Epstein Secrets

fforts to comply with the CVRA. (DE 6-8, 12-14.) On July 10, 2008, the Court set the matter for a hearing on July 11, 2008. (DE 5.) At the hearing, Jane Doe #2 was added as a Petitioner. (DE15 at 14.) The Court inquired of Petitioners what remedy they sought, and Petitioners made clear that they wanted t

cess rights of persons under investigation. Petitioners' argument fails to take into account the admonition of Congress in section 3771(d)(6) that Inlothing in this chapter shall be construed to impair the prosecutorial discretion of the Attorney General or any officer under his direction." It is well-s

ls between his lawyers and federal prosecutors during the criminal investigation [DE 50 at 5]. Mr. Epstein also opposes the motion of Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 to use the content of the communications that memorialized ongoingse plea and settlement negotiations as substantive evidence in their quest to inva

hether charges might be filed and proceedings initiated in the future is a matter of prosecutorial discretion, and the [Act] expressly provides that Inlothing in this chapter shall be construed to impair the prosecutorial discretion of the Attorney General or any office under his direction!" Id. at *2 (qu

ls between his lawyers and federal prosecutors during the criminal investigation [DE 50 at 5]. Mr. Epstein also opposes the motion of Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 to use these plea negotiations as substantive evidence in their quest to invalidate the Non- Prosecution Agreement [DE 51], as well as their motion t

hether charges might be filed and proceedings initiated in the future is a matter of prosecutorial discretion, and the [Act] expressly provides that Inlothing in this chapter shall be construed to impair the prosecutorial discretion of the Attorney General or any office under his direction!" Id. at '2 (qu