it is determined by the factual allegations, which “must be enough to raise a right to relief above the speculative level.” Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombley, 127 5. Ct. 1955, 1965 (2007). Here, the factual allegations establish an intentional tort claim for sexual assault and battery.3 See Paul v. Holb

antitrust conspiracy alleged in Twombly. See 127 S.Ct. at 1965. There should be no doubt that the Plaintiffs’ claims are plausible. Accordingly, Twombley is not authority for dismissal of the pleadings in these cases. II. THE ELEMENTS OF COUNT I FOR SEXUAL ASSAULT AND BATTERY ARE SUFFICIENTLY A