ederal Bureau of Investigation ("FBI" or "Investigating Agency") since 2017. As such, I am a "federal law enforcement officer within the meaning of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41(a)(2)(C), that is, a government agent engaged in enforcing the criminal laws and duly authorized by the Attorney General to request a s

s regarding the status of an ongoing investigation. In so doing, they are following well-established rules and regulations. As a threshold matter, Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e)(2) bars the disclosure of any "matter occurring before the grand jury" by, among others, attorneys for the government and law enforc

o subpoena under Rule 17(h) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. A. Compliance with the subpoena would be unreasonable or oppressive. Under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 17(c)(2), the Court "may quash or modify the subpoena if compliance would be unreasonable or oppressive." Fed. R. Crim. P. 17(c)(2). The

ederal Bureau of Investigation ("FBI" or "Investigating Agency") since 2017. As such, I am a "federal law enforcement officer within the meaning of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41(a)(2)(C), that is, a government agent engaged in enforcing the criminal laws and duly authorized by the Attorney General to request a s

s proposed contrary language on both of these issues. For the following reasons, the Court adopts the Government's proposed protective order. Under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16(d)(1), "[alt any time the court may, for good cause, deny, restrict, or defer discovery or inspection, or grant other appropriate relie

s proposed contrary language on both of these issues. For the following reasons, the Court adopts the Government's proposed protective order. Under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16(d)(1), "[alt any time the court may, for good cause, deny, restrict, or defer discovery or inspection, or grant other appropriate relie

allegations related to one of the alleged victims from the S I superseding indictment as surplusage. The Court declines to do so at this juncture. Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 7(d) allows a court to strike surplusage from an indictment on a defendant's motion. "Motions to strike surplusage from an indictment will

allegations related to one of the alleged victims from the S I superseding indictment as surplusage. The Court declines to do so at this juncture. Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 7(d) allows a court to strike surplusage from an indictment on a defendant's motion. "Motions to strike surplusage from an indictment will

te order. Finally, the parties are ORDERED to meet and confer on the Government's proposal that the Defendant submit witness statements pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 26.2 at least four weeks in advance of trial. The parties are further ORDERED to submit a joint letter laying out their respective positi

s regarding the status of an ongoing investigation. In so doing, they are following well-established rules and regulations. As a threshold matter, Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e)(2) bars the disclosure of any "matter occurring before the grand jury" by, among others, attorneys for the government and law enforc

s regarding the status of an ongoing investigation. In so doing, they are following well-established rules and regulations. As a threshold matter, Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e)(2) bars the disclosure of any "matter occurring before the grand jury" by, among others, attorneys for the government and law enforc

S v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - ex parte sealed letter < Good evening, Attached for Judge Nathan's consideration please find a letter pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16(d)(1), which the Government respectfully requests be filed ex parte and under seal. Respectfully submitted, Assistant United States A

ederal Bureau of Investigation ("FBI" or "Investigating Agency") since 2017. As such, I am a "federal law enforcement officer within the meaning of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41(a)(2)(C), that is, a government agent engaged in enforcing the criminal laws and duly authorized by the Attorney General to request a s

ederal Bureau of Investigation ("FBI" or "Investigating Agency") since 2017. As such, I am a "federal law enforcement officer within the meaning of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41(a)(2)(C), that is, a government agent engaged in enforcing the criminal laws and duly authorized by the Attorney General to request a s

s proposed contrary language on both of these issues. For the following reasons, the Court adopts the Government's proposed protective order. Under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16(d)(1), "[alt any time the court may, for good cause, deny, restrict, or defer discovery or inspection, or grant other appropriate relie

allegations related to one of the alleged victims from the S I superseding indictment as surplusage. The Court declines to do so at this juncture. Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 7(d) allows a court to strike surplusage from an indictment on a defendant's motion. "Motions to strike surplusage from an indictment will

allegations related to one of the alleged victims from the S I superseding indictment as surplusage. The Court declines to do so at this juncture. Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 7(d) allows a court to strike surplusage from an indictment on a defendant's motion. "Motions to strike surplusage from an indictment will

deral Bureau of Investigation ("FBP" or "Investigating Agency") since 2017. As such, I am a "federal law enforcement officer" within the meaning of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41(a)(2)(C), that is, a government agent engaged in enforcing the criminal laws and duly authorized by the Attorney General to request a s

rsuant to the applicable Touhy regulations, DOJ cannot provide any documents in its possession governed by the grand jury secrecy rules set forth in Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e). See 28 U.S.C. § 16.26(b)(1). Please contact me once you have had a chance to review this letter if you would like to discuss the is

ntities; or a department, agency, or officer of any entity named above; and (B) a signature purporting to be an execution or attestation. Finally, Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 27 permits a party to "prove an official record . . . in the same manner as in a civil action." Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 44(a)(1),