Epstein Secrets

By signing this agreement, Epstein asserts and certifies that the above has been read and explained to him. Epstein hereby states that he understands the conditions of this Non- Prosec

ts and information referring or relating to the transfer of fund to or from any account owned by NES, LLC to or from any account owned by JEGE, Inc., Jeffrey E. Epstein, Hyperion Air, Inc., Financial Trust Co., New York Strategy Group, Inc., J. Epstein Virgin Islands Foundations, Inc., and/or Epstein Interests. For

ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY Dated: JEFFREY EPSTEIN Dated: GERALD LEFCOURT, ESQ. COUNSEL TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN Dated: F-4Y- 09- ANN Z, ESQ. ATTORNEY FOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN Page 7 of 7 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012597 TAB 22 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012598 08/31/2007 13:03 PAX 5618021787 USAD WEB FL i oo2 U.S. Department of Justice United

, LLC to or from any account owned by JEGE, Inc., Jeffrey E. Epstein, Hyperion Air, Inc., Financial Trust Co.

ase No. 3:04CR00003 (D. Alaska 2004). The federal prosecutors here rejected this idea, and they insisted that an attorney representative, paid for by Mr, Epstein, be appointed. Yet, there was ho suggestion at the time that the attomey representative’s duties included litigating claims on behalf of the identifi

nancial Trust Co., New York Strategy Group, Inc., J. Epstein Virgin Islands Foundations, Inc., and/or Epstein

, LLC to or from any account owned by JEGE, Inc., Jeffrey E. Epstein, Hyperion Air, Inc., Financial Trust Co.,

omas and Palm Beach, FL. The allegations herein concern Epstein’s conduct while at his lavish estate in Palm Beach. 10. Upon information and belief, Epstem has a sexual preference and obsession for underage minor girls. He engaged in a plan and scheme in which he gained access to primarily economically d

ible plea negotiations is dramatically changed upon the return of an indictment. Once an indictment is returned, the Office does not intend to file a Superseding Information containing a lesser charge or to dismiss the case in favor of state prosecution. Please let us know your client’s decision by no later than August 1

w best to use the broad discretion you enjoy in choosing whether to prosecute. In this regard, we suggest that having a greater understanding of who Jeffrey Epstein is as a person may help inform how best to proceed. Jeffrey Epstein was raised in a middle class neighborhood in Brooklyn, New York, by hardworking

ourl Subject: Jeffrey Epstein Illt hope you had a great holiday season. Gerald Lefcourt and I would like to speak with you early next week on the Epstein matter. if you provide me with some convenient dates and times for us to call you, I will coordinate with Gerry and confirm same. regards Lilly A

_CE08_00079 EFTA00184637 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361-46 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 5 of 24 LAW DAVICCII or ALD B. LEFCOURT. PC. Jeffrey Matthew Esq. Andrew Laurie. Esq. Esq. The United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida July 6, 2007 Page 4 The bulk impor

igned to address a specific a problem with which Mr. Epstein's case has nothing in common. If stretched to re

. Declining To Prosecute as an Exercise of Discretion Epstein is being prosecuted by state authorities in Florida. Even if we assume aiguendo that Epslein's conduct constitutes a federal crime that can be proven, nevertheless no "substantial Federal interest" would be served by prosecuting him. On this

le plea negotiations is dramatically changed up6n the return of an indictmeht. Once an indictment is returned, the Office does not intend to file a Superseding Information containing a lesser charge or to dismiss the case in favor of state prosecution. 08-80736-CV-MARRA RFP WPB 001479 EFTA00184665 Case 9:08-cv-807

For A Millionaire Sex Abuser,” Huffington Post, Nov. 29, 2018; Julie K. Brown, et al., “Lawmakers issue call for investigation of serial sex abuser Jeffrey Epstein’s plea deal,” Miami Herald, Dec. 6, 2018. 5 Doe v. United States, 359 F. Supp. 3d 1201 (S.D. Fla., Feb. 21, 2019) (Opinion and Order, 9:08-80736-CIV

n by negotiating and executing a federal non-prosecution agreement (NPA). The NPA was intended to end a federal investigation into allegations that Epstein engaged in illegal sexual activity with girls.1 OPR also investigated whether USAO prosecutors committed professional misconduct by failing to con

e Parties Continue to Negotiate Issues concerning the Attorney Representative and Finally Reach Agreement on the NPA Addendum ................91 D. Epstein Further Delays His Guilty Plea .................................................................94 E. Epstein Seeks Departmental Review of the NP

Its 2006–2008 Federal Criminal Investigation of Jeffrey Epstein and Its Interactions with Victims during

me when you were first authorized to investigate Mr. Epstein that the office had concerns about taking this c

e plea negotiations is drnmatically changed upon the return of an indictment. Once an indictment is returned, the Office does ttot intend to file a Superseding Information containing a lesser charge or to dismiss the case in favor of state prosecution. 58 Menchel told OPR that in his view, the two-year sentence esta

undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby asks for permission to file a Supplemental ex parte Declaration in support of its Response to Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Intervene and to Quash Subpoenas and Cross- Motion to Compel. In support thereof, the United States states the following: 1. The Declara

response consists of rambling generalizations about various areas of the law which have little or nothing to do with the issues actually raised by Epstein, and those sections of the response require no reply. In other portions, however, the government has ignored critical facts, mischaracterized or mis

target surfaces. In re Grand Jury Proceedings in Matter of Freeman, 708 F.2d 1571, 1574-75 (1 1 th Cir. 1983) (citing In re Grand Jury Proceedings (Jeffrey Fine), 641 F.2d 199, 201-03 (5th Cir. 1981)). See also In re Grand Jury Subpoena, 274 F.3d 563, 570 (1st Cir. 2001) ("Colorable claims of attorney-clien

