Epstein Secrets

njoin the stay. And we conclude that this provision does not violate separation of powers principles.") (emphasis added). One District Court within the Eleventh Circuit recently construed "the plain language of § 3509(k)" as "regaining" a stay in a case . . . where . . a parallel criminal action [is] pending." Doe

In October 2007, shortly after the agreement was signed, four victims were contacted and these provisions were discussed. One of those victims was C.W. who at the time was not represented, and she was given notice of the agreement. Notice was also provided of an expected change of plea in October 2

ss Specialist. Attached hereto are copies of the letters provided to Bradley Edwards' three clients, T.M., C.W., and S.R.' Your Affiant's letter to C.W. was provided by the FBI. (Ex. 11. Your Affiant's letter to T.M. was hand-delivered by myself to T.M. at the time that she was interviewed (Ex. 2).2

njoin the stay. And we conclude that this provision does not violate separation of powers principles.") (emphasis added). One District Court within the Eleventh Circuit recently construed "the plain language of § 3509(k)" as "requirfing/ a stay in a case . . . where . . . a parallel criminal action [is] pending." D

ss Specialist. Attached hereto are copies of the letters provided to Bradley Edwards' three clients, T.M., C.W., and S.R.' Your Affiant's letter to C.W. was provided by the FBI. (Ex. 1). Your Affiant's letter to T.M. was hand-delivered by myself to T.M. at the time that she was interviewed (Ex. 2).2

. on May 30, 2008 (Ex. 5). 4. Throughout the investigation, the FBI agents, the FBI's Victim-Witness Specialist, and your A Mani had contact with C.W. and S.R. Attorney Edwards' other client, T.M., was represented by counsel and, accordingly, all contact with T.M. was made through that attorney. T

at 24-25. The Court further discussed a need to "hav[e] a complete record, and EFTA00206708 this is going to be an issue that's ... going to go to the Eleventh Circuit, [s] it] may be better to have acomplete record as to what your position is and the government's is as to what actions were taken. And I don't know

f Epstein's attorneys (and apparently acceded to by the U.S. Attorney's Office). Second, Ms. had EFTA00206710 said that "four victims [including C.W. — i.e., Jane Doe #1] were contacted and these provisions were discussed," it was not clear what provisions had in fact been discussed. 46. On Decem

at 24-25. The Court further discussed a need to "hav[e] a complete record, and EFTA00206745 this is going to be an issue that's ... going to go to the Eleventh Circuit, [s] it] may be better to have acomplete record as to what your position is and the government's is as to what actions were taken. And I don't know

f Epstein's attorneys (and apparently acceded to by the U.S. Attorney's Office). Second, Ms. had EFTA00206747 said that "four victims [including C.W. — i.e., Jane Doe #1] were contacted and these provisions were discussed," it was not clear what provisions had in fact been discussed. 46. On Decem

njoin the stay. And we conclude that this provision does not violate separation of powers principles.") (emphasis added). One District Court within the Eleventh Circuit recently construed "the plain language of § 3509(k)" as "requirlind a stay in a case . . . where . . . a parallel criminal action [is] pending." Do

on May 30, 2008 (Ex. 5). 4. Throughout the investigation, the FBI agents, the FBI's Victim-Witness Specialist, and your A (tient had contact with C.W. and II Attorney Edwards' other client, was represented by counsel and, accordingly, all contact with MB was made through that attorney. That attor

etition, held on July 11, 2008. The Court discussed a need to "hav[e] a complete record, and this is going to be an issue that's ... going to go to the Eleventh Circuit, (so it] may be better to have a complete record as to what your position is and the government's is as to what actions were taken." Tr. at 25-26. C

r victims [including C.W.J were contacted and these provisions were discussed' (emphasis added). Similarly at page 5, the declaration states: "After C.W. had been notified of the terms of the agreement " (emphasis added). I write to inquire whether, in view of the fact that the provision noted above

etition, held on July 11, 2008. The Court discussed a need to "hav[e] a complete record, and this is going to be an issue that's ... going to go to the Eleventh Circuit, (so it] may be better to have a complete record as to what your position is and the government's is as to what actions were taken." Tr. at 25-26. C

r victims [including C.W.] were contacted and these provisions were discussed' (emphasis added). Similarly at page 5, the declaration states: "After C.W. had been notified of the terms of the agreement " (emphasis added). I write to inquire whether, in view of the fact that the provision noted above