Epstein Secrets

ion endures, the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe and others earned an order to shut down the Dakota Access Pipeline, and a Washington tribe beat BNSF in a Ninth Circuit oil shipping dispute. Here's a look at some of the highest-profile decisions in Native American law from the first half of 2020. [Continue Reading]

guments from 15 attorneys filed in April by two groups of policyholder plaintiffs, one seeking to centralize federal business interruption cases in the Northern District of Illinois in Chicago and the other asking for them to be centralized in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia. [Continue Reading]

ward Raymond EGE, Joseph Boyd and Joseph Victor luio, Appellants, UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. No. 14955. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit April 1, 1957. Rehearing Denied May 15, 1957. One defendant was convicted of transporting woman front California to Arizona for purposes of pros

cs laws and of the circumstantial elements in the rec- conspiracy. The United States District ord in this case is sufficient to support Court for the Northern District of Call- the conviction of the defendant Cousins fognia, Southern Division, Michael J. on the conspiracy count; and since a per- Roche, J., render

Robert W. Ware, United States Marshal for the Southern District of California, Appel. ken. Mime. Nos. 895, 596. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. Nov. 5, 1958. Accused, who had been indicted in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan for alleged- t mailing cir

f while in custody of city police and for alleged ille- gal transportation of his person into an- other state. The United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Kloeb, J., rendered judgment dismissing complaint with prejudice, and plaintiff appealed. The Court of Appeals, held that order dismissi

y Op. Serv. 11,330, 2007 Daily Journal D.A.R. 14,672 (Cite as: 504 F.3d 737) H U.S. Sinerius C.A.9 (Mont.),2007. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arthur Emil SINERIUS, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. No. 06-30327. Argued and Submitted March 9, 20

)(4XB); Fed.Rules Cr.Proc.Rule 32(cX1), 18 U.S.C.A.; U.S.S.G. § 2G2.2(bX3), 18 U.S.C.A. •373 On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. Before GUY and DAUGHTREY, Circuit Judges; and LAWSON, District Judge.' FN' The Honorable David M. Lawson, United States District Judge f

peaching statements that would have been subject to disclosure if the investigator had testified about them. **2166 The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit while acknowledging that the trial court's ruling constituted a `very lim- ited and seemingly judicious restriction,' 501 F.2d, at 151, nevertheles

ents and violations, In Re Air Crash Near Cali, Colombia, 959 F. Supp. 1529 (S.D. Fla. 1997); the decision of Judge Vinson, now the Chief Judge in the Northern District of Florida, denying discovery and recognizing a privilege for a corporation that reports contamination and other environmental hazards and violatio