Back to Network
8
Shared Docs
8
Same-Page
8 / 8
Mentions
Document Mentions (8 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
s.") (emphasis added). One district court within the Eleventh Circuit, facing the identical issue with a pending state
riminal case currently pending in state court in Bay County, Florida, arising from the same facts and involv
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
njoin the stay. And we conclude that this provision does not violate separation of powers principles.") (emphasis added). One district court within the Eleventh Circuit, facing the identical issue with a pending state prosecution, recently construed "the plain language of § 3509(k)" as "requirfing] a stay in a case
17847, at *1-2 (N.D. Fla. Feb. 10, 2005) (Francis I) (staying federal civil action in favor of "a criminal case currently pending in state court in Bay County, Florida, arising from the same facts and involving the same parties as the Instant action," noting that "the language of 18 3 EFTA00221643 Case
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
njoin the stay. And we conclude that this provision does not violate separation of powers principles.") (emphasis added). One district court within the Eleventh Circuit, facing the identical issue with a pending state prosecution, recently construed "the plain language of § 3509(k)" as "requirfing] a stay in a case
17847, at *1-2 (N.D. Fla. Feb. 10, 2005) (Francis I) (staying federal civil action in favor of "a criminal case currently pending in state court in Bay County, Florida, arising from the same facts and involving the same parties as the Instant action," noting that "the language of 18 3 EFTA00222644 Case
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
njoin the stay. And we conclude that this provision does not violate separation of powers principles.") (emphasis added). One district court within the Eleventh Circuit, facing the identical issue with a pending state prosecution, recently construed "the plain language of § 3509(k)" as "requirfing] a stay in a case
17847, at *1-2 (N.D. Fla. Feb. 10, 2005) (Francis I) (staying federal civil action in favor of "a criminal case currently pending in state court in Bay County, Florida, arising from the same facts and involving the same parties as the Instant action," noting that "the language of 18 3 EFTA00222678 Case
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
njoin the stay. And we conclude that this provision does not violate separation of powers principles.") (emphasis added). One District Court within the Eleventh Circuit recently construed "the plain language of § 3509(k)" as "regaining" a stay in a case . . . where . . a parallel criminal action [is] pending." Doe
17847, at *1-2 (N.D. Fla. Feb. 10, 2005) (Francis I) (staying federal civil action in favor of "a criminal case currently pending in state court in Bay County, Florida, arising from the same facts and involving the same parties as the Instant action," noting that "the language of 18 U.S.C. § 3509(k) is cl
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
njoin the stay. And we conclude that this provision does not violate separation of powers principles.") (emphasis added). One District Court within the Eleventh Circuit recently construed "the plain language of § 3509(k)" as "requirlind a stay in a case . . . where . . . a parallel criminal action [is] pending." Do
17847, at *1-2 (N.D. Fla. Feb. 10, 2005) (Francis I) (staying federal civil action in favor of "a criminal case currently pending in state court in Bay County, Florida, arising from the same facts and involving the same parties as the Instant action," noting that "the language of 18 U.S.C. § 3509(k) is cl
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
njoin the stay. And we conclude that this provision does not violate separation of powers principles.") (emphasis added). One district court within the Eleventh Circuit, facing the identical issue with a pending state prosecution, recently construed "the plain language of § 3509(k)" as "requirtingl a stay in a case
7847, at *1-2 (N.D. Fla. Feb. 10, 2005) (Francis .1) (staying federal civil action in favor of "a criminal case currently pending in state court in Bay County, Florida, arising from the same facts and involving the same parties as the Instant action," noting that "the language of 18 3 EFTA00175707 Case
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
njoin the stay. And we conclude that this provision does not violate separation of powers principles.") (emphasis added). One District Court within the Eleventh Circuit recently construed "the plain language of § 3509(k)" as "requirfing/ a stay in a case . . . where . . . a parallel criminal action [is] pending." D
17847, at *1-2 (N.D. Fla. Feb. 10, 2005) (Francis I) (staying federal civil action in favor of "a criminal case currently pending in state court in Bay County, Florida, arising from the same facts and involving the same parties as the Instant action," noting that "the language of 18 U.S.C. § 3509(k) is cl
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (239)
Entities connected to both the Eleventh Circuit and Bay County
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON210 w/ the·13 w/ Bay
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON178 w/ the·8 w/ Bay
Kenneth Marra
PERSON148 w/ the·7 w/ Bay
United States
LOCATION124 w/ the·5 w/ Bay
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON110 w/ the·9 w/ Bay
Bradley Edwards
PERSON104 w/ the·3 w/ Bay
the Southern District
LOCATION88 w/ the·7 w/ Bay
JG
Jack Goldberger
PERSON80 w/ the·12 w/ Bay
LB
Leon Black
PERSON78 w/ the·8 w/ Bay
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION69 w/ the·8 w/ Bay
George W. Bush
PERSON57 w/ the·9 w/ Bay
Alexander Acosta
PERSON60 w/ the·4 w/ Bay
MF
Maria Farmer
PERSON59 w/ the·4 w/ Bay
FBI
ORGANIZATION54 w/ the·8 w/ Bay
A. Marie Villafana
PERSON53 w/ the·2 w/ Bay
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION46 w/ the·6 w/ Bay
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON39 w/ the·6 w/ Bay
Julie K. Brown
PERSON41 w/ the·4 w/ Bay
Alan Dershowitz
PERSON41 w/ the·3 w/ Bay
United States District Court
ORGANIZATION41 w/ the·3 w/ Bay