Epstein Secrets

y of a claim for malicious prosecution in its own District and other Florida state and federal courts. See,

HT_013323 --- PAGE BREAK --- minor females that the United States Attorney's Office recognized as a victim. L.M.’s swom deposition te

HT_013323 --- PAGE BREAK --- minor females that the United States Attorney's Office recognized as a victim. L.M.’s swom deposition te

ay have civil damages claims against Mr. Epstein. The U.S. Attorney's Office and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (jointly

t violated because no federal charges were ever filed in the CUEING RFENEN.” ~-Aiarnny Gamera a ; , , a , , ; — Eric Holder discussing pressure from tern District of Florida,” Valle said. “Because the matter remains pending in court, it would be inappropriate at this time members of Congress to prosecute wide

oversy that would have erupted if the sweetheart plea deal with a politically connected billionaire had been revealed.” 1 Valle, special counsel for the U.S. Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida, in an email to the newspaper that the " ’ . " Decisi bout who, wh dh Attorney’s office will respond in court filings.

also attached. With regards, Counsel Office of Professional Responsibility U.S Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. — Room 3266 Washin ton, D.C. 20530 cc: AUSA EFTA00017797

ew York Dear Please find attached a letter from OPR Director regarding OPR's draft report regarding the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein matter by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida in 2006-2008. A copy of the draft report, for your review, is also attached. With regards, Counsel Office of

s also attached. With regards, Counsel Office of Professional Responsibility US. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NXC — Room 3266 Washin ton, D.C. 20530 cc: AUSA EFTA00018569 --- PAGE BREAK --- EFTA00018570

ork Dear Ms. Please find attached a letter from OPR Director regarding OPR's draft report regarding the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein matter by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida in 2006-2008. A copy of the draft report, for your review, is also attached. With regards, Counsel Office of

es v. United States, a federal case in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, usefully illustrates the issue. *° In that case, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida 22 Td. 33 Td. at 7302 (statement of Sen. Jon Kyl). 34 Compare /8 U.S.C. § 3771(d), with Susan Bandes, Victim S

ial evidence that an identifiable person has been directly and proximately harmed as a result of the commission of a federal offense or an offense in the District of Columbia, and in the judgment of the officer or employee, that person is a putative victim of that offense. This formulation borrows from the CVRA's