Epstein Secrets

17847, at *1-2 (N.D. Fla. Feb. 10, 2005) (Francis I) (staying federal civil action in favor of "a criminal case currently pending in state court in Bay County, Florida, arising from the same facts and involving the same parties as the Instant action," noting that "the language of 18 U.S.C. § 3509(k) is cl

t with. mai Decl., ¶ 4. Earlier in the investigation. was represented by James Eisenberg, E:sq. Consequently, all contact with. was made through Mr. Eisenberg. In mid-2007, Epstein's attorneys approached the U.S. Attorney's Office in an effort to resolve the federal investigation. al 5. At that time, Mr.

nvestigation, AUSAIIIIII and the FBI's Victim-Witness Specialist had contact with. mai Decl., ¶ 4. Earlier in the investigation. was represented by James Eisenberg, E:sq. Consequently, all contact with. was made through Mr. Eisenberg. In mid-2007, Epstein's attorneys approached the U.S. Attorney's Office in an

17847, at *1-2 (N.D. Fla. Feb. 10, 2005) (Francis I) (staying federal civil action in favor of "a criminal case currently pending in state court in Bay County, Florida, arising from the same facts and involving the same parties as the Instant action," noting that "the language of 18 U.S.C. § 3509(k) is cl

would have had, if Mr. Epstein 'The undersigned does not know when Mr. Edwards began representing T.M. or whether T.M. ever formally terminated Mr. Eisenberg's representation. -3- EFTA00233853 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 33 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/07/2009 Page 24 of 41 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM

y Edwards' other client, T.M., was represented by counsel and, accordingly, all contact with T.M. was made through that attorney. That attorney was James Eisenberg, and his fees were paid by Jeffrey Epstein, the target of the investigation.' 5. In the summer of 2007, Mr. Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office

17847, at *1-2 (N.D. Fla. Feb. 10, 2005) (Francis I) (staying federal civil action in favor of "a criminal case currently pending in state court in Bay County, Florida, arising from the same facts and involving the same parties as the Instant action," noting that "the language of 18 U.S.C. § 3509(k) is cl

would have had, if Mr. Epstein 'The undersigned does not know when Mr. Edwards began representing T.M. or whether T.M. ever formally terminated Mr. Eisenberg's representation. 09112/2019 CONFIDENTIAL Agency to Agency Requet: 19-011 SDNY_GM_00331560 EFTA_00204286 EFTA02729277 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM