Epstein Secrets

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. / JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA/JOHNSON Plai

ircuit pointed out the wealth of other evidence that could be used to defeat a liability claim that did not rest upon the defendant's testimony. See Lot S , 23 F.3d at 364 ("Thus, Claimant's assertion that only her own testimony could vindicate her is groundless; other participants to the illegal acts

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. / JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA/JOHNSON Plai

ut due to his entry into a contractual agreement with the United States for which the identified victims are third-party beneficiaries. n Second, in Lot S , the Eleventh Circuit pointed out the wealth of evidence other than the defendant's testimony that could be used to defeat a liability claim. See

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. / JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA/JOHNSON Plai

ircuit pointed out the wealth of other evidence that could be used to defeat a liability claim that did not rest upon the defendant's testimony. See Lot S , 23 F.3d at 364 ("Thus, Claimant's assertion that only her own testimony could vindicate her is groundless; other participants to the illegal acts