Epstein Secrets

rney was James Eisenberg, and his fees were paid by Jeffrey Epstein, the target of the investigation. Fs 4. In the summer of 2007, Mr. Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("the Office") entered into negotiations to resolve the investigation. At that time, Mr. Epstein had been char

ttorney Edwards' other client, MI, was represented by counsel and, accordingly, all contact with was made through that attorney. That attorney was James Eisenberg, and his fees were paid by Jeffrey Epstein, the target of the investigation. Fs 4. In the summer of 2007, Mr. Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Offic

livered as each victim was contacted. F3The undersigned does not know when Mr. Edwards began representing or whether ever formally terminated Mr. Eisenberg's representation. EFTA00014149

men who were officially identified by the FBI and the U.S. Attorney’s Office as victims of Epstein, now 65. But after the FBI

aeseeaeeeeseesceateaeeeeas 11 In re Herald Co. v. Weisenberg, 59 N.Y.2d 378, 465 N.Y.S.2d 862 (1983) oo... ee

as represented by James Eisenberg, Esq. Consequently, all contact with was made through Mr. Eisenberg. In mid-2007, Epstein's attorneys approached the U.S. Attorney's Office in an effort to resolve the federal investigation. At that time, Mr. Epstein had been charged by the State of Florida with solicitation of prostitu

ct with Decl., ¶ 4. Earlier in the investigation, a was represented by James Eisenberg, Esq. Consequently, all contact with was made through Mr. Eisenberg. In mid-2007, Epstein's attorneys approached the U.S. Attorney's Office in an effort to resolve the federal investigation. At that time, Mr. Epstei

a manner similar to the way the Court would handle victim impact statements in the context of a criminal sentencing. • All criminal prosecutors in the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAO-SDFL) will undergo additional training on the CVRA, victim rights, and victim assistance issues to be c

p. 2d 1214, 1216 (S.D. Fla. 2011) (citing Sierra Equity Group, Inc. v. White Oak Equity Partners, LLC, 650 F. Supp. 2d 1213, 1231 (S.D. Fla. 2009); Eisenberg v. Standard Ins. Co., No. 09-80199, 2009 WL 1809994, at *3 (S.D. FIa. June 25, 2009)). But that is precisely what Petitioners seek here. Accordingl

et answers about that and other related questions will, Jane Doe 1 and 2 believe, provide the kind of information that they would have received had the U.S. Attorney's Office properly conferred in a timely fashion back in 2007"); id. at 24-25 ("If the Government had properly conferred with the two Jane Does ... [t]hese e