Epstein Secrets

This is not to say there aren't many victims who are eager to see Epstein face new charges in South Florida, wrote Byung J. Pak, U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Georgia, and Jill E. Steinberg and Nathan P. Kitchens, special attorneys for the Southern District of Florida. But they conclude that reopening their cases

fore-we-do-something-bad claim that deserves no credence from the Court," wrote Edwards and his co-counsel on behalf of the two women, identified as Jane Doe I and Jane Doe 2. They also pointed out that the prosecutors weren't asserting the alleged "risk" to some victims outweighs obtaining justice for

ernment's Notice of Proposed Procedures for the Determination of a Remedy The United States of America, by Byung J. Pak, United States Attorney for the Northern District of Georgia, and Special Attorneys for the Southern District of Florida, files this notice outlining the Government's proposed schedule for determining the iss

-cv-80736-KAM Document 451 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/10/2019 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Civil Action No. Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA Government's Notice of Proposed Pr

the documented efforts of the Southern District of Florida, see Jane Doe v United States Dkt 205-2, 08 cv 80736 and more recent interactions between the Northern District of Georgia which stands in the shoes of the Southern District of Florida with victims and their attorneys was inconsistent with the immunity-commitments that w

but not limited to consultations conducted in relation to the government's response to the court's summary judgment order and proposed remedies in Jane Doe v. United Stales, No. 08-cv-80736 (S.D. Fl.); 7. Information provided by alleged victims (or their counsel) related to Mr. Epstein prior to the re

TES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 v. UNITED STATES JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2'S REPLY TO INTERVENOR EPSTEIN'S BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO PROPOSED REMEDIES Bradley J. Edwards Edwards Pottinger LP 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite

the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAO-SDFL), which is currently being represented by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Northern District of Georgia. 2 EFTA00021446 --- PAGE BREAK --- Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 466 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/23/2019 Page 6 of 70 THIS CASE MUST BE DECIDED

of all relevant circumstances, it is important to understand the very limited reference the victims made to Epstein's NPA in their civil lawsuits. Jane Doe I and 2 filed their civil lawsuits in about September 2008, only after their CVRA petition had been filed — and had succeeded in forcing the USAO- SDF

TES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 v. UNITED STATES JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2'S REPLY TO INTERVENOR EPSTEIN'S BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO PROPOSED REMEDIES Bradley J. Edwards Edwards Pottin er LP Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice T

the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAO-SDFL), which is currently being represented by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Northern District of Georgia. 2 EFTA00022550 --- PAGE BREAK --- Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 466 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/23/2019 Page 6 of 70 THIS CASE MUST BE DECIDED

also extends to "Other Potential Defendants," defined as any "other person or entity would could have been included as a potential defendant" in the Jane Does lawsuit alleging sex abuse. Obviously, the United States was a not sex abuser and could not have been included in the lawsuit against Epstein. 42

DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 9:08-ev-80736-ICAM JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES, Respondent. JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2'S POSITION ON THE PROCEDURES TO BE FOLLOWED TO DETERMINE A REMEDY FOR THE GOVERNMENT'S VIOLATION OF THE CRIME VICTIMS' RIGHTS ACT J

unsel, requesting a 90-day extension of time in which to confer and propose procedural steps for determining an appropriate remedy. Through counsel, Jane Doe I and 2 conferred with the Office, noting that this case has been in litigation for more than a decade — requesting that a resolution be expedited. Th

contact with any victims or their counsel. In fact, during an April 29, 2019, conference call between attorneys from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Northern District of Georgia and counsel for Jane Does 1 and 2 (and 3 and 4), the Jane Does' counsel offered to simply have the conferral with the Government at that time on tha

minimum-security Palm Beach County facility. A copy of the NPA was filed under seal with the state court. On July 7, 2008, a victim, identified as "Jane Doe," filed in federal court in the Southern District of Florida an emergency petition alleging that the government violated the Crime Victims' Rights

appropriate remedies. After the court's order, the Department recused the USAO from the CVRA litigation and assigned the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Northern District of Georgia to handle the case for the government. Among the remedies sought by the petitioners, and opposed by the government, was rescission of the NPA and fe

minimum-security Palm Beach County facility. A copy of the NPA was filed under seal with the state court. On July 7, 2008, a victim, identified as "Jane Doe," filed in federal court in the Southern District of Florida an emergency petition alleging that the government violated the Crime Victims' Rights

appropriate remedies. After the court's order, the Department recused the USAO from the CVRA litigation and assigned the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Northern District of Georgia to handle the case for the government. Among the remedies sought by the petitioners, and opposed by the government, was rescission of the NPA and fe

minimum-security Palm Beach County facility. A copy of the NPA was filed under seal with the state court. On July 7, 2008, a victim, identified as "Jane Doe," filed in federal court in the Southern District of Florida an emergency petition alleging that the government violated the Crime Victims' Rights

appropriate remedies. After the court's order, the Department recused the USAO from the CVRA litigation and assigned the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Northern District of Georgia to handle the case for the government. Among the remedies sought by the petitioners, and opposed by the government, was rescission of the NPA and fe

curity Palm Beach County facility. A copy of the NPA was filed under seal with the state court. On July 7, 2008, a victim, identified as “Jane Doe,” filed in federal court in the Southern District of Florida an emergency petition alleging that the government violated the Crime Victims’ Rights

appropriate remedies. After the court’s order, the Department recused the USAO from the CVRA litigation and assigned the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Georgia to handle the case for the government. Among the remedies sought by the petitioners, and opposed by the government, was rescission of the NPA and f