AN & STUMPF, P.A., hereby appears as counsel for Jeffrey Epstein in the above-entitled cause. DATED at Mi

nce of a two-year term of state imprisonment for Mr. Epstein. That offer was not meant as a starting point for

le plea negotiations is dramatically changed upon the return of an indictment. Once an indictment is returned, the Office does not intend to file a Superseding Information containing a lesser charge or to dismiss the case in favor of state prosecution. EFTA00179083 LILLY ANN SANCHEZ, ESQ. AUGUST 3, 2007 PAGE 2 Pl

lorida UNITED STATES ATTORNEY VIA FACSIMILE Lilly Ann Sanchez, Esq. Fowler White Burnett 1395 Brickell Ave Fl 14 Miami Florida 33131-3300 Re: Jeffrey Epstein 99 N.E. 4 Street Miami. FL 33132 (305)9614100 • Telephone (305)5304444 - Facsimile August 3, 2007 Dear Lilly: Thank you for your letter of Aug

ephone (305)5304444 - Facsimile August 3, 2007 Dear Lilly: Thank you for your letter of August 2n6 regarding your proposal on how to resolve the Epstein matter. As we explained at our meeting on July 31, 2007, the Office believes that the federal interest will not be vindicated in the absence of a t

rickell Ave Fl 14 Miami Florida 33131-3300 Re: Jeffrey Epstein 99 N.E. 4 Street Miami. FL 33132 (305)

nce of a two-year term of state imprisonment for Mr. Epstein. That offer was not meant as a starting point for

le plea negotiations is dramatically changed upon the return of an indictment. Once an indictment is returned, the Office does not intend to file a Superseding Information containing a lesser charge or to dismiss the case in favor of state prosecution. EFTA00176604 LILLY ANN SANCHEZ, ESQ. AUGUST 3, 2007 PAGE 2 Pl

Facsimile: (5 August 3, 2007 VIA FACSIMILE Lilly Ann Sanchez, Esq. Fowler White Burnett 1395 Brickell Ave Fl 14 Miami Florida 33131-3300 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Lilly: Thank you for your letter of August 2 nd regarding your proposal on how to resolve the Epstein matter. As we explained at our meeting

Miami Florida 33131-3300 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Lilly: Thank you for your letter of August 2 nd regarding your proposal on how to resolve the Epstein matter. As we explained at our meeting on July 31, 2007, the Office believes that the federal interest will not be vindicated in the absence of a t

Brickell Ave Fl 14 Miami Florida 33131-3300 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Lilly: Thank you for your letter o

t a state prison sentence is not appropriate for Mr. Epstein. Rather we simply stated that if Mr. Epstein pre

le plea negotiations is dramatically changed upon the return of an indictment. Once an indictment is returned, the Office does not intend to file a Superseding Information containing a lesser charge or to dismiss the case in favor of state prosecution. Please let us know your client's decision by no later than . I

ACOSTA UNITED STATES A1TORNEY VIA FACSIMILE( Lilly Ann Sanchez, Esq. Fowler White Burnett 1395 Brickell Ave Fl 14 Miami Florida 33131-3300 Re: Jeffrey Epstein U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida Dear Lilly: Thank you for your letter of August 2' regarding your

ted States Attorney Southern District of Florida Dear Lilly: Thank you for your letter of August 2' regarding your proposal on how to resolve the Epstein matter. As we explained at our meeting on July 31, 2007, the Office believes that the federal interest will not be vindicated in the absence of a t

rickell Ave Fl 14 Miami Florida 33131-3300 Re: Jeffrey Epstein U.S. Department of Justice United State

nce of a two-year term of state imprisonment for Mr. Epstein. That offer was not meant as a starting point for

le plea negotiations is dramatically changed upon the return of an indictment. Once an indictment is returned, the Office does not intend to file a Superseding Information containing a lesser charge or to dismiss the case in favor of state prosecution. Exhibit 41 EFTA00224226 S • • LILLY ANN SANCIII2, ESQ. AUGU

ay. August 03.2007 10;12 AM To: Manche'. Matthew (USAFLS); LOurie. Andrew (USAFLS); Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS) Cc: Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS) Subject: Epstein Letter Hi all —I just noticed one typo in the letter (2nd paragraph, r d to last line — teleephone). With respect to setting the deadline for the r

ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY VIA FACSIMILE Lilly Ann Sanchez, Esq. Fowler Ihite Burnett 1395 Brickell Ave Fl 14 Miami Florida 33131-3300 Re: Jeffrey Epstein 99 N E. 4 Suva Miami. FL 33132 O05)961-9100 - Telephone (305)530-6444 - Facsimile August 3, 2007 Dear Lilly: Thank you for your letter of Augu

y Black Gerald B. Lefcourt R. Alexander Acosta Jeffrey Sloman Andrew Lourie A. Marie Villafalia Since

ime, he is not inclined to meet with counsel for Mr. Epstein. cc: Roy Black Gerald B. Lefcourt R. Alexande

le plea negotiations is dramatically changed upon the return of an indictment. Once an indictment is returned, the Office does not intend to file a Superseding Information containing a lesser charge or to dismiss the case in favor of state prosecution. Exhibit 41 EFTA00226190