Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
y erroneous construction of 18 U.S.C. § 3858(b) — and where rescission "would [have] restore[d] the defendant to the approximate status quo ante"); Craig v. People, 986 P.2d 951, 959-60, 961-93 (Colo. 1999) (holding that plea agreement made no unlawful promises, but concluding that court would not have been req
azzoni Farms, 761 So. 2d at 313 (concluding that "[a] prerequisite to rescission is placing the other party in status quo"); Renfrow v. First Mortg. America, Inc., 2011 WL 2416247, *3 (S.D. Fla. June 13, 2011) (Marra, J.) ("restoring the parties to the status quo ante is an element of a rescission claim"); se
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
y erroneous construction of 18 U.S.C. § 3858(b) — and where rescission "would [have] restore[d] the defendant to the approximate status quo ante"); Craig v. People, 986 P.2d 951, 959-60, 961-93 (Colo. 1999) (holding that plea agreement made no unlawful promises, but concluding that court would not have been req
azzoni Farms, 761 So. 2d at 313 (concluding that "[a] prerequisite to rescission is placing the other party in status quo"); Renfrow v. First Mortg. America, Inc., 2011 WL 2416247, *3 (S.D. Fla. June 13, 2011) (Marra, J.) ("restoring the parties to the status quo ante is an element of a rescission claim"); se
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
y erroneous construction of 18 U.S.C. § 3858(b) — and where rescission "would [have] restore[d] the defendant to the approximate status quo ante"); Craig v. People, 986 P.2d 951, 959-60, 961-93 (Colo. 1999) (holding that plea agreement made no unlawful promises, but concluding that court would not have been req
azzoni Farms, 761 So. 2d at 313 (concluding that "[a] prerequisite to rescission is placing the other party in status quo"); Renfrow v. First Mortg. America, Inc., 2011 WL 2416247, *3 (S.D. Fla. June 13, 2011) (Marra, J.) ("restoring the parties to the status quo ante is an element of a rescission claim"); se
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
y erroneous construction of 18 U.S.C. § 3858(b) — and where rescission "would [have] restore[d] the defendant to the approximate status quo ante"); Craig v. People, 986 P.2d 951, 959-60, 961-93 (Colo. 1999) (holding that plea agreement made no unlawful promises, but concluding that court would not have been req
azzoni Farms, 761 So. 2d at 313 (concluding that "[a] prerequisite to rescission is placing the other party in status quo"); Renfrow v. First Mortg. America, Inc., 2011 WL 2416247, *3 (S.D. Fla. June 13, 2011) (Marra, J.) ("restoring the parties to the status quo ante is an element of a rescission claim"); se
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (167)
Entities connected to both Craig v. People and America, Inc.
Kenneth Marra
PERSON16 w/ Craig·6 w/ America,
WA
Walker
PERSON16 w/ Craig·6 w/ America,
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON16 w/ Craig·6 w/ America,
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON16 w/ Craig·6 w/ America,
GA
Garcia
PERSON15 w/ Craig·6 w/ America,
Marc Rich
PERSON15 w/ Craig·6 w/ America,
Bradley Edwards
PERSON14 w/ Craig·6 w/ America,
United States
LOCATION14 w/ Craig·6 w/ America,
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON14 w/ Craig·6 w/ America,
RU
Rubin
PERSON14 w/ Craig·5 w/ America,
the Southern District
LOCATION13 w/ Craig·5 w/ America,
Paul Cassell
PERSON12 w/ Craig·6 w/ America,
MF
Maria Farmer
PERSON12 w/ Craig·5 w/ America,
George W. Bush
PERSON11 w/ Craig·6 w/ America,
FISTOS & LEHRMAN
ORGANIZATION11 w/ Craig·4 w/ America,
S.J. Quinney College of Law
ORGANIZATION11 w/ Craig·4 w/ America,
Fifth Circuit
ORGANIZATION7 w/ Craig·5 w/ America,
Moussaoui
PERSON6 w/ Craig·6 w/ America,
SA
Santobello
PERSON6 w/ Craig·6 w/ America,
BA
Baird
PERSON5 w/ Craig·6 w/ America,