Epstein Secrets

E LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. [email protected] Michael R. Tein, Esq. [email protected] Robert D. Critton, Esq. [email protected] Michael Pike, Esq. [email protected] s/

antitrust conspiracy alleged in Twombly. See 127 S.Ct. at 1965. There should be no doubt that the Plaintiffs’ claims are plausible. Accordingly, Twombley is not authority for dismissal of the pleadings in these cases. II. THE ELEMENTS OF COUNT I FOR SEXUAL ASSAULT AND BATTERY ARE SUFFICIENTLY A

NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. [email protected] Michael R. Tein, Esq. [email protected] Robert D. Critton, Esq. [email protected] Michael Pike, Esq. [email protected] /s

it is determined by the factual allegations, which “must be enough to raise a right to relief above the speculative level.” Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombley, 127 5. Ct. 1955, 1965 (2007). Here, the factual allegations establish an intentional tort claim for sexual assault and battery.3 See Paul v. Holb

SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. [email protected] Michael R. Tein, Esq. [email protected] Robert D. Critton, Esq. [email protected] Michael Pike, Esq. [email protected] s/ Jeffrey M. Herman 11 EFTA002211

ive antitrust conspiracy alleged in Twombly. See 127 S.Ct. at 1965. There should be no doubt that the Plaintiffs' claims are plausible. Accordingly Twombley is not authority for dismissal of the pleadings in these cases. IL THE ELEMENTS OF COUNT I FOR SEXUAL ASSAULT AND BATTERY ARE SUFFICIENTLY ALLEGED

SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. [email protected] Michael R. Tein, Esq. [email protected] Robert D. Critton, Esq. [email protected] Michael Pike, Esq. [email protected] s/ Jeffrey M. Herman 11 EFTA002220

ive antitrust conspiracy alleged in Twombly. See 127 S.Ct. at 1965. There should be no doubt that the Plaintiffs' claims are plausible. Accordingly Twombley is not authority for dismissal of the pleadings in these cases. IL THE ELEMENTS OF COUNT I FOR SEXUAL ASSAULT AND BATTERY ARE SUFFICIENTLY ALLEGED

SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. [email protected] Michael R. Tein, Esq. [email protected] Robert D. Critton, Esq. [email protected] Michael Pike, Esq. [email protected] s/ Jeffrey M. Herman 11 EFTA002224

ive antitrust conspiracy alleged in Twombly. See 127 S.Ct. at 1965. There should be no doubt that the Plaintiffs' claims are plausible. Accordingly Twombley is not authority for dismissal of the pleadings in these cases. IL THE ELEMENTS OF COUNT I FOR SEXUAL ASSAULT AND BATTERY ARE SUFFICIENTLY ALLEGED

RVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. igoldberger(W.agwpa.com Michael R. Tein, Esq. [email protected] Robert D. Critton, Esq. [email protected] Michael Pike, Esq. [email protected] s/ Jeffrey M. Herman 11 EFTA001882

e antitrust conspiracy alleged in Twombly. See 127 S.Ct. at 1965. There should be no doubt that the Plaintiffs' claims are plausible. Accordingly, Twombley is not authority for dismissal of the pleadings in these cases. II. THE ELEMENTS OF COUNT I FOR SEXUAL ASSAULT AND BATTERY ARE SUFFICIENTLY ALLEGE