President's Suspension of the Competition in Contracting Act is Unconstitutional, H.R. Rep. No. 138, 99th Cong., Ist Sess. (1985): The House Committee on Government Operations concluded thatthe President lacked the authority to refuse

:12,21 193:8 62:13,18 67:2 69:24 90:25,25 92:11,14 97:13,14 101:5 115:8 132:19 181:13,15 181:16 183:7 184:10 136:2 manufactu... 11:23 Marcinkova 107:14 135:2 135:4 149:4 157:11 Marissa 189:19,20 mark 114:17 115:17 121:2,13 125:11 141:8 149:6 157:9,19,21 158:7,8 169:23 170:13,14

16 apply to him or how did that work? 17 A. Oh, no, no, no. It's -- No. He wouldn't 18 be involved in that type of activity. You apply to 19 H.R. and you interview with the Director of 20 Operations or the Chief Pilot. You know, he 21 wouldn't. 22 O. So you start with Wexner in 1988. 23