Epstein Secrets

EFTA00186707 U.S. Departme A- Justice U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida Grand Jury Coordinator State Attorney's Office 15th Judicial Circuit of Florida West Palm Beach, Florida Re: Federal Grand Jury Subp

carried out until every available clue has been run down and all witnesses examined in every proper way to find if a crime has been committed.' " Branzburg v. Hayes, 408 U.S. 665, 701, 92 S.Ct. 2646, 2667, 33 L.Ed.2d 626 (1972) (quoting United States v. Stone, 429 F.2d 138, 140 (2d Cir.1970)): In re Grand Jury

ivileges. A grand jury subpoena may not be unreasonable or oppressive, and it may not violate a constitutional, common law or statutory privilege. Branzburg, 408 U.S. at 688, 92 S.Ct. at 2660; Fed.R.Crim.P. 17(c). Grand jury subpoenas are presumed to be reasonable and the party seeking to quash the

to pay such costs (28 USC 1825, Rule 17(b) Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure)" EFTA00186750 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida 500 South Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 DELIVERY BY FACSIMILE Denise Coffman, Esq. Counsel to the Clerk of Cou

ivileges. A grand jury subpoena may not be unreasonable or oppressive, and it may not violate a constitutional, common law or statutory privilege. Branzburg, 408 U.S. at 688, 92 S.Ct. at 2660; Fed.R.Crim.P. 17(c). Grand jury subpoenas are presumed to be reasonable and the party seeking to quash the s

y carried out until every available clue has been run down and all witnesses examined in every proper way to fmd if a crime has been committed.' " Branzburg v. Hayes, 408 U.S. 665, 701, 92 S.Ct. 2646, 2667, 33 L.Ed.2d 626 (1972) (quoting United States v. Stone, 429 P.2d 138, 140 (2d Cir.1970)); In re Grand Jury

5g: al 9l49 5/ if 3,w/a EFTA00277550 UU/U0, ,CUU0 ZU:41 rAA 001OULII01 UbAU Orb ty trJUUZ U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida September 6, 2006 DELIVERY BY FACSIMILE Denise Coffman, Esq. Counsel to the Clerk of Court and Comptroller 15th Judicial Circuit of F

carried out until every available clue has been run down and all witnesses examined in every proper way to find if a crime has been committed.' " Branzburg v. Hayes, 408 U.S. 665, 701, 92 2646, 2667, 33 L.Ed.2d 626 (1972) (quoting United States v. Stone, 429 F.2d 138, 140 (2d Cir.1970)); In re Grand Jury Subpo

ivileges. A grand jury subpoena may not be unreasonable or oppressive, and it may not violate a constitutional, common law or statutory privilege. Branzburg, 408 U.S. at 68S, 92 S.Ct. at 2660; Fed.R.Crim.P. 17(c). Grand jury subpoenas are presumed to be reasonable and the party seeking to quash the

aterial) Descri don: r 9 EFTA01699656 09/06/2006 20:41 FAX 5618021787 USA° WPB FL i3002 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida DELIVERY BY FACSIMILE est alm Beac F on. a Re: Federal Grand Jury Subpoena Dear 500 South Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beac

ly carried out until every available clue has been run down and all witnesses examined in every proper way to find if a crime has been committed.' Branzburg v. Hayes, 408 U.S. 665, 701, 92 S.Q. 2646, 2667, 33 L.Ed.2d 626 (1972) (quoting United Sixes v. •Stone, 429 F.2d 138, 140 (24 Cir.1970)); In re Gr

ivileges. A grand jury subpoena may not be unreasonable or oppressive, and it may not violate a constitutional, common law or statutory privilege. Branzburg, 408 U.S. at 68S, 92 S.Ct. at 2660; Fed.R.Crim.P. 17(c). Grand jury subpoenas are presumed to be reasonable and the party seeking to quash the

U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Silvio J. Mono Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York. New York 10007 February 28, 2019 TO BE FILED UNDER SEAL VIA EMAIL T

such investigations it may compel the production of documentary evidence or the testimony of witnesses, as it deems necessary." Id. at 421-22; see Branzburg v. Hayes, 408 U.S. 665, 688 (1972) ("Although the powers of the grand jury are not unlimited and are subject to the supervision of a judge, the longstanding

ing filed under seal. Assistant U.S. Attorney SERVICE LIST In re Federal Grand Jury Subpoenas No. OLY-63 and OLY-64 United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Assistant U.S. Attorney U.S. Attorney's Office West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Telephone: Facsimile: Attorney for United States EFTA0021

pt for those persons protected by a constitutional, common-law or statutory privilege, . . . is particularly applicable to grand jury proceedings." Branzburg v. Hayes , 408 U.S. 665, 688 (1972) (citations omitted). In R. Enterprises , the Supreme Court held that subpoenas cannot be quashed on the basis o

U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Silvio J. Mollo Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York. New York 10007 February 28, 2019 TO BE FILED UNDER SEAL VIA EMAIL

such investigations it may compel the production of documentary evidence or the testimony of witnesses, as it deems necessary." Id. at 421-22; see Branzburg v. Hayes, 408 U.S. 665, 688 (1972) ("Although the powers of the grand jury are not unlimited and are subject to the supervision of a judge, the longstanding

U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Silvio J. Mediu Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York. New York 10007 February 28, 2019 TO BE FILED UNDER SEAL VIA EMAIL

such investigations it may compel the production of documentary evidence or the testimony of witnesses, as it deems necessary." Id. at 421-22; see Branzburg v. Hayes, 408 U.S. 665, 688 (1972) ("Although the powers of the grand jury are not unlimited and are subject to the supervision of a judge, the longstanding

U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Silvio J. Mediu Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York. New York 10007 February 28, 2019 TO BE FILED UNDER SEAL VIA EMAIL

such investigations it may compel the production of documentary evidence or the testimony of witnesses, as it deems necessary." Id. at 421-22; see Branzburg v. Hayes, 408 U.S. 665, 688 (1972) ("Although the powers of the grand jury are not unlimited and are subject to the supervision of a judge, the longstanding

ida 33131. Phone: -• Fax: • www.RoyBlack.com EFTA00179070 •••gC •• • 4 (Re.. 06"2005)Scaled Document nuking Fonn UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Southern District of Florida Case Number: FGJ 07-103 (WPB) OLY•63 & OLY-64 IN RE GRAND JURY SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM ISSUED TO WILLIAM RILEY Plaintiff Defendant Pa

pt for those persons protected by a constitutional, common-law or statutory privilege, . . . is particularly applicable to grand jury proceedings." Branzburg v. Hayes, 408 U.S. 665, 688 (1972) (citations omitted). In R. Enterprises, the Supreme Court held that subpoenas cannot be quashed on the basis of irrelevan