Back to Network
3
Shared Docs
1
Same-Page
4 / 3
Mentions
Document Mentions (3 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page EFTA00030252Same page
Cr. 047, 2018 WL 888744, at *9 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 2018) (same); United States v. Anderson, 384 F.Supp.2d 32, 41 (D.D.C. 2005) (same); United States v. Benatar, No. 02 Cr. 099, 2002 WL 31410262, at *3 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 10, 2002) (same). D. Private Security is Inadequate and Raises Numerous Questions and Chall
Page: EFTA00030252 →); United States v. Cohen, No. C 10-00547, 2010 WL 5387757, at *9 n. I I (N.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2010); United States v. Bohn, 330 F. Supp. 2d 960, 961 (W.D. Tenn. 2004); United States v. Stroh, No. 396 Cr. 139, 2000 WL 1832956, at *5 (D. Conn. Nov. 3, 2000); United States v. Botero, 604 F. Supp. 1028, 1035 (S
Page: EFTA00030252 →3 mentions
Page EFTA00015538
13); United States v. Cohen, No. C 10-00547, 2010 WL 5387757, at *9 n.11 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2010); United States v. Bohn, 330 F. Supp. 2d 960, 961 (W.D. Tenn. 2004); United States v. Stroh, No. 396 Cr. 139, 2000 WL 1832956, at *5 (D. Conn. Nov. 3, 2000); United States v. Botero, 604 F. Supp. 1028, 1035 (S
Page: EFTA00015538 →Page EFTA00015539
Cr. 047, 2018 WL 888744, at *9 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 2018) (same); United States v. Anderson, 384 F. Supp.2d 32, 41 (D.D.C. 2005) (same); United States v. Benatar, No. 02 Cr. 099, 2002 WL 31410262, at *3 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 10, 2002) (same). 5. Private Security is Inadequate, Unfair, and Impractical Here The defe
Page: EFTA00015539 →Page EFTA00015553
Cr. 047, 2018 WL 888744, at *9 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 2018) (same); United States v. Anderson, 384 F.Supp.2d 32, 41 (D.D.C. 2005) (same); United States v. Benatar, No. 02 Cr. 099, 2002 WL 31410262, at *3 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 10, 2002) (same). Finally, there can be little doubt that the defendant is in a position to
Page: EFTA00015553 →2 mentions
Page EFTA00028791
13); United States v. Cohen, No. C 10-00547, 2010 WL 5387757, at *9 n.11 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2010); United States v. Bohn, 330 F. Supp. 2d 960, 961 (W.D. Tenn. 2004); United States v. Stroh, No. 396 Cr. 139, 2000 WL 1832956, at *5 (D. Conn. Nov. 3, 2000); United States v. Botero, 604 F. Supp. 1028, 1035 (S
Page: EFTA00028791 →Page EFTA00028792
Cr. 047, 2018 WL 888744, at *9 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 2018) (same); United States v. Anderson, 384 F. Supp.2d 32, 41 (D.D.C. 2005) (same); United States v. Benatar, No. 02 Cr. 099, 2002 WL 31410262, at *3 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 10, 2002) (same). 5. Private Security is Inadequate, Unfair, and Impractical Here The defe
Page: EFTA00028792 →Sponsored
Mutual Connections (68)
Entities connected to both Benatar and W.D. Tenn.
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON9 w/ Benatar·3 w/ W.D.
Michael Jackson
PERSON9 w/ Benatar·3 w/ W.D.
Anderson
PERSON8 w/ Benatar·3 w/ W.D.
ZA
Zarger
PERSON8 w/ Benatar·3 w/ W.D.
CA
Casteneda
PERSON8 w/ Benatar·3 w/ W.D.
District Court for the Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION8 w/ Benatar·3 w/ W.D.
Second Circuit
ORGANIZATION8 w/ Benatar·3 w/ W.D.
MW
Martin Weinberg
PERSON8 w/ Benatar·3 w/ W.D.
Harry Reid
PERSON7 w/ Benatar·3 w/ W.D.
Reid Weingarten
PERSON7 w/ Benatar·3 w/ W.D.
PI
Pitman
PERSON7 w/ Benatar·3 w/ W.D.
Richard M. Berman
PERSON7 w/ Benatar·3 w/ W.D.
GL
Gleeson
PERSON7 w/ Benatar·2 w/ W.D.
New York State
LOCATION7 w/ Benatar·2 w/ W.D.
N.Y. Post
ORGANIZATION6 w/ Benatar·2 w/ W.D.
Prince Andrew
PERSON6 w/ Benatar·2 w/ W.D.
U.S. Virgin Islands
LOCATION6 w/ Benatar·2 w/ W.D.
United States
LOCATION5 w/ Benatar·3 w/ W.D.
Icarus
PERSON6 w/ Benatar·2 w/ W.D.
AN
Annabi
PERSON6 w/ Benatar·2 w/ W.D.