331
Total Mentions
316
Documents
6,309
Connected Entities
Surname reference in Epstein documents
Rubin appears in the Epstein files exclusively as a legal case citation (United States v. Rubin, 558 F. Supp. 2d 411) used in documents analyzing crime victims' rights, not as a person connected to Epstein. Two additional mentions reference journalists in automated news emails.
The overwhelming majority of mentions (23 of 25) cite 'United States v. Rubin' in legal documents and court filings related to the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), particularly in arguments about Epstein victims' legal rights during criminal proceedings. The case is cited to discuss whether victim rights apply before criminal charges are filed. Two other mentions reference journalists Alissa J. Rubin (New York Times) and Jennifer Rubin (Washington Post) in automated DOJ/FBI news briefing emails covering unrelated topics like Iraqi kidnappings and Los Angeles corruption.
EFTA00799494_sub_001 - EFTA00799494_100
gestion in the statutory language that victims have a right independent of the government to prosecute a crime [or] set strategy." United States v. Rubin, 558 F. Supp. 2d 411, 417-18 (E.D.N.Y. 2008). "Quite to the contrary, the statute itself provides that `[n]othing in this chapter shall be construed
t `[n]othing in this chapter shall be construed to impair the prosecutorial discretion of the Attorney General or any officer under his direction."' Rubin, 558 F. Supp. 2d at 418 (quoting the CVRA). Simply stated, the CVRA "gives crime victims a voice but not a veto." United States v. Turner, 367 F. S
EFTA00160949
ites in her column in the Washington Post (2/22, Rubin, 14.71M), that 'as of Friday morning, there has been deafening silence from the White House." Rubin adds, "Trump believes he is responsible for none of this (nor of the upturn in hate crimes during his presidency), but it defies logic and experienc
I think it's a very sad thing when a thing like that happens. I've expressed that Jennifer Rubin writes in her column in the Washington Post (2/22, Rubin, 14.71M), that 'as of Friday morning, there has been deafening silence from the White House." Rubin adds, "Trump believes he is responsible for none
EFTA00208513
of Petitioners' Motion for Finding of Violations — does not always provide a remedy, even when a federal criminal case exists. In United States v. Rubin , 558 F. Supp. 2d 411 (E.D.N.Y. 2008), the district court treated the victims with a fair amount of skepticism, and noted that the government believ
ctims with a fair amount of skepticism, and noted that the government believed that the victims were trying to use the CVRA as a mechanism to "undo Rubin's guilty plea in exchange for a favorable settlement of their ongoing civil suit in California state court. Movants take vigorous exception to any [
EFTA00177007_sub_001 - EFTA00177007_100
ictims with a fair amount of skepticism, and noted that the government believed that the victims were trying to use the CVRA as a mechanism to "undo Rubin's guilty plea in exchange for a favorable settlement of their ongoing civil suit in California state court. Movants take vigorous exception to any
that the victims were attempting to use the CVRA to obtain discovery from the defendant. Id. at 416, 425. With respect to certain CVRA rights, the Rubin court noted the lack of a remedy: The CVRA also lists among the rights secured to a victim the right to "be treated with fairness and with respect
EFTA00795170_sub_001 - EFTA00795170_100
gestion in the statutory language that victims have a right independent of the government to prosecute a crime [or] set strategy." United States v. Rubin, 558 F. Supp. 2d 411, 417-18 (E.D.N.Y. 2008). "Quite to the contrary, the statute itself provides that `[n]othing in this chapter shall be construed
t `[n]othing in this chapter shall be construed to impair the prosecutorial discretion of the Attorney General or any officer under his direction."' Rubin, 558 F. Supp. 2d at 418 (quoting the CVRA). Simply stated, the CVRA "gives crime victims a voice but not a veto." United States v. Turner, 367 F. S
EFTA00178057
)(4)." United States v. Okun, 2009 WL 790042 at *2 (E.D.Va. 2009). Still another decision at odds with the Government's position is United States v. Rubin, 2008 WL 2358591 (E.D.N.Y. 2008). This decision is instructive because it not only explains that victims have rights before the formal filing of ch
411 (E.D.N.Y. 2008)— specifically contradicts the Government's position that victims are not entitled to obtain information from the Government. In Rubin, crime victims argued that "the government has not provided information with which to pursue restitution in this ease." Id. at 425. The district co
EFTA00163736
late (12/08, Katzberg), Axios (12/08, Doherty), Fox News (12/08, Price, Spunt), Bloomberg (12/08, Tillman), Deadline (12/08, Johnson), MSNBC (12/08, Rubin), the Daily Beast (12/08, Alfred), the Independent (12/08, O'Connell, Woodward), U.S. News & World Report (12/08, Hubbard), Newsweek (12/08, Dobkin
the Washington Post (12/08, Bella) also reported on the story. Hunter Biden Indictment Alleges Postaddiction Fraud The Wall Street Journal (12/08, Rubin, Linskey, Barber) reported that in early 2020, while his father was on the cusp of a political turnaround that would propel him to the Democratic pr
EFTA00208037
that the victims were attempting to use the CVRA to obtain discovery from the defendant. Id. at 416, 425. With respect to certain CVRA rights, the Rubin court noted the lack of a remedy: The CVRA also lists among the rights secured to a victim the right to "be treated with fairness and with respect
of Petitioners' Motion for Finding of Violations — does not always provide a remedy, even when a federal criminal case exists. In United States v. Rubin, 558 F. Supp. 2d 411 (E.D.N.Y. 2008), the district court treated the victims with a fair amount of skepticism, and noted that the government believ
EFTA00229916_sub_003 - EFTA00229916_277
