Epstein Secrets

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ____________________________________/ Related Cases: 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80993, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-804

d 291 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971). Therefore, it is clear in this intentional tort case that punitive damages are an issue. As this Court knows, Defendant Epstein is alleged to have perpetrated a plan and scheme to sexually molest dozens of underage teenage girls.3 Even assuming that the “compelling need” s

tive damages are an issue. As this Court knows, Defendant Epstein is alleged to have perpetrated a plan and scheme

d that when a plaintiff seeks punitive damages against a defendant, evidence of the defendant’s financial status is both relevant and admissible”); Interstate Narrow Fabrics, Inc. v. Century USA, Inc., 2004 WL 444570 (M.D. N.C. 2004) (holding that tax returns are relevant to the jury’s determination of the amount of punitive

JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ________________________________

admission of the genuineness, the existence, and Epstein’s control of such records, and thus presents a re

ages. It appears from evidence in this case that Defendant Epstein earns and funnels income among a labyrinth of bu

ancial status is both relevant and admissible”); Interstate Narrow Fabrics, Inc. v. Century USA, Inc., 2004 WL 444 570 (M.D. N.C.

JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ________________________________

es are an issue. As this Court knows, Defendant Epstein is alleged to have perpetrated a plan and scheme

tive damages are an issue. As this Court knows, Defendant Epstein is alleged to have perpetrated a plan and scheme

nancial status is both relevant and admissible”); Interstate Narrow Fabrics, Inc. v. Century USA, Inc., 2004 WL 444570 (M.D. N.C.