37 Jane Doe No. 2 v. Epstein Page 32 parties are implicated. See specified requests. As noted by the United States Supreme Court in Eisenstadt v. Baird, 405 U.S. 438,454, 92 S.Ct. 1029, 1038, at fn. 10 (1972): In Stanley, 394 U.S., at 564, 89 S.Ct., at 1247, the Court stated:'(A)lso fundamental is

rights to assert their constitutional right of privacy as guaranteed under the United States and Florida Constitutions. See generally Eisenstadt v. Baird, supra at 454-455 (The right encompasses privacy in one's sexual matters and is not limited to the marital relationship.). Ill. Conclusion Under

in the exception of §39.204. D. Third Party Privacy Rights Are Not a Basis to Deny Discovery The right to privacy discussed in Eisenstadt v. Baird, 405 U.S. 438, 454 (1972), has nothing to do with the discovery issues in this case. Eisenstadt concerns the distribution of a contraceptive devic

aiure See Party Bled. Data Crean 30.1Pany Barg. Oat Conan. AulOPOD 3ed Party Bldg. Data Conan. Sandia* 30.IPT40 0.1m3.fteordecri Colon 310 Party Baird. Apporanem DaIvory.AuloP00 BF Reagent BO FOxpent.0.xoe00 Be Receient Dumdum BO FOxpent. Evened BF Receient Evened. At4oF00 BO FOxpent. Evened.

the United States Supreme Court in Eisenstadt v. Baird, 405 U.S. 438,454, 92 S.Ct. 1029, 1038, at fn. 10

thers third-party privacy rights in that certain names may be mentioned in correspondence, including those on the "list." As noted in Eisenstadt v. Baird, 405 U.S. 438,454, 92 S.Ct. 1029, 1038, at fn. 10 (1972): In Stanley, 394 U.S., at 564, 89 S.Ct., at 1247, the Court stated:'(A)lso fundamental is

thers third-party privacy rights in that certain names may be mentioned in correspondence, including those on the "list." As noted in Eisenstadt v. Baird, 405 U.S. 438,454, 92 S.Ct. 1029, 1038, at fn. 10 (1972): In Stanley, 394 U.S., at 564, 89 S.Ct., at 1247, the Court stated:'(A)lso fundamental is

o be determined), compare Lawrence, 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472 (making it unconstitutional to criminalize homosexual relations) with Eisenstadt v. Baird, 405 U.S. 438, 92 S.Ct. 1029, 31 L.Ed.2d 349 (1972) (holding unconstitutional Massachusetts statute permitting married persons to obtain contracept

n this case?) (We'll also consult with OIA to see if there are any options on the USAO side.) I've attached (yet another) report from former-Warden Baird that was submitted recently and re- attached her previous report and the UK's request for information. If it would be easier to discuss by phone, pl

FirstBankPR000593 EFTA_00124073 EFTA01269277 J. Efain Virgin Islands Foundation, Me. d/b/a Enhanced Education Unanimous Wtitten Consent of the Baird ofTnistees Page 3 IN WITNESS WI-IEREOF. each of the undersigned has executed this Consent for the purpose of giving his consent thereto and approv

.S. Virgin Islands Corporation Cdie Corporation':), hereby certify that the following resolutions were unanimously adopted 'and entered into by the Baird' f Directors on.the irklay of November, 2011: • WITNE8SETH: :WHEREAS, the Corponition is a ‘corport1iun organized and existing under the kiwi of th

ienty Overnight Package Tye.: FedEx Envelope RegKon 4 Pieces 1 Weight 0 Delivered Dec 22.20001125 Sanwa Area Code AA Signed By R.PLATT Baird* ID 000 FedEx Kemal Use- 36221954014:01247,±. Sender LAUREN KWINTNER J EPSTEIN 8 GOING 457 MADISON AVE NEW YORK NY 100224939 US Transportatio

election to affirm. Hendricks I. Stark, 99 Fla. 277, 285, 126 So. 293, 296-97 (Fla. 1930) (internal quotation omitted); see, e.g., United States" Baird, 218 F.3d 221, 230-31 (3d Cir. 2000) (recognizing that "'[u]ntil the party who has the power of avoidance elects to exercise it, the contract remain

election to affirm. Hendricks I. Stark, 99 Fla. 277, 285, 126 So. 293, 296-97 (Fla. 1930) (internal quotation omitted); see, e.g., United States" Baird, 218 F.3d 221, 230-31 (3d Cir. 2000) (recognizing that "'[u]ntil the party who has the power of avoidance elects to exercise it, the contract remain

429 3rd Pany SUN. ECCO 430 31 Party Bury. AuloPOD. COD 431 31 Party SRN. AuloFOD. E.000 432 31 Paly Barg. AulOPOO. 0.gre•cy COO 433 31 Party Baird. AulaF00. &warted, Funds. COO 439 Prepaid. Cdrariteed Find. MOD 440 Roped. Cur:say. ECOD 441 Prepaid. Cuaradeed Funds. E030. Au1oPO0 442 Prep

the United States Supreme Court in Eisenstadt v. Baird, 405 U.S. 438, 454, 92 S.Ct. 1029, 1038, at fn.

00 An lad PartyS.0g ECCO 430 31 Party Bury. AulePOD. COD 431 31 Party surd. AuloFOD. ECOO 432 31 Pany822R ...GPO°. Cw.e•cy COO 433 31 Party Baird. AuloF00. &warted, Fits. COO 439 Prepaid. Crarariteect Ant. (COD 440 Roped. Currency. ECOO 441 Prepaid. Cuaradeed Funds. E030. AelaP00 442 Pr

37 Jane Doe No. 2 v. Epstein Page 32 parties are implicated. See specified requests. As noted by the United States Supreme Court in Eisenstadt v. Baird, 405 U.S. 438, 454, 92 S.Ct. 1029, 1038, at fn. 10 (1972): In Stanley 394 U.S., at 564, 89 S.Ct., at 1247, the Court stated:'(A)Iso fundamental is

thers third-party privacy rights in that certain names may be mentioned in correspondence, including those on the "list." As noted in Eisenstadt v. Baird, 405 U.S. 438, 454, 92 S.Ct. 1029, 1038, at fn. 10 (1972): In Stanley, 394 U.S., at 564, 89 S.Ct., at 1247, the Court stated:'(A)lso fundamental is

Melbourne in or around'**" to be near Darren's family. 26. We lived in Melbourne for 3 years and Darren worked for an engineering company Davies & Baird for approximately 4 months. 27= was born in Melbourne on Following Ms birth we decided to move back to Kadina as we considered a smaller town a

vacy for victims' confidential records). 88 Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113, 152 (1973). 89 Whalen v. Roe, 429 U.S. 589, 599-600 (1977). 9 Eisenstadt v. Baird, 405 U.S. 438, 453 (1972); see also Carey v. Population Servs. Int'l, 431 U.S. 678, 684-85 (1977). DAVID SCHOEN HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017738 --- PAGE BR