Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
e.g., United States v. Israel, 05 Cr. 1039 (CM), Dkt. No. 25; United States v. Cromitie, et at, 09 Cr. 558 (CM), Dkt. No. 183, 200; United States v. Annabi, 10 Cr. 07 (CM), Dkt. No. 45; United States v. Arici, 12 Cr. 24 (LAP), Dkt. No. 115, 117; United States v. Reeves, et at, 16 Cr. 372 (VEC), Dkt. No
sfy the second prong of the Duren test. 46 F.3d 1240 (2d Cir. 1995). The unique facts of Jackman make it readily distinguishable. The jury clerk in Jaclanan relied on a qualified jury wheel that was mostly drawn from a master jury wheel that completely excluded potential jurors from two cities in the Di
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
e.g., United States v. Israel, 05 Cr. 1039 (CM), Dkt. No. 25; United States v. Cromitie, et at, 09 Cr. 558 (CM), Dkt. No. 183, 200; United States v. Annabi, 10 Cr. 07 (CM), Dkt. No. 45; United States v. Arici, 12 Cr. 24 (LAP), Dkt. No. 115, 117; United States v. Reeves, et at, 16 Cr. 372 (VEC), Dkt. No
sfy the second prong of the Duren test. 46 F.3d 1240 (2d Cir. 1995). The unique facts of Jackman make it readily distinguishable. The jury clerk in Jaclanan relied on a qualified jury wheel that was mostly drawn from a master jury wheel that completely excluded potential jurors from two cities in the Di
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
e.g., United States v. Israel, 05 Cr. 1039 (CM), Dkt. No. 25; United States v. Cromitie, et at, 09 Cr. 558 (CM), Dkt. No. 183, 200; United States v. Annabi, 10 Cr. 07 (CM), Dkt. No. 45; United States v. Arici, 12 Cr. 24 (LAP), Dkt. No. 115, 117; United States v. Reeves, et al., 16 Cr. 372 (VEC), Dkt. N
sfy the second prong of the Duren test. 46 F.3d 1240 (2d Cir. 1995). The unique facts of Jackman make it readily distinguishable. The jury clerk in Jaclanan relied on a qualified jury wheel that was mostly drawn from a master jury wheel that completely excluded potential jurors from two cities in the Di
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
.g., United States v. Israel, 05 Cr. 1039 (CM), Dkt. No. 25; United States v. Crornitie, et at, 09 Cr. 558 (CM), Dkt. No. 183, 200; United States v. Annabi, 10 Cr. 07 (CM), Dkt. No. 45; United States v. Arici, 12 Cr. 24 (LAP), Dkt. No. 115, 117; United States v. Reeves, et at, 16 Cr. 372 (VEC), Dkt. No
sfy the second prong of the Duren test. 46 F.3d 1240 (2d Cir. 1995). The unique facts of Jackman make it readily distinguishable. The jury clerk in Jaclanan relied on a qualified jury wheel that was mostly drawn from a master jury wheel that completely excluded potential jurors from two cities in the Di
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (119)
Entities connected to both Annabi and Jaclanan
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON59 w/ Annabi·4 w/ Jaclanan
United States
LOCATION55 w/ Annabi·4 w/ Jaclanan
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION45 w/ Annabi·4 w/ Jaclanan
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON43 w/ Annabi·4 w/ Jaclanan
ET
Emmy Taylor
PERSON37 w/ Annabi·4 w/ Jaclanan
Second Circuit
ORGANIZATION31 w/ Annabi·4 w/ Jaclanan
New York State
LOCATION31 w/ Annabi·4 w/ Jaclanan
BO
Bortnovsky
PERSON26 w/ Annabi·4 w/ Jaclanan
RU
Russo
PERSON26 w/ Annabi·4 w/ Jaclanan
CO
Collins
PERSON25 w/ Annabi·4 w/ Jaclanan
Giglio
PERSON25 w/ Annabi·4 w/ Jaclanan
TH
Thompson
PERSON24 w/ Annabi·4 w/ Jaclanan
TR
Tracy
PERSON24 w/ Annabi·4 w/ Jaclanan
WA
Walker
PERSON24 w/ Annabi·4 w/ Jaclanan
Brady
PERSON22 w/ Annabi·4 w/ Jaclanan
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON22 w/ Annabi·4 w/ Jaclanan
CO
Coppa
PERSON20 w/ Annabi·4 w/ Jaclanan
the White Plains Division
ORGANIZATION19 w/ Annabi·4 w/ Jaclanan
Rivera
PERSON12 w/ Annabi·4 w/ Jaclanan
PE
Perez
PERSON12 w/ Annabi·4 w/ Jaclanan