Epstein Secrets

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ____________________________________/ Related Cases: 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80993, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-804

d 291 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971). Therefore, it is clear in this intentional tort case that punitive damages are an issue. As this Court knows, Defendant Epstein is alleged to have perpetrated a plan and scheme to sexually molest dozens of underage teenage girls.3 Even assuming that the “compelling need” s

tive damages are an issue. As this Court knows, Defendant Epstein is alleged to have perpetrated a plan and scheme

ired conduct with the testimonial privilege. 120 U.S. at 2043, 530 U.S. at 35 (footnotes omitted) (emphasis supplied). Accord United States v. Hammes, 3 F.3d 1081, 1083 (7th Cir. 1993) (“[w]e reject [defendant’s] compulsory self- incrimination claim because the government may use voluntarily filed

JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ________________________________

admission of the genuineness, the existence, and Epstein’s control of such records, and thus presents a re

ages. It appears from evidence in this case that Defendant Epstein earns and funnels income among a labyrinth of bu

d) (emphasis supplied). Accord United States v. Hammes, 3 F.3d 1081, 1083 (7th Cir. 1993) (“[w]e reject

JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ________________________________

es are an issue. As this Court knows, Defendant Epstein is alleged to have perpetrated a plan and scheme

tive damages are an issue. As this Court knows, Defendant Epstein is alleged to have perpetrated a plan and scheme

d) (emphasis supplied). Accord United States v. Hammes, 3 F.3d 1081, 1083 (7th Cir. 1993) (“[w]e reject