Epstein Secrets

lying pressure against prosecuting the case. The team of attorneys included Mr. Black and his firm, Jack Goldberger, Gerald Lefcourt, and Professor Alan Dershowitz. Fa As explained in the Declaration of Joseph Recarey, Epstein knew of the state investigation by the first week of October, 2005. On October 18, 2

Goldberger, Gerald Lefcourt, and Professor Alan Dershowitz. Fa As explained in the Declaration of Joseph Re

Jack Goldberger, Gerald Lefcourt, and Professor Alan Dershowitz. Fa As explained in the Declaration o

ccordingly, it is a well-recognized principle that courts should not intervene in the grand jury process absent compelling reason. United States v. Dionisio , 410 U.S. 1, 16-18 (1973). A district court also should be mindful of a target's attempts to "saddle a grand jury with mini-trials and preliminary

humer. Goldberger is one of five attorneys Epstein has retained since he became the subject of an investigation, Edmondson said. Among the others: Alan Dershowitz, the well-known Harvard law professor and author, who is a friend of Epstein. Dershowitz could not be reached for comment. Police said the woman w

f an investigation, Edmondson said. Among the others: Alan Dershowitz, the well-known Harvard law professor and author, who is a friend of Epstein. Dershowitz could not be reached for comment. Police said the woman who enlisted young girls for Epstein was 20, of Royal Palm Beach. has worked at an Olive

investigation, Edmondson said. Among the others: Alan Dershowitz, the well-known Harvard law professor

R. Crim. P. Rule 17(c). See, e.g., R. Enterprises, 498 U.S. at 299 (Rule 17(c) requires that grand jury subpoenas be reasonable); United States v. Dionisio, 410 U.S. 1, 11 (1973) ("[t]he Fourth Amendment provides protection against a grand jury subpoena duces tecum too sweeping in its terms to be regar

9102 pressure against prosecuting the case. The team of attorneys included Mr. Black and his firm, Jack Goldberger, Gerald Lefcourt, and Professor Alan Dershowitz.' As explained in the Declaration of Epstein knew of the state investigation by the first week of October, 2005. On October 18, 2005, a search war

Goldberger, Gerald Lefcourt, and Professor Alan Dershowitz.' As explained in the Declaration of Epstein kn

Jack Goldberger, Gerald Lefcourt, and Professor Alan Dershowitz.' As explained in the Declaration of

Accordingly, it is a well-recognized principle that courts should not intervene in the grand jury process absent compelling reason. United States v. Dionisio, 410 U.S. 1, 16-18 (1973). A district court also should be mindful of a target's attempts to "saddle a grand jury with mini-trials and preliminary

ding was postponed, however, due to meetings between the State Attorney’s Office and Epstein’s prominent criminal defense lawyer and personal friend, Alan Dershowitz. Appendix at 3; 2 (OPR Report, p. 15; Recarey Depo. 476:12-19). 2. Police Chief Reiter Chastises the State Attorney. 10. Another grand jury was conve

criminal defense lawyer and personal friend, Alan Dershowitz. Appendix at 3; 2 (OPR Report, p. 15; Recarey Dep

cation of grand jury interests is hot ‘some talisman that dissolves all constitutional protections."'Butterworth, 494 U.S. at 630—31 (quoting U.S, v. Dionisio, 410 U.S. 1, 11 (1973)); see also Landmark Communications, Inc. v. Virginia, 435 U.S, 829, 838 (1978) (balancing state’s interest in preserving confi