information to both bring complaints and protect/obstruct complaints. Again, you, McKessy, Hoecker have been in possession of my 2013 TCR filed with Berger for several years. In addition to hundreds of e mails continuing into 2020 showing irrefutable and overwhelming evidence to support my allegations.

IRS TCR was based on the SEC TCR. It was WHY IRS CI agents Vikas Arora and Nate Sarnacki flew to Denver from Chicago in April 2016 to meet with me. Berger submitted my IRS TCR shortly after submitting my SEC TCR in March 2013. As you can clearly see and as the record of extensive correspondence (inclu

n a small towel. Former Circuit Judge Bill Berger, who represents one of the victims, and The Palm Beach Post sought the unsealing of the agreement. Berger refers to it as a "sweetheart deal.” "Why was itso important for the government to make this deal?" Berger asked rhetorically. "We have not yet had

International Department Member of the Board Chairman President and Senior Partner Member of the Global Executive Committee and President of Roland Berger Asia Minister of Finance of Egypt; Chair of the International Monetary and Financial Committee, International Monetary Fund (IMF), Washington DC Se

Horowitz, the class act of the evening, grabbed the right card and calmly announced "Moonlight. No Joke." Platt, Horowitz and their co-producer Fred Berger handed their Oscars to Moonlight director Barry Jenkins, and producers Jeremy Kleiner and Adele Romanski and left the stage as Mahershala Ali, the fi

Hillary has worked overtime to soothe Bibi. “She’s indispensable—the only one trusted on all sides [of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict],” says Sandy Berger, who served as Bill Clinton’s National Security Council adviser. Most conspicuously, Hillary has championed what has come to be known as “civil soci

levision), the people have voted the other way with their feet (and their remotes). The law in action today bears little resemblance to Chief Justice Berger’s “categorical...disapprov[al] of [my] theory that obscene, pornographic films acquire constitutional immunity from state regulation simply because t

dge Bill Berger, also representing victims, called the agreement a "sweetheart deal." “Why was it so important for the government to make this deal?” Berger asked rhetorically. “We have not yet had ari honest explanation by any public official as to why it was made ... and why the victims were sold down t

o important for the government to makethis deal?” Berger asked rhetorically. "We have not yet had an hones

Bill Berger, also representing victims, called the agreement a "sweetheart deal." "Why was it so important for the government to make this deal?'' Berger asked rhetorically. "We have not yet had an honest explanation by any public official as to why it was made ... and why the victims were sold down

2699 South Bayshore Drive, Penthouse, Miami, Florida 33133, and Paul Singerman, Esq., counsel for Herbert Stettin, Esq. as Court Appointed Receiver, Berger Singerman, 2000 South Biscayne Blvd., Suite 1000, Miami, FL 33131. Respectfully submitted, By: s/Robert D. Critton ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., Florid

of the people of the United States, the duty of a federal prosecutor is not simply to seek conviction as at any cost, but, rather, to seek justice. Berger v. United States, 295 U.S. 78, 88 (1935). ("The United States Attorney is the representative not of an ordinary party to a controversy, but of a sov

tor] is in a peculiar and very definite sense the servant of the law, the twofold aim of which is that guilt shall not escape or innocence suffer." Berger v. United States, 295 U.S. 78, 88 (1935). Moreover, "[i]n light of the prosecutor's public responsibilities, broad authority and discretion, the pr

01 --- PAGE BREAK --- Table of Authorities Cases Abdell v. City of New York, No. 05 CIV. 8453 KMK JCF, 2006 WL 2664313 (.=. Sept 14, 2006) 8 Berger v. United States, 295 U.S. 78 (1935) 24 Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) 11 Brown v. Marcel, 929 F.3d 4 (2d Cir. 2019) 19, 20 Chemical B

e of the people of the United States, the duty of a federal prosecutor is not simply to seek conviction as at any cost, but, rather, to seek justice. Berger v. United States, 295 U.S. 78, 88 (1935). (“The United States Attorney is the representative not of an ordinary party to a controversy, but of a sove

aw or factual matters which it believes the court overlooked and that might reasonably be expected to alter the court's decision." United States v. Berger, 188 F. Supp. 2d 307, 328-39 (S.D.N.Y. 2002). But "[t]he standard for granting a motion for reconsideration `is strict.' Fanner v. United States, N