to provide information supporting whatever claim a victim may wish to assert in a motion for relief under section 3771(d)(3). In United States v. Rubin, 558 F.Supp.2d 411 (ED.N.Y. 2008), an alleged victim of a stock swindle claimed the right to confer in section 3771(aX5) included a right to obtain
ly compromising its ability to be impartial to the government and defendant, the only true parties to the trial of the indictment" United States v. Rubin, 558 F. Supp. 2d 411, 428 (E.D.N.Y. 2008). 4 EFTA00230133 1 .i i r- ate': , Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 58 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2011
EFTA00230494_sub_002 - EFTA00230494_200
s of Petitioners' Motion for Finding of Violations — does not always provide a remedy, even when a federal criminal case exists. In United States'. Rubin, 558 F. Supp. 2d 411 (E.D.N.Y. 2008), the district court treated the victims with a fair amount of skepticism, and noted that the government believ
that the victims were attempting to use the CVRA to obtain discovery from the defendant. Id. at 416, 425. With respect to certain CVRA rights, the Rubin court noted the lack of a remedy: The CVRA also lists among the rights secured to a victim the right to "be treated with fairness and with respect
EFTA00208822_sub_001 - EFTA00208822_100
t `[n]othing in this chapter shall be construed to impair the prosecutorial discretion of the Attorney General or any officer under his direction."' Rubin, 558 F. Supp. 2d at 418 (quoting the CVRA). Simply stated, the CVRA "gives crime victims a voice but not a veto." United States v. Turner, 367 F. S
gestion in the statutory language that victims have a right independent of the government to prosecute a crime [or] set strategy." United States v. Rubin, 558 F. Supp. 2d 411, 417-18 (E.D.N.Y. 2008). "Quite to the contrary, the statute itself provides that `[n]othing in this chapter shall be construed
EFTA00081015_sub_001 - EFTA00081015_100
at In]othing in this chapter shall be construed to impair the prosecutorial discretion of the Attorney General or any officer under his direction."' Rubin, 558 F. Supp. 2d at 418 (quoting the CVRA). Simply stated, the CVRA "gives crime victims a voice but not a veto." United States v. Turner, 367 F. S
gestion in the statutory language that victims have a right independent of the government to prosecute a crime [or] set strategy." United States v. Rubin, 558 F. Supp. 2d 411, 417-18 (E.D.N.Y. 2008). "Quite to the contrary, the statute itself provides that In]othing in this chapter shall be construed
EFTA00229916_sub_002 - EFTA00229916_200
that the victims were attempting to use the CVRA to obtain discovery from the defendant. Id. at 416, 425. With respect to certain CVRA rights, the Rubin court noted the lack of a remedy: The CVRA also lists among the rights secured to a victim the right to "be treated with fairness and with respect
of Petitioners' Motion for Finding of Violations — does not always provide a remedy, even when a federal criminal case exists. In United States v. Rubin, 558 F. Supp. 2d 411 (E.D.N.Y. 2008), the district court treated the victims with a fair amount of skepticism, and noted that the government believ
EFTA00208013
ion of information, because the necessary information had apparently been produced. The Government actions in this case are a far cry from those in Rubin. Rather than providing the victims with material information (or even summaries of that information), the Government has simply stonewalled. The Co
411 (E.D.N.Y. 2008) - specifically contradicts the Government's position that victims are not entitled to obtain information from the Government. In Rubin, crime victims argued that "the government has not provided information with which to pursue restitution in this case." Id. at 425. The district co
EFTA00078835
that the victims were attempting to use the CVRA to obtain discovery from the defendant. Id. at 416, 425. With respect to certain CVRA rights, the Rubin court noted the lack of a remedy: The CVRA also lists among the rights secured to a victim the right to "be treated with fairness and with respect
of Petitioners' Motion for Finding of Violations — does not always provide a remedy, even when a federal criminal case exists. In United States v. Rubin, 558 F. Supp. 2d 411 (E.D.N.Y. 2008), the district court treated the victims with a fair amount of skepticism, and noted that the government believ
EFTA00137295
visits-saudi-arabia-meets- with-crown-prince-and-pompeo-say-local-media/2020/11/23/63f3cab4-2d5f-lleb-9dd6- 2d0179981719_story.html> (11/23, Hendrix, Rubin, Mekhennet, I4.2M) calls it "a watershed visit in the historically hostile relations between the two countries." It also quotes an unnamed "intellig
EFTA00137248
. EFTA00137253 ABC News <https://abcnews.go.coin/Politics/dominion-employees-latest-face-threats-harassment-wake- trump/story?id=74288442> (11/19, Rubin, Bruggeman, Mosk, 2.97M) reports that Dominion Voting Machines' "employees have been the subject of threats and online harassment" following "two we
EFTA00072751
NITE balance sheet was complete fraud. NITE also committed securities fraud in pledging those 4000 worthless securities as collateral to JPM: SCOTUS Rubin: pledging collateral to secure financing is an offer to sell. JPM looked the other way. As did the SEC. Further, I submitted my amended TCR with Be
EFTA00137401
Corruption Probe. The Los Angeles Times <https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-11-30/los-angeles-city-hall-corruption- raymond-chan> (11/30, Rubin, 4.64M) reports, "A former senior aide to Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti has been charged with racketeering conspiracy, bribery and other crimes in
EFTA00135998
hdad's busiest thoroughfares," the New York Times <https://vvww.nytimes.com/2020/07/21/world/middleeast/german-arts-kidnap-baghdad-iraq.html> (7/21, Rubin, Hassan, 18.61M) reports. Mewis "was a well-known figure in the neighborhood, home to the Beit Tarkib Arts Center, which she had established with I

Jeffrey Epstein
PersonAmerican sex offender and financier (1953–2019)

Donald Trump
PersonPresident of the United States (2017–2021, 2025–present)

Prince Andrew
PersonThird child of Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh (born 1960)
Leon Black
PersonAmerican billionaire businessman (born 1951)

Marc Rich
PersonAmerican commodities trader (1934–2013)

Colorado
LocationState of the United States of America

Michael Cohen
PersonAmerican former attorney and former Republican official

William Barr
Person77th & 85th United States Attorney General (born 1950)
Martin Weinberg
PersonAmerican attorney (born 1946)

Alexander Acosta
PersonAmerican attorney and politician, 27th U.S. Secretary of Labor (born 1969)

Denver
LocationConsolidated city-county and capital of Colorado, United States

Jared Kushner
PersonAmerican businessman and real estate investor (born 1981)

Steve Bannon
PersonAmerican media executive & political strategist (born 1953)

Steven Mnuchin
PersonUnited States Secretary of the Treasury from 2017 to 2021

Tony Blair
PersonPrime Minister of the United Kingdom from 1997 to 2007
Berger
PersonSurname reference to multiple individuals: Bill Berger (victims attorney), Yvonne Berger (Brad Wechsler associate), and references in SEC whistleblower complaints

J. Robert Oppenheimer
PersonAmerican theoretical physicist, scientific director of the Manhattan Project (1904-1967)

Bernie Madoff
PersonBernie Madoff, American financier convicted of the largest Ponzi scheme in history, frequently referenced alongside Epstein in documents

Mullen
PersonSurname reference in Epstein documents

Credit Suisse
OrganizationSwiss multinational banking